 | United States. Patent Office - 1933 - 632 страници
...the result of treatment, labor, and manipulation, as set forth in Hartranft v. Wieymann, 121 US 609. There must be a transformation, a new and different article must emerge * * * ". If plaintiff's map lines were drawn, sculptured or otherwise reproduced upon a natural marble... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1956 - 986 страници
...words of the United States Supreme Court further defining the term, Hartranft v. Wiegmann, 121 US 609, "There must be a transformation; a new and different...article must emerge having a distinctive name, character or use." In the investigation of operations of the Dart Transit Company, Dart Transit Go. v. Interstate... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1971 - 968 страници
...more is necessary, as set forth and illustrated in Hartranft v. Weigmann, 121 US 609. There must be transformation; a new and different article must emerge, "having a distinctive name, character or use."*** The Supreme Court continued at page 54: ***At some point processing and manufacturing will... | |
 | United States. Customs Court - 1971 - 888 страници
...there must be a transformation of the starting material into a new article of commerce. "There must be transformation; a new and different article must emerge, 'having a distinctive name, character or use.' " Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'nv United States, 207 US 556, 562. Upon reconsideration we hold... | |
 | United States. Office of Commissioner of Internal Revenue - 1914 - 352 страници
..."manufacture " as denned in Anheuser-Busch Association v. United States (207 US, 556, 562), where it is said: "There must be a transformation; a new and different article must emerge, 'having a distinctive name, character,and use.' " And bay rum, it is asserted, satisfies the distinction and has been regarded... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means - 1953 - 774 страници
...different one" (55 CJS sec. 39. p. 670). In Words and Phrases it states : "Manufacture implies a change. There must be a transformation ; a new and different...must emerge, having a distinctive name, character, or use" (Words and Phrases, vol. 26, p. 408). These, we believe, are the common and accepted meanings... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1953 - 536 страници
...more is necessary, as set forth and illustrated in Hartranft v. Wiegmann (121 US 609). There must be transformation: a new and different article must emerge, 'having a distinctive name, character, or use." * * *" The defendant and the Secretary of Agriculture particularly rely upon the definition... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce - 1953 - 1436 страници
...more is necessary, as set forth and illustrated in Hartranft v. Wiegmann (121 US 609). There must be transformation: a new and different article must emerge, 'having a distinctive name, character, or use.' * * *" The defendant and the Secretary of Agriculture particularly rely upon the definition... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means - 1956 - 262 страници
...different one" (55 CJS sec. 39, p. 070). In Words and Phrases it states : "Manufacture implies a change. There must be a transformation ; a new and different...must emerge, having a distinctive name, character, or use" (Words and Phrases, vol. 26, p. 408). These, we believe, are the common and accepted meanings... | |
 | United States. Department of the Treasury - 1908 - 780 страници
...under section 80, tariff act of 1897. 2. " MANUFACTURB " — TREATMENT NOT RESULTING IN NEW ARTICLE. " Manufacture" implies change; but not every change...improving processes, but which still remains a cork, is cot "manufactured" within the meaning of s,ctiou 80, tariff act of 1897. 3. DRAWBACE — "ARTICLES... | |
| |
... Manufacture implies a change, but every change is not manufacture, and yet every change in an article is the result of treatment, labor, and manipulation. But something more is necessary, as set forth and illustrated in Hartranft v. 
