Скрити полета
Книги Книги
" ... Manufacture implies a change, but every change is not manufacture, and yet every change in an article is the result of treatment, labor, and manipulation. But something more is necessary, as set forth and illustrated in Hartranft v. "
Digest of Decisions of the Treasury Department (customs) Board of U.S ... - Страница 199
по United States. Department of the Treasury - 1917 - 934 страници
Пълен достъп - Информация за книгата

The Pennsylvania Corporation Reporter, Том 9

Pennsylvania - 1921 - 604 страници
...more is necessary, as set forth and illustrated in Hartranft v. Wiegmann, 121 US 609. There must be transformation ; a new and different article must emerge, 'having a distinctive name, character, or use.' " McKenna, J., in Auheuser-Bush Brewing Association v. United States, 207 US 556, 562. "In...

United States Supreme Court Reports, Том 52; Томове 207–210

United States. Supreme Court - 1921 - 1160 страници
...illustrated in Hartranft v. Wiegmann, 121 US 609, 30 L. ed. 1012, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1240. There must be transformation; a new and different article must emerge, "having a distinctive name, character, or use." This cannot be said of the corks in question. A cork put through the claimant's process i»...

Court of Customs Appeals Reports: Cases Adjudged in the United ..., Том 11

United States. Court of Customs Appeals - 1923 - 748 страници
...Manufacture implies a change, but every change is not a manufacture, and yet every change in an article is the result of treatment, labor, and manipulation....necessary. * * * There must be a transformation, a now and different article must emerge having a distinctive name, character, or use. It was held in...

Court of Customs Appeals Reports: Cases Adjudged in the United ..., Том 12

United States. Court of Customs Appeals - 1925 - 692 страници
...more is necessary, as set forth and illustrated in Hartranft v. Wiegmann (121 US 609). There must be transformation; a new and different article must emerge, "having a distinctive name, character, or use." To the same effect are United States v. Semmer (41 Fed. 324), Baumgarten v. Magone (50 Fed....

Interstate Commerce Commission Reports: Motor carrier cases ..., Том 52

United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1950 - 1482 страници
...more is necessary, as set forth and Illustrated in Rartranft v. ~Weigmann, 121 US 609. There must be transformation ; a new and different article must emerge, "having a distinctive name, character or use." This cannot be said of the corks in question. A cork put through the claimant's process is...

Official Opinions of the Attorneys General of the United States ..., Том 35

United States. Department of Justice - 1929 - 652 страници
...more is necessary, as set forth and illustrated in Hartranft v. Wiegmann, 121 US 609. There must be transformation; a new and different article must emerge, 'having a distinctive name, character or use.'" These principles have been frequently applied in cases arising under the customs laws. Compare...

Interstate Commerce Acts Annotated

United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1930 - 948 страници
...natural state, but are manufactured products. — Home Transfer & Storage Co., 63 MCC 785 ( 790-1 )«. "There must be a transformation; a new and different...article must emerge having a distinctive name, character or use." [121 US 609].— Id., p. 792. Amendment of §203 (b6) to include horticultural commodities,...

Design Protection: Hearings Held Before the Committee on Patents, House of ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents - 1932 - 158 страници
...and illustrated in Hartranft v. Wiegmann (121 US 609, 30 L. ed. 1012, 7 S. Ct. 1240). There must be transformation ; a new and different article must emerge " having a distinctive name, character, or use." ' " An article of apparel would clearly be a " manufacture " under the principles of the above...

Cases Decided in the Court of Claims of the United States, Том 75

United States. Court of Claims - 1932 - 928 страници
...more is necessary, as set forth and illustrated in Hartranft v. Wi£g?nann, 121 US 609. There must be transformation; a new and different article must emerge, ' Having a distinctive name, character, or use.' " The plaintiff maintained no mercantile establishment, in the sense used in the commissioner's...

Design Protection. Hearings.....May 10, 11, 17, 1932. 72-1..

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents - 1932 - 156 страници
...and illustrated in Hartranft v. Wiegmaun (121 US 609, 30 L. ed. 1012, 7 S. Ct. 1240) . There must be transformation ; a new and different article must emerge " having a distinctive name, character, or use." ' " An article of apparel would clearly be a " manufacture " under the principles of the above...




  1. Моята библиотека
  2. Помощ
  3. Разширено търсене на книги
  4. Изтегляне във формат ePub
  5. Изтеглете PDF файл