...remonstrating with him, or reasomng with him. or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compalling him or visiting him with any evil in case he do otherwise. To justify thaL the conduct from which it is desired to deter him must be calculated to produce evil to someone...

...of Western liberal philosophies have extensively argued this. Mill (1991:14), for instance, writes: 'The only part of the conduct of any one, for which he is emenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns himself, his...

...even right. These are good reasons for remonstrating with him or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him,...to deter him must be calculated to produce evil to someone else. The only part of the conduct of anyone, for which he is amenable to society, is that...

...remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compeliing him, or visiting him with any evil in case he do otherwise....him, must be calculated to produce evil to some one eise. The only part of the conduct of any one, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns...

...justice, he says, "These are good reasons for remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him,...visiting him with any evil in case he do otherwise." In an extremely interesting discussion of Mill's doctrine, Peter Dalton points out that Mill suffered...

...controversy. For instance, when Mill insists that to justify interfering with the actions of another, “the conduct from which it is desired to deter him must be calculated to produce evil in someone else' the term calculated is pregnant with ambiguity.' 3 If it is interpreted to mean intended,...

...even right. These are good reasons for remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him, or visiting him with evil, in case he do otherwise." 9. Application of President and Directors of Georgetown College, 331...

...even right. These are good reasons for remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him,...visiting him with any evil in case he do otherwise" (Mill 1859/2001, 13). Hardly any prohibitory regulation could be congruent with the principle of utility....

...persuading or entreating him, but not for compelling him or causing him any sort of harm if he does otherwise. To justify that, the conduct from which it is desired to deter him must be thought to produce harm to someone else. "The only part of the conduct of any one, for which he is...

...even right. These are good reasons for remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him,...to deter him must be calculated to produce evil to someone else." 70. Hoagland, Lesbian Ethics, 215-221. 71. Barbara Houston, "In Praise of Blame," Hypatia...