Скрити полета
Книги Книги
" The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become vacant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested remainder... "
Reports of Civil and Criminal Cases Decided by the Court of Appeals of ... - Страница 32
по Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1913
Пълен достъп - Информация за книгата

The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, Том 3

John Austin - 1863 - 462 страници
...remainder contingent. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were now to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession...universally distinguishes a vested remainder from oue that is contingent."* Now I cannot help thinking that this test of a vested remainder is fallacious....

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court and in ..., Том 2

Hiram Denio - 1863 - 692 страници
...enjoyment if the particular estate of the trustees had then terminated by the death of his father ; and " the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become va cant, and not the certainty that the possession will become va cant before the estate limited in...

A Digest of New York Statutes and Reports: From the Earliest Period ..., Том 2

Benjamin Vaughan Abbott, Austin Abbott - 1864 - 812 страници
...interest is fixed, although it may be uncertain whether it will ever take effect in possession. It is the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, that distinguishes a vested from a contingent remainder. Ot. of Errors, 1845, Grout v. Townsend, 2...

A Treatise on the American Law of Real Property, Том 2

Emory Washburn - 1864 - 912 страници
...remainder is, to all intents, an estate commencing in pr&senti, though to be enjoyed in futuro.3 17. " The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were now to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become vacant before the estate...

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Chancery and ..., Том 1

Thomas Nesbitt McCarter - 1865 - 616 страници
...the interest of James and William is defeated by an event which has not, and now cannot occur. It is the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, that distinguishes a vested from a contingent remainder. Moore v. Rake, 2 Dutcher 572 ; Fearne on Rem....

Commentaries on the Laws of England: In Four Books, Том 1

William Blackstone, George Sharswood - 1867 - 926 страници
...liable; as the remainderman may die, or die without issue, before the death of the tenant for life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession,...the possession were to become, vacant, and not the certHintj that the possession will become vacant before ihe estate limited in remainder determines,...

The Most Material Parts of Kent's Commentaries Reduced to Questions and ...

John C. Devereux - 1868 - 444 страници
...the intention, be deemed vested. 11. Wliat distinguishes vested from contingent remainders f — 203. The present capacity of taking effect in possession,...possession will become vacant before the estate limited ia remainder determines. 12. What is a contingent remainderf — 206. A contingent remainder is limited...

Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the ..., Том 6; Том 73

United States. Supreme Court - 1870 - 842 страници
...of enjoyment, and not the uncertainty of its actual enjoyment, which renders a remainder contingent. The present capacity of taking effect in possession — if the possession were to become vacant — distinguishes a vested from a contingent remainder, and not the • Chew's Appeal, 45 Penn. 282...

United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Том 73

United States. Supreme Court - 1870 - 840 страници
...of enjoyment, and not the uncertainty of its actual enjoyment, which renders a remainder contingent. The present capacity of taking effect in possession — if the possession were to become vacant — distinguishes a vested from a contingent remainder, and not the * Chew's Appeal, 45 Penn. 232 ;...

Reports of Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: With ..., Том 1

Pennsylvania. Supreme Court, Jasper Yeates - 1871 - 564 страници
...DEVISE. 1. It is not the uncertainty of ever taking effect in possession, but the promt capacity of it, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the...before the estate limited in remainder determines, which distinguishes • vestal remainder from one that is contingent. Evans's lessee vs Davis. 340...




  1. Моята библиотека
  2. Помощ
  3. Разширено търсене на книги
  4. Изтегляне във формат ePub
  5. Изтеглете PDF файл