...required to be conducted in accordance sections 556 and 557 of this title. Administrative law judges shall assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable, and may not perfc duties inconsistent with their duties and responsibilities as adminis tive law judges. (Pub....

...especially Section 11 of the Act dealing with hearing examiners. The language of S 3105, $ 7521 and S S362 could not have been clearer or more forthright in...assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable, and nay not perform duties inconsistent with their duties and responsibilities as hearing examiners. A...

...qualified and competent examiners as may be necessary for proceedings pursuant to sections 7 and 8. Examiners shall be assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable and shall perform no duties inconsistent with their duties and responsibilities as examiners. Agencies...

...broadside attack on the regulations is this : § 11 of the Administrative Procedure Act requires that hearing examiners "shall be assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable * * *." Appellees read this to mean that cases assigned for hearing within an agency shall, in effect,...

...cornerstone from which we had to work. There being no authoritative interpretation of the provision that examiners shall be assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable we, of course, had to make our own decision as to what such phrasing meant. The Senate and House committee...

...qualified and competent examiners as may be necessary for proceedings pursuant to sections 7 and S, who shall be assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable and shall perform no duties inconsistent WILD their dudes and responsibilities as examiners. Examiners...

...from among the present examiners."29 The majority opinion next interpreted the APA's requirement that "examiners shall be assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable .t>30 The majority believed that this did not require mechanical rotation, but permitted assignments...

...employees whose actions are to be reviewed. In the performance of such review functions such employees shall be assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable and shall not be responsible to or subject to the supervision or direction of any officer, employee, or...

...employees whose actions are to be reviewed. In the performance of such review functions such employees shall be assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable and shall not be responsible to or subject to the supervision or direction of any officer, employee, or...

...employees whose actions are to be reviewed. In the performance of such review functions such employees shall be assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable and shall not be responsible to or subject to the supervision or direction of any officer, employee, or...