Litchfield (Earl of) v. Sir John | O'Keefe v. Calthorpe. Williams. Page 17 579 London Affurance Company and Oliver v. Taylor. 474 Motteux. 545 Omichund v. Barker: 21 Manning v. Lechmere. Marlar, ex parte. 95 Palmer v. Mafon. 505 453 Parfons, ex parte. 72 150 Parfons, ex parte. 204 Marlborough (Dutchefs of) Marshall et al, ex parte. v. Sir Partridge v. Pawlet. 467 454 Partridge and Cheeseman. 436 158 Patterson and Gibfon. 12 196 Powell v. Monnier. 611 230 245 454 89 493 440 252 482 290 414 489 Purfe v. Snaplin. Morgan and Probert. 440 Morris v. Burroughs. 399 Motteux v. London Affurance Com N. R. 97 Ramkiffenfeat v. Barker. 409 Ramkiffenfeat v. Barker. 51 60 Ramfden v. Jackson. 292 524 Read and Smith. 526 463 Richardfon v. Bradfhaw. 128 O. 102 Ridout v. Dowding. Ridout v. Lewis. Rittle and Ireland. 419 269 541 235 Rivers's cafe. 410 552 Roberdeau v. Rous. Smithfon (Sir Hugh) v. Thomp- Watts and Fawkner. 406 fon, 520 Wheat (Sir Thomas) and Dutchess Snaplin and Purfe. 414 of Marlborough. 454 Hemozandum, That on Monday the 21st of February 1736, CA P. I. Abatement and Revivoz: Vide title Bill, under the divifion, Supplemental Bill. CA P. II. Account. 399,410, 610, pl. 241. 3 Tr. Atk. (A) What shall be a good bar to a demand of a general one. Lord Chancellor. Michaelmas term 1737. Dawfon v. Dawson. W Cafe 1. ftated account, HERE a bill is brought for a ge- Where a defenneral account, and the defendant dant fets forth a fets forth a stated one, the plaintiff it is a bar to a muft amend his bill: For the fta- general one till ted account is, prima facie, a bar till particular errors are af- particular errois figned to the stated account. are affigned. To fupport a ftated account it is not sufficient to say, that It is not fuffici there has been a dividend, which implies an account ftated, ent, to maintain for a dividend may be made upon a fuppofition that the eftate a ftated account, will amount to fo much; but ftill subject to an account that has ben a divito alledge there may be taken afterwards. CA P. .III. Vide title Legacies. dend made between the pare ties. Graves v. Bogle, CA P. IV. Admiffion. Vide title Bill, under the divifion, Bills of Discovery, &c. VOL. I. CAP: |
