Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub

And I, the hapless male to one sweet bird,
Have now the fatal object in my eye
Where my poor young was limed, was caught,
and killed.

Glo. Why, what a peevish fool was that of
Crete,

That taught his son the office of a fowl!
And yet, for all his wings, the fool was drowned.
K. Hen. I, Daedalus: my poor boy, Icarus:
Thy father, Minos, that denied our course:
The sun that seared the wings of my sweet boy,
Thy brother Edward: and thyself, the sea
Whose envious gulf did swallow up his life.
Ah kill me with thy weapon, not with words!
My breast can better brook thy dagger's point,
Than can my ears that tragic history.
But wherefore dost thou come: is 't for my life?
Glo. Think'st thou I am an executioner?
K. Hen. A persecutor, I am sure thou art:
If murdering innocents be executing,
Why then thou art an executioner.

Glo. Thy son I killed for his presumption.
K. Hen. Hadst thou been killed when first
thou didst presume,

Thou hadst not lived to kill a son of mine.
And thus I prophecy,-that many a thousand
Which now mistrust no parcel of my fear;
And many an old man's sigh, and many a
widow's,

And many an orphan's water-standing eye
(Men for their sons', wives for their husbands' fate,
And orphans for their parents' timeless death),
Shall rue the hour that ever thou wast born.
The owl shrieked at thy birth; an evil sign:
The night-crow cried; aboding luckless time:
Dogs howled, and hideous tempests shook down

trees:

The raven rooked her on the chimney's top,
And chattering pies in dismal discords sung.
Thy mother felt more than a mother's pain,
And yet brought forth less than a mother's hope:
To wit, an indigest deformed lump,
Not like the fruit of such a goodly tree.

Teeth hadst thou in thy head when thou wast born,

To signify thou cam'st to bite the world:
And if the rest be true which I have heard,
Thou cam'st-

Glo. I'll hear no more :-Die, prophet, in
thy speech!
[Stabs him.

For this, amongst the rest, was I ordained. K. Hen. Ay, and for much more slaughter after this.

O God! forgive my sins, and pardon thee! [Dies. Glo. What, will the aspiring blood of Lancaster Sink in the ground? I thought it would have mounted.

See how my sword weeps for the poor King's death!

O may such purple tears be always shed
From those that wish the downfal of our house —
If any spark of life be yet remaining,
Down, down to hell; and say I sent thee thither;
[Stabs him again.

I, that have neither pity, love, nor fear.-
Indeed 't is true that Henry told me of;
For I have often heard my mother say

I came into the world with my legs forward:
Had I not reason, think ye, to make haste,
And seek their ruin that usurped our right?
The midwife wondered; and the women cried,
"O Jesus bless us, he is born with teeth!"
And so I was: which plainly signified
That I should snarl and bite, and play the dog.
Then, since the Heavens have shaped my body so,
Let hell make crook'd my mind to answer it.
I have no brother; I am like no brother:
And this word love, which greybeards call divine,
Be resident in men like one another,
And not in me: I am myself alone.-
Clarence, beware; thou keep'st me from the
light;

But I will sort a pitchy day for thee:
For I will buzz abroad such prophecies
That Edward shall be fearful of his life:
And then, to purge his fear, I'll be thy death.
King Henry and the Prince his son are gone:
Clarence, thy turn is next, and then the rest:
Counting myself but bad till I be best.-
I'll throw thy body in another room,
And triumph, Henry, in thy day of doom. [Exit.

SCENE VII.-The Same. A Room in the Palace. KING EDWARD is discovered sitting on his throne; QUEEN ELIZABETH with the Infant PRINCE, CLARENCE, GLOSTER, HASTINGS, and others, near him.

K. Edw. Once more we sit in England's royal throne,

Repurchased with the blood of enemies.
What valiant foemen, like to autumn's corn,
Have we mowed down, in tops of all their pride!
Three Dukes of Somerset, threefold renowned
For hardy and undoubted champions:
Two Cliffords, as the father and the son:
And two Northumberlands; two braver men
Ne'er spurred their coursers at the trumpet's

sound:

With them, the two brave bears, Warwick and Montague,

That in their chains fettered the kingly lion,

other superiority those advantages which he feels himself to want. Bacon remarks that the deformed are commonly daring; and it is almost proverbially observed that they are ill-natured. The truth is, that the deformed, like all other men, are displeased with inferiority, and endeavour to gain ground by good or bad means, as they are virtuous or corrupt.-JOHNSON.

"Welcome, brave Warwick: what brings thee to France?" Act III., Scene 3.

This nobleman's embassy and commission, the insult he received by the King's hasty marriage, and his consequent resolution to avenge it, with the capture, imprisonment, and escape of the King (Edward), Shakspere found in fall and Holinshed: but later, as well as earlier writers, of better authority, incline us to discredit the whole; and to refer the rupture between the King and his political creator to other causes.-There needs no other proof how little our common histories are to be depended on than this fabulous story of Warwick and the Lady Bona. The King was privately married to the Lady Elizabeth Widville in 1463; and in February, 1465, Warwick actually stood sponsor to the Princess Elizabeth, their first child.-SINGER.

"Did I let pass the abuse done to my niece?”

Act III., Scene 3. "King Edward (says Holinshed) did attempt a thing once in the earl's house, which was much against the earl's honesty:-whether he would have deflowered his daughter, or his niece, the certainty was not, for both their honours, revealed: for surely such a thing was attempted by King Edward."

"Or else you would not have bestowed the heir
Of the Lord Bonville on your new wife's son."
Act IV., Scene 1.

It must be remembered that, till the Restoration (of Charles II.), the heiresses of great estates were in the wardship of the King; who, in their minority, gave them up to plunder, and afterwards matched them to his favourites. I know not when liberty gained more than by the abolition of the Court of Wards.-JOHNSON.

"My lords, before it pleased his majesty
To raise my state to title of a queen,
Do me but right, and you must all confess
That I was not ignoble of descent."

Act IV., Scene 1. The father of the unfortunate Queen of Edward IV. was Sir Richard Widville, afterwards Earl Rivers. Her mother was Jaqueline, daughter of the Earl of St. Paul, and widow of John, Duke of Bedford, brother to Henry V.

"Come hither, England's hope.-If secret powers
Suggest but truth to my divining thoughts,
This pretty lad will prove our country's bliss."
Act IV., Scene 6.

This "pretty lad" was afterwards the fortunate and crafty Henry VII.-Holinshed, relating this incident, says, "Whom when the King (Henry VI.) had a good while beheld, he said to such princes as were with him,-Lo, surely this is he to whom both we and our adversaries, leaving the possession of all things, shall hereafter give room and place.""

Henry VII., to shew his gratitude to Henry VI. for this early presage in his favour, solicited Pope Julius to canonize him as a saint: but either Henry would not pay the money demanded, or (as Bacon supposes), the Pope refused, lest, "as Henry was reputed in the world abroad but for a simple man, the estimation of that kind of honour might be diminished if there were not a distance kept between innocents and saints."-MALONE.

"K. EDW. Thanks, noble Clarence; worthy brother thanks." Act V., Scene ¡.

The old quarto play appropriates this line to the Queen. The first and second folios, by mistake, have given it to Clarence. In Steevens's copy of the second folio, which had belonged to King Charles I., his Majesty had erased “Cia,” and written "King" in its stead. Shakspere, therefore, in the catalogue of his restorers, may boast a royal name.-SINGIL

THE Three Parts of KING HENRY VI. are suspected by Mr. Theobald of being supposititious, and are declared by Dr. Warburton to be certainly not Shakspere's. Mr. Theobald's suspicion arises from some obsolete words: but the phraseology is like the rest of our author's style; and single words (of which, however, I do not observe more than two) can conclude little.

Dr. Warburton gives no reason; but I suppose him to judge upon deeper principles and more comprehensive views, and to draw his opinion from the general effect and spirit of the composition, which he thinks inferior to the other historical plays.

From mere inferiority nothing can be inferred. In the productions of wit there will be inequality: sometimes judgment will err, and sometimes the matter itself will defeat the artist. Of every author's works one will be the best, and one will be the worst. The colours are not equally pleasing, nor the attitudes equally graceful, in all the pictures of Titian or Reynolds.

Dissimilitude of style and heterogeneousness of senti. ment, may sufficiently shew that a work does not really belong to the reputed author. But in these works no such marks of spuriousness are found: the diction, the versification, and the figures, are Shakspere's. These plays, considered without regard to character and incidents, merely as narratives in verse, are more happily conceived and more accurately finished than those of "KING JOHN," "KING RICHARD II.," or the tragic scenes of "KING HENRY IV. and V."-If we take these plays from Shakspere, to whom shall they be given? What author of that age had the same easiness of expression and fluency of numbers?

Of these three plays, I think the second the best. The truth is, that they have not sufficient variety of action, for the incidents are too often of the same kind. Yet many of the characters are well discriminated:- King Henry and his Queen, King Edward, the Duke of Gloster, and the Earl of Warwick, are very strongly and distinctly painted.-Joussos.

Johnson's belief that Shakspere was the original author of the Three Parts of "HENRY VI." is ably combated in Malone's "Dissertation" on the subject. That treatise is well worthy the perusal of those who would wish further to investigate the interminable question.-The praise of acute ness and elaborate research must also be accorded to a recent "Essay" by Mr. C. Knight, in opposition to the theory of Malone.-Q.

[ocr errors][merged small][graphic][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

INTRODUCTORY
REMARKS.

THE reader is acquainted with our opinion touching the authorship of the three plays of King Henry VI.

and will remember that the inclination of our belief lighted upon Shakspere as the person by whom they were composed. Genius, where it exists at all, cannot long exist without judgment. It is a subtle essence which flies off and is dispersed to nought, unless restrained by that which strengthens while it distributes it. Shakspere, any more than men of lesser pretensions, was not in his youth exempt from that crude and vicious ambition which incited him to make an exhibition of his natural powers while yet judgment had scarce power to germinate within him. Perhaps, likewise, he undervalued that cool, deliberate, and, to the young, unpoetical quality, as a medium through which the creations of the imagination were to be made manifest; and forgot, or rather, did not then know that rhapsodies, however splendid, hold no sure footing in this unstedfast world of ours-that they carry no feature whereby futurity shall recognise them that they have no hands wherewith to grasp immortality. At all events, it must be said that he adopted the dramatic forms as he found them, paying little heed to their imperfections, and, consequently, evincing as little anxiety to amend them; careful chiefly to shew the "prodigality of nature." Ebullitions of genius they were, but not works of art ;-art, which is the decus et tutamen, at once the grace and security of genius.

This froward delusion was not destined to find a lengthened entertainment in the mind of so mighty a genius and so subtle a philosopher as Shakspere. Vain glory was not for him, and true glory is the child of labour. Before, like his older rivals, he had presented pieces; performances, indeed, which made these rivals wonder whence this youth had come; now he began to revolve works which, when produced, constrained them to marvel whither he was going, and at what distance they were to be left behind. The envious and splenetic Greene waxed wrath, and poured his rancorous emotions into the kindred breast of Peele; whilst the greater Marlowe held his peace-it is to be hoped, for it may be believed, in wonderstricken admiration of the new-comer, who was never to depart.

Behold the first result of awakened and diligent judgment in the following play. Never was old Hesiod's saying, that "the half is more than the whole," more happily verified than in the drama of Richard III., as compared with the three preceding plays. Here there is no crowd; no pressure of incidents or of persons. The former have room to move in, the latter have space to breathe. There is air about them and between them; and it gives them life and spirit and vigour.

The character of Richard, in all its phases of wickedness (a most arduous one to depict), is very finely sustained. The grave and trifling dissembler, the saintly hypocrite, the mocking fiend, the inexorable tyrant, and the renowned soldier;-valour, decision, shrewdness, wit, refined dissimulation, and the grossest cunning-the difficult conjunction of these qualities in one man is effected with a master's skill. There is no character in Shakspere (Hamlet excepted) that required more exquisite labour at the hands of its author, or that has received it. Again, how wonderfully great is Queen Margaret! We have seen her in the former plays: look upon her now. No longer immediately interested in the events that take place before her she moves upon the scene, overshadowing it like a portentous destiny. "She rides in the whirlwind and directs the storm." Her curses, words before, now are works. They have become omens. Nor is our reason shocked when, as the play advances, we see her direful predictions verified. She has watched with fiend-like sagacity and untiring patience, the sequence of events, the effects of causes, the operations of character,

"Till old experience did attain

To something like prophetic strain."

Nothing is left for chance to divert or to accomplish. She "sees as in a map, the end of all ;" and when she departs for France, we scarcely require to be told the issue of Bosworth field.

"Richard III." is constructed with remarkable skill, and the language is eminently dramatic. It was several times published in quarto, previous to the first folio edition.

C

« ПредишнаНапред »