Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub

"A DISGRACE TO HUMANITY!" MR. YOUNG having sent a card relative to the increase of small-pox in London coincidently with the increase of vaccination to Mr. Benjamin Barrow, F.R.C. S., J.P., and Mayor of Ryde, received in reply the following—

"Your card on vaccination tells nothing. Your reasoning is fallacious.

"I consider your Society as a disgrace to humanity!-Yours faithfully, B. BARROW. "Ryde, I. of W., July 29th, 1881."

A disgrace to humanity! The true servants of humanity have been often thus stigmatised, and the deeper their service, the sharper the stigma; but in the stigma they found stimulus, and from the stimulus issue, victory.

JENNER AND JESTY.

THE following letter appeared in the British Medical Journal of 9th July

"Whilst on a visit in the county of Dorset, I was surprised to find on a gravestone in the churchyard of Piddletown the following memorial: 'In memory of George Jesty, who departed this life June 23rd, 1845, aged 63 years, youngest son of the late Mr. Benjamin Jesty, of Downshay, Isle of Purbeck, discoverer of the memorable vaccine inoculation.' Afterwards, I found in the churchyard of Worth Matravers, a memorial stone with the following inscription: 'Sacred to the memory of Benjamin Jesty, of Downshay, who departed this life April 16th, 1816, aged 70 years. born at Yetminster, in this county, and was an upright honest man, particularly noted for having been the first person known that introduced the cow-pox by inoculation, and who, from his great strength of mind, made the experiment from the cow on his wife and two sons in the year 1774.'

He was

"If this date can be relied upon, Jesty's experiment preceded Jenner's on the boy Phipps by twenty-two years. I was informed that Mr. B. Jesty was a large dairy-farmer.—-Yours faithfully, "F. WHITWELL.

"Shrewsbury, June 20th, 1881."

These particulars are frequently revived, and the true answer is that what Jesty claimed Jenner did not claim. Jesty inoculated with cow-pox, sharing the dairy-maids' faith that it prevented small-pox. Jenner knew that the dairy-maids were wrong, and that cow-pox did not avert small-pox. What he recommended was cow-pox produced by horsegrease. Pearson and others disregarded Jenner's recommendation and made use of cow-pox like Jesty; and Jenner did not resist; and not only did not resist, but allowed it to be supposed that they were fulfilling his programme. Facts, however are facts, and we should not let Jenner get mixed up with Jesty, and the course of Jenner's procedure be obscured.

A CARD FROM HASTINGS. Mr. Wheeler has received a post-card bearing the following anonymous communication-"It has been proposed, and I hope to see the same CARRIED OUT, That medical men do not attend unvaccinated cases of small-pox-let the fools attend upon themselves-M. D."-We have no objection. Our friends will not consider the prospect alarming.

A LETTER FROM FRANCE-A MOTHER'S EXPERIENCE.

THE packet of anti-vaccination tracts I have read with the deepest interest, and I would now suggest that, with your attacks upon Jenner and his socalled discovery, which could not have been scientifically tested when taken up, the London Society should obtain disinterested inedical instruction for the treatment of small-pox and publish it. The best mode of combating the disease should be made known. Ignorance on this subject throws many into the hands of Jennerian practitioners who, if they knew how to meet small-pox, would stand out against vaccination.

There is one fact which I am ready to concede to the Jennerians. It is, that pock-pitted faces are not nearly so frequent now as they were in my childhood. Perhaps it is because at that time the generation which had been inoculated with smallpox à la Mary Wortley Montagu, had not died out. The Jennerians altogether leave out of sight in accounting for the diminution of small-pox within this century the disease of variolic inoculation, which in the last had spread from the Levant to London.

My husband has told you under what circumstances he became an Anti-Jennerian. I had long before had doubts, but they were overruled by my family in 1866, when we lived in a neighbourhood where there was much small-pox, and I had an unvaccinated infant son. I do not remember when I was first vaccinated, but there was a tradition in the servants' hall that all the diseases of infancy crowded at once upon me, and left me a "deathupon-wires." At the age of eight I was, with several other brothers and sisters, re-vaccinated. In less than eighteen months after, the health of my eldest sister, a strong grown-up girl in the most robust condition when re-vaccinated, broke down. A goitrous swelling in the neck declared itself. My eldest brother caught the small-pox, but was not marked, and I was laid low with typhoid fever. I did not grow three inches from the age of nine to seventeen, when strength came back, and I shot up to a fair enough stature. The other children did not appear to suffer from any evil consequences; but I distinctly remember that a boy who was born after the general re-vaccination of the family, and who was a remarkably fine and healthy infant, was given in vaccination some horrible disease which fixed itself in the glands of the neck. He came of a splendidly healthy stock; but one would have said that he was the child of scrofulous parents. The family doctor, who had vaccinated him, suggested that a nursery-maid had been careless about the poor infant in her walks, and given him to dirty people to hold, which was an unfounded assumption. The child has grown up to be a sickly man. His glands are now all right; but the swelling only left them to settle in one of the knees.

The English believe in the Bible. You ought to call Moses into court. He had enlightened ideas on the subject of hygenics and sanitation, and would have never suffered morbid germs to be put into the blood. You could prove from Moses the whole skin principle, which in a country like England would be doing a great deal.

Before I conclude I shall mention a case of death from confluent small-pox of a girl who had lived in my service, and had been in a convent in which she was reared, vaccinated over and over again. There were long lines of vaccine marks on the upper part of her arm. Small-pox carried her away notwithstanding after three days' illness. E. C.

AN OUTRAGEOUS CASE.

MR. JOSEPH WOOD, furniture broker, of 207 Dalton Road, Barrow-in-Furness writes to Mr. Tebb, 18th August

"I was fined on 11th July in the sum of 20s. and costs for disobeying an order to vaccinate two of my children, total £3 4s. On Monday I was distrained upon for that amount and further costs, total £3 19s., and four police took £20 worth of goods from my place. My reason for not paying the fine was that in my opinion, and in that of my solicitor, it was illegally inflicted by reason of the presence on the Bench of the chairman of the Board of Guardians at whose instance I was prosecuted.

Mr. Wood is unquestionably right in his contention that he has been illegally fined. The presence of the chairman of the Board of Guardians on the Bench as his prosecutor and judge was so grossly indecent, that if his head were not turned by the vaccination craze he would recognise its impropriety. No doubt the Home Secretary will interfere and see that justice is done.

SHETTLESTON, an eastern suburb of Glasgow, is described in the Daily Mail as being in an alarming condition-dungsteads overflowing, roads flooded, etc., etc.; and to mend matters the authorities recently sent round a doctor to vaccinate the inhabitants!

MR. GEORGE A. SALA.-Mr. Sala is the gossip of the Illustrated London News, and is always amusing, and not the least so when he is frivolous. In the number for 23rd July, he says "I have received a bolster of printed and written documents referring to a London Society for the Abolition of Compulsory Vaccination. I have forwarded them to a friend of mine who is Honorary Secretary to the Societies for Abolishing the Compulsory Registration of Births, Deaths, and Marriages; for the Re-enactment of the Corn Laws, the Re-establishment of the Practice of Burning Witches Alive, the Restoration of Temple Bar, the Re-opening of the Fleet Ditch, and the Promotion of Infectious Diseases." It would be vain to reproach Mr. Sala with knowing a little of everything, and not much of anything; for that, he would reply, was his profession; but it accounts for his fun over the enforced quackery of vaccination, as hateful in its way as the superstition of witchcraft, with which, indeed, the analogy is remarkable.

RARITY OF SEERS.-Very, very few are the men who can, by and for themselves, see and describe the things that are before them. Just as it took thousands of years to produce a man who could see, what now any one can see when shown him, that the star Alpha in Capricorn is really two separate stars, so we had to wait long before the men came who could see the difference between measles and scarlatina, and still longer for the one who could distinguish between typhus and typhoid. Said Plato, "He shall be as a god to me, who can rightly divide and define." Men who have this faculty -the "Blick" of the Germans, we cannot produce directly by any system of education; they come, we know not when or why, forming a small band, a mere understanding of whose thoughts and works is a test of our highest powers. A single English dramatist, and a single English mathematician have probably equalled in scope and excellence of original work in their several fields, all the like labours of their countrymen put together.-JOHN S. BILLINGS, M. D. at International Medical Congress.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

"Yes."

"It vhas shust two hours more as a man comes in und says he vhas sent to waccinate on der odder arm, und I pays him two shillings und class of peer." "Yes."

"Pefore night a man mit spectacles comes in und says he vhas sent by der health poard to see oof I vhas waccinated. I show him two blaces, but he shakes his headt und says, 'Dot waccination am too high oop, und you vhil git der shmall-pox in der hands." Den he makes dot blace here, und I gif him twenty-five cents und class of peer.' "Yes."

"

"Vhell, in der course of four days six more men comes aroundt to waccinate me by order of der mayor, der gufernor, der president, der poard of bublic vorks, und I don't know vhat else, und efery time I bays two shillings und class peer. Vhen I vhas waccinated nine times I pegins to believe I vhas a greenhorn, und vhen der tenth man comes aroundt I hit him on der headt mit a bottle and vhalks oafer to see you aboudt it. Vhas it all right?"

"I guess the boys were guying you." "What ish dot?”

"Why, you haven't really been vaccinated at

all."

"No!"

"No; and you'd better be vaccinated again."

"Waccinated again! Waccinated den dimes? Nefer. Pefore I vhas waccinated den dimes I catches der shmall-pox, und goes to ped mit him all summer!"

MR. HENRY BERGH, President of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, writes to Mr. Tebb from New York, 30th July"I have never held but one opinion of that filthy, unnatural and criminal mode of treating disease in human beings by inoculating a healthy body with the matter derived from a diseased body of one of the lower animals."

GONE TO THE DOGS.

OUR readers will be amused with the following advertisement, now posted over south London

CANINE VACCINATION.

DOGS VACCINATED with Calf Lymph as a palliative of Canine Distempers (Typhoid Fevers, &c.), which are now prevalent. Hermetically sealed Calf Lymph from the Establishment of Dr. Renner kept in stock for that purpose. ROYAL SOUTH METROPOLITAN DOG & CAT HOSPITAL, BRIXTON,

Founder and Proprietor-A. E. CONSTANT. Veterinary and Canine Surgeon, late Government Inspector of Cattle, M.R.C.V.S.L.; Author of "A Treatise on the Cattle Plague," "Rabies in the Dog," &c.

Vaccinators Supplied with Calf Lymph.

It is an acknowledged fact by Medical Men that the diseases of the lower animals tend greatly to engender diseases (Fevers, &c.), among the human race, where they are allowed to be together.

MISS ROBINSON wishing to learn Mr. Constant's terms for the salvation of dogs from distemper, wrote to inquire, and the following was his

answer

"South Metropolitan Dog and Cat Hospital, 20th August, 1881.

"Madam,-Your favour to hand. The age I consider most suitable for canine vaccination is from 4 to 6 months. From extent of my practice of over 20 years, I believe it to greatly mitigate, if not entirely prevent, what is termed distemper. The fee at hospital is 7s 6d. I am, Madam, yours truly, A. E. CONSTANT, M.R.C.V.S.L."

Alas! it seems to be with dogs as with men, it only mitigates when it does not prevent. Cobbett tells us what that means.

SMALL-POX FROM A WIND INSTRUMENT.-There has been an outbreak of small-pox at Wokingham, and the Lancet, 23rd July, accounts for it by a musician with the disease upon him "blowing strenuously through a wind instrument, and thus presumably diffusing infection among hundreds of people" at a parish fête. "At Swallowfield twenty

cases have arisen, all traceable to the musician." Think what havoc such a musician might play at Covent Garden or Drury Lane!

MEDICAL QUACKERY.-The profession of medicine always has offered, probably always will offer, peculiar attractions to those who with weak principles, and still weaker consciences, desire to make profit by trading on the credulity of their patients. The thing is so exceedingly easy to do. Our real knowledge of disease in many of its departments is very vague, and our knowledge of therapeutics still less certain. There is room on all sides for differences of opinion, and scope for the introduction of new theories and the employment of high sounding epithets. The fatal facilities thus afforded to the charlatan have naturally made the well principled professors of physic, very vigilant in guarding their ranks against the introduction of quackery. We wish to be honest, and we wish to associate with none but those who are so.-MR. JONATHAN HUTCHINSON, F.R.C.S. at the Ryde Meeting of the British Medical Association, August, 1881.

WHY AWKWARD?-The Medical Press heads a

paragraph describing a case of small-pox in an unvaccinated pupil at Clifton College as "Awkward for Anti-Vaccinators." Why awkward? Whoever maintained, that to be unvaccinated was to be secure from small-pox? It is vaccinators who promise security from small-pox to those who submit to their rite, whilst Nature is continually placing them in the awkward position of convicted impostors.

[ocr errors]

DR. WM. STRANGE of Worcester, describes a card on which is set forth the increase of small-pox in London, contemporaneously with increase of vaccination, as an insult to the intellect of a boy of seven years old." Why? If what is said to prevent small-pox, not only does not prevent it, but suffers it to increase, the insult to the intellect is administered by those who cry for more and more of what is thus manifestly impotent.

MR. GEORGE SMITH of Coalville writes to the Daily News that for the second time within four months, small-pox has been conveyed from London to Braunston in canal-boats; adding that "in the first case there were man, woman, and six children sleeping in the cabin; and in the second there were living in the cabin at the time the boat 'pulled up' two men, two women, and two children of three different families."-We would ask Mr. Smith whether it is not conceivable that these boat-folk conveyed the small-pox to London? Has Mr. Smith never heard of varioplasm, an unknown substance that lies under the human skin, and breaks out into small-pox, whenever overcrowding and foul air provides the requisite stimulus ?

DRYSDALE'S CONVERSION BY CEELY.--An enthusiastic calf-lympher was Dr. Drysdale, but in the Medical Press of 27th July, he reports his conversion to a small-pox lympher; and in this wise

"It happened that I had a very long conversation with the late Mr. Ceely of Aylesbury at Cambridge, and he most kindly went into the subject of the production by himself of true vaccine vesicles on the cow by the inoculation of the matter of small. pox on the udders. Again and again did he assure me that he had on several occasions succeeded in this experiment, and that he had afterwards vaccinated many children with the lymph from these vesicles. A sceptic before, I was convinced; and unless M. Warlomont has something more to tell us than we have heard from MM. Chaveau, Viennois, and Meynet, I can only say that the positive experiments of Ceely must be taken to have proved the point that vaccinia is merely human small-pox modified in some way by transmission through the cow."

SCANDAL FROM CARDIFF.-Mr. T. Garrett Horder, public vaccinator, writes to the Lancet of 20th August that he has inspected the Cardiff schools, and has found no less than a hundred children without any marks of vaccination, and that at least 25 per cent. of the vaccinated were unprotected, either because the marks were too few in number, or because they were imperfect in character. What a scandalous assertion! At least 25 per cent. of the vaccination in Cardiff a sham, and little better than no vaccination! How does the Lancet suffer a correspondent to make such unprofessional imputations? The work, however bad, was paid for in good money, and the doctors had the money. Mr. Horder concludes by advising that no children be admitted to school without proper vaccination marks, and agrees with the Lancet in thinking that small-pox will never be stamped out until a Compulsory Re-vaccination Act is passed.

.

THE INTERNATIONAL
ANTI-VACCINATION CONGRESS.

Lohnert of Chemnitz, Saxony; Signor Damiani of Naples, and several well-known English delegates. The circular of invitation to the Congress contains the names of upwards of eighty of the most distinguished friends of the cause, including professors in various continental uni

Those who intend to furnish statistics and papers, or to take personal part in the proceedings, are requested to communicate with Dr. Oidtmann, or Mr. William Tebb, 7 Albert Road, Regent's Park, London. We cannot well overestimate the importance of the Congress as a means of collecting and disseminating information and stimulating our associates everywhere to renewed efforts in furtherance of this righteous movement.

At a meeting of the Executive Committee of the London Society on 3rd August, it was resolved that the Chairman write to Dr. Oidtmann to the following effect

The Committee of the London Society having heard from Mr. Tebb that arrangements have been made for holding a second International Anti-Vaccination Congress at Cologne in October, record their cordial satisfaction, and will do their utmost to further a project of so much importance.

Ar the close of the proceedings of the First International Anti-Vaccination Congress held in Paris on the 11th, 12th, and 13th December last, a resolution was passed agreeing to continue these international gatherings until Com-versities, and members of the German, English, pulsory Legislation should have been abolished and Swiss parliaments. in the leading Continental States. In order to carry on the work an International Committee was appointed, comprising well-known friends of the movement in France, Germany, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland, Russia, Sweden, England, Canada, and the United States; to which were subsequently added members for Northern and Southern Italy, Bavaria, Spain, and Australia. In consequence of the interest excited in the question in France, pending the discussion on M. Liouville's Bill in the French Academy of Medicine, the Committee was urged to hold the second Congress in Paris; but after fully considering all the circumstances of the case, they deferred to the persuasion of their indefatigable co-worker and leader in the cause, Dr. H. Oidtmann, and the stronger claims of Germany; and it was resolved to hold the next Congress at Cologne during the second week in October. A meeting of several active members of the Committee was held at Cologne on the 22nd of June, when a programme of the subjects to be considered was discussed and determined. The purpose of the Congress will be, 1st, to obtain and classify all trustworthy facts and statistics, both municipal and national, where vaccination is enforced by law; 2nd, to read and discuss papers on the subject; 3rd, to obtain the repeal of coercive legislation by all legitimate means. At the Paris convention the number of papers presented dealing with the various phases of the vaccination question were so numerous that it was found necessary to withhold a portion, and to abbreviate others; and in order to obviate a repetition of this necessity, it has been arranged to divide the Congress into sections, each dealing with a separate branch of the subject. At the Paris meeting eighteen delegates, representing eight nationalities, were present; but a much larger gathering is expected in October at Cologne. Among the opponents of compulsory vaccination who have signified their intention of taking part in the proceedings are Count Zedtwitz of Vienna; Dr. Hubert Böens of Charleroi; Professor Adolf Vogt, M.D., Berne University; Dr. H. Oidtmann of Linnich; Herr Zoppritz of Stutgartt; Dr. Scheurmann of Basle; Herr Carl

MR. P. A. TAYLOR has given notice of the following motion in the House of Commons— "Early next session to call attention to the undoubted failure of vaccination to prevent epidemics of small-pox, and to move that in the opinion of this House it is unjust and impolitic to enforce vaccination under penalties upon those who regard it as unadvisable or dangerous."

MR. P. A. TAYLOR, M.P. has in the press a reply to Dr. W. B. Carpenter on the Vaccination Question. It will be published immediately. Price 1d.

THE ANTI-VACCINATOR.-Mr. Pickering of Leeds of bound copies of The Anti-Vaccinator and Public has made the London Society a present of his stock Health Journal. It is a handsome volume, and full of facts and arguments set forth with remarkable vigour and perspicuity. The London Society will be glad to hear of libraries where The Anti-Vaccinator would be accepted and allowed to pass into circulation. Copies may be had privately for 1s 6d. Address Mr. Wm. Young, 114 Victoria-street Westminster.

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that.-J. STUART MILL.
Prejudice, which sees what it pleases, cannot see what is plain.-AUBREY DE Vere.

The Vaccination Inquirer

VOL. III., No. 31.]

And Health

NOTES OF THE MONTH.

Review.

OCTOBER, 1881.

THE case of William Escott does not excite comfortable reflections. A story has been concocted and imposed on the public credulity, which under scrutiny has vanished like smoke. It would appear as if to disbelieve in vaccination, and to 1 have small-pox along with that disbelief, places a man outside the law of mercy, and as if the rule of truth itself were suspended for the greater glory of vaccination. At the same time, it is not for us to be depressed as in presence of some unheard-of phenomenon. The circumstances, however disgraceful and deplorable, are in nowise unusual. Escott's case is merely a reproduction under our eyes of innumerable similar passages in ecclesiastica), political, and social history. Human nature is a constant quantity, and its aberrations obey a fixed law. When, as in the instance of small-pox and vaccination, craft and terror combine, men invariably exhibit themselves as unscrupulous, cruel, and mendacious. Taking Dr. Johnston as the representative of craft and Parson Beck as that of terror, we have in the fiction of the one and the howls of the other, with the newspapers for chorus, a game which has been played since human nature had its being. Some of our friends are indignant over the facility with

which the Press has lent itself to the wild hue and cry, but the Press is no more than a reproduction of the uninstructed public mind. Escott's case, as described by Johnston, suited the literary milliners who provide sensation for the public, and they set it forth, with various dexterous touches and twitches, without any concern for accuracy. When vaccination comes to be discredited, they will, with equal art and equal indifference, trick out the last news to its disadvantage.

MR. BOTTOMLEY FIRTH, M.P. for Chelsea, says, "My own impression is that vaccination is often productive of good, and that it saved my own life." The value of the first half of Mr. Firth's impression may be estimated by the second -that vaccination saved his life. How does he

[PRICE 1d.

know? If small-pox were invariably fatal, and the vaccinated escaped alive, it would be fair to argue that vaccination saved life; but small-pox, on the average, is only fatal to about one in five or six of those attacked, and is a disease of a wide range of intensity, so slight as to be without danger, and so severe as to render death inevitable; and this varied character of small-pox was known and recognised ere vaccination was heard of. When vaccination was introduced it was with the unqualified promise that it made smallpox impossible. Experience falsified the promise, and then the vaccinating quacks said, "Yes; but when it does not prevent," it makes the disease milder." Where was the standard of severity against which "the mildness" might be measured? The vaccinated and re-vaccinated die of confluent and virulent smallpox, and in what respect is the disease made milder for them? Mr. Firth was vaccinated, and had small-pox; but, according to the original Jennerian revelation, he ought never to have had small-pox at all. But, if I had not been vaccinated," he says, "I should have died." How does he know? No one surely pretends that mild small-pox and recoveries from severe smallpox came in with vaccination. Mr. Firth is spoken of as a Quaker of sceptical tendencies. He might do worse than apply the said tendencies to vaccination, for he could scarcely exhibit himself in a more credulous attitude than in

[ocr errors]

meekly reciting the vaccinating quack's catechism, "I believe that vaccination does good; and, though it did not preserve me from small-pox, it saved my life, for it made the disease milder."

WHAT has been frequently predicted has at last come to pass; namely, an epidemic of smallpox in which all the sufferers have been vaccinated. There have been, there is little doubt, many such epidemics, but some uncertainty as to the fact of complete vaccination has been affected or asserted. In a recent outbreak at Bromley, where 43 patients entered the hospital, all were vaccinated, and three were re-vaccinated; two-thirds being young people between the ages of ten and

« ПредишнаНапред »