The York Legal Record, Том 42York Legal Record Print, 1928 A record of cases argued and determined in the various courts of York County; together with reports and abstracts of the most important cases adjudicated throughout the Commonwealth (varies slightly). |
Между кориците на книгата
Резултати 1 - 5 от 69.
Страница 4
... counsel for the receiver and owner in his not violate Section 7 , Article III , of the argument on the second question , in view Constitution , as being a special law for of the decision of the Supreme Court in the creation of liens ...
... counsel for the receiver and owner in his not violate Section 7 , Article III , of the argument on the second question , in view Constitution , as being a special law for of the decision of the Supreme Court in the creation of liens ...
Страница 6
... counsel for the defendant appeared , judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for fifty dollars . On May 13 , 1924 , the defendant took an appeal , which was duly entered to the above number and term . August 26 , 1926 , the ...
... counsel for the defendant appeared , judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for fifty dollars . On May 13 , 1924 , the defendant took an appeal , which was duly entered to the above number and term . August 26 , 1926 , the ...
Страница 8
... counsel may prepare and submit the quested that they be destroyed . It ap- proper final decree , sec . reg . We have carefully read the testimony in this case and are not convinced that the chancellor was in error in his findings of ...
... counsel may prepare and submit the quested that they be destroyed . It ap- proper final decree , sec . reg . We have carefully read the testimony in this case and are not convinced that the chancellor was in error in his findings of ...
Страница 9
... counsel , I find the following : 1. The parties are husband and wife , who were married at this city , the place of their common domicile , in 1909. They lived and cohabited together as such until November , 1924 , when , without reason ...
... counsel , I find the following : 1. The parties are husband and wife , who were married at this city , the place of their common domicile , in 1909. They lived and cohabited together as such until November , 1924 , when , without reason ...
Страница 16
... Counsel for defendant urges that the knew them as confirmed runaways ; and evidence relative to the past conduct of that the question here submitted to the the blacks , their known characteristics jury was not whether these horses had ...
... Counsel for defendant urges that the knew them as confirmed runaways ; and evidence relative to the past conduct of that the question here submitted to the the blacks , their known characteristics jury was not whether these horses had ...
Други издания - Преглед на всички
Често срещани думи и фрази
Act of June action affidavit of defense agreement alleged amended amount appeal April assumpsit attorney authority averred bail bill borough Brown & Bigelow certiorari charge City Common Pleas Commonwealth Company contract corporation costs counsel creditors damages decedent decree defendant defendant's deposit directors discharged divorce entered equity evidence exceptions execution favor fendant fieri facias filed findings of fact fire apparatus held husband indictment issued judge judgment jurisdiction jury justice liable libellant lien ment mortgage motion municipal November 26 officer ordinance owner paid parties payment Pennsylvania person petition petitioner Philadelphia Philadelphia Co plaintiff proceeding provides purchase quarter sessions question reason received recognizance record refused replevin resulting trust Root Company rule school district search warrant Section show cause statement of claim statute suit Superior Ct surety sustained taxes testimony thereof tiff tion trial verdict wife writ York County