Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub
[ocr errors][ocr errors]

of a despot, are all traits of a spirit as noble as it is uncommon. With a soul above meanness, a station above poverty, and a temper of philosophy above covetousness, what man will be envious enough to think that he was a pensioner of France?

In this place I shall take the liberty of inserting a few words relative to another accusation against Sydney. Mr. Hume says, that "the ingratitude and breach of faith of Sydney, in applying for the King's pardon, and immediately on his return entering into cabals for rebellion, form a conduct much more criminal than' the taking of French gold." Dalrymple, in his florid manner, compares him to Brutus, who disregarded private obligations in a public cause. It is difficult to estimate the amount of the obligation conferred by Charles on Sydney. As he had not sate on the trial of Charles the First, he was not excepted out of the Act of Indemnity. Had he come over immediately afterwards, he could not have been prosecuted or imprisoned, without a breach of law and justice. His father, Lord Leicester, however, wrote to him, that, though the Bill of Indemnity be lately passed, yet if there be any particular and great displeasure against you, as I fear there is, you may feel the effects thereof from the higher

66

powers, and receive affronts from the lower." In fact, the law was then so little a protection, that he could not rely upon it without the additional favour of the Court. For this reason he applied for a passport, which was refused. At length, however, when his father was dying, a passport was granted, and an end thus put to an unjust and illegal persecution. Such is the amount of Sydney's obligation to Charles the Second.

With respect to the other members of the Opposition, I do not by any means intend to deny that some amongst them may have received the money of France. Corrupt men were no doubt to be found in that age, in all parties, and some may have reconciled so mean an act to their conscience by the reflection that they still pursued the true interest of their country. But it is remarkable, that of the twenty persons mentioned in Barillon's last and longest list, not above half were in Parliament, and almost all of those were leaders. Now if any one or two obtained money from Barillon for persons to whom they did not distribute it, or if Barillon himself embezzled the money, the names which would naturally appear in his

Meadley's Life of Sydney, p. 326. Appendix.

lists would be those of the speakers who had the greatest reputation. But if the transactions were real, it is much more probable that he should have been able to buy the lower and more obscure members of parliament, than those whose fame stood highest for ability and integrity.

I here subjoin the two lists of Barillon. Courtin's, which is dated in one part of Sir J. Dalrymple, 15th May*, and in another place 15th July †, 1677, concerns only Lord Berkshire, here called Lord Barker, and six others not members of Opposition.

Barillon from 22d December, 1678, to 14th December, 1679.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

CHAP. XI.

LORD RUSSELL

LEAVES THE COUNCIL.

BLACK BOX.

SCOTLAND. - MON

ELECTION OF SHERIFFS.- DUKE OF YORK INDICTED
AS A RECUSANT. HE GOES ΤΟ
MOUTH'S PRogress. MEETING OF PARLIAMENT.
VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE WHO HAD PROMOTED THE
ABHORRING ADDRESSES. LORD RUSSELL SECONDS A
MOTION FOR BRINGING IN THE EXCLUSION BILL.
REASONS IN FAVOUR OF IT. — DEBATES IN THE COM-
MONS. THE BILL PASSES THROUGH A COMMITTEE.
-MESSAGE FROM THE CROWN.
PASSED BY THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, AND CARRIED
UP BY LORD RUSSELL TO THE HOUSE OF LORDS.
IS THROWN OUT. OBSERVATIONS OF MR. FOX.

[ocr errors]

-

EXCLUSION

BILL

[ocr errors]

IT

THE King had agreed, upon the pressing instances of the Duke, that he would recall him from Scotland as soon as Parliament was prorogued; and the 26th January was no sooner passed, than he declared his resolution Jan. 28. in Council. Three days afterwards, 1680. Lord Russell, Lord Cavendish, Mr. Powle, and Mr. Lyttleton, "distasted at the late prorogation," says Sir W. Temple, " as well as at the manner of it, and pretending to despair of being able to serve the King any longer, in a conduct of affairs so disagreeable to the

« ПредишнаНапред »