The York Legal Record, Том 90York Legal Record Print, 1976 A record of cases argued and determined in the various courts of York County; together with reports and abstracts of the most important cases adjudicated throughout the Commonwealth (varies slightly). |
Между кориците на книгата
Резултати 1 - 3 от 53.
Страница 74
... period under Rule 1100 , the period of December 9 , 1975 ( the original date that the defendant was supposed to be arraigned ) to the date the defend- ant was tried on February 26 , 1976 . We disagree . It was clearly the de- fendant's ...
... period under Rule 1100 , the period of December 9 , 1975 ( the original date that the defendant was supposed to be arraigned ) to the date the defend- ant was tried on February 26 , 1976 . We disagree . It was clearly the de- fendant's ...
Страница 76
... periods of judicial delay from the prescribed time period , but also precludes an extension of the prescribed time period pre- dicated upon judicial delay . *** Clearly , if pre - trial periods of judicial delay were allowed to justify ...
... periods of judicial delay from the prescribed time period , but also precludes an extension of the prescribed time period pre- dicated upon judicial delay . *** Clearly , if pre - trial periods of judicial delay were allowed to justify ...
Страница 88
... period . This was 296 days after the complaint was filed . How- ever , from this period must be de- ducted the 67 days between the is- suance of the warrant on June 2 , 1975 and the date defendant could be found and arrested on August 8 ...
... period . This was 296 days after the complaint was filed . How- ever , from this period must be de- ducted the 67 days between the is- suance of the warrant on June 2 , 1975 and the date defendant could be found and arrested on August 8 ...
Други издания - Преглед на всички
Често срещани думи и фрази
Agency Law alleged application argued arrest of judgment Assumpsit burglary charge City of York co-defendant Common Pleas Commonwealth Commonwealth witnesses complaint Corsa Court erred Court found Court held Court of Common crime Criminal Action Criminal Law cross-examination DECREE NISI Defendant claims Defendant contends Defendant was convicted Defendant's defense counsel demurrer dence District Attorney easement Equity establish evidence exception is noted fact failed failure fendant filed motions fire granted guilty involved issue January Sessions John Randle Judge jurors jury ment Miranda warnings mistrial monwealth notice offense overruled parties Pennsylvania petition plaintiff plea bargain Pleas of York police officer post-trial motions pre-trial premises prior question reasonable record refused request Rule sentence Shadle sion statement sufficient Superior Ct suppress Tax Claim Bureau tax sale tence testi testified testimony tion trial Court verdict victim voluntary manslaughter waiver wife York County