 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1872 - 640 страници
...1 Bosw. 222 ; Binninger v. Wattles, 28 How. Pr. 206. A party can not appropriate, as a trade mark, a sign or symbol, which, from the nature of the fact which it is used to represent, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ, for the... | |
 | Joseph S. Bosworth, New York (State). Superior Court (New York) - 1863 - 740 страници
...which have no relation to the origin or ownership of the goods, and are only meant to indicate their quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol which from the nature of the fact it is meant to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1868 - 658 страници
...It is undouhtly true that no one " has a right to appropriate a sign or Newman agt. Alvord. symhol which, from the nature of the fact which it is used ' to signify, others may employ with equal trath, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose." This is one of the positions... | |
 | Charles Richards Brown - 1871 - 426 страници
...receive it but for the wrongs by which the patrons are unwittingly deviated. The complainant has 110 right to appropriate a sign or symbol which from the nature of the fact it is m .ant to signify, others may emyloy with equal truth for the same purpose. 2 Sumlf. R., 599.... | |
 | Abraham Lansing - 1873 - 634 страници
...exclusive use of any words, letters, figures or symbols, which have no relation to the origin or ownership of the goods, but are only meant to indicate their...quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol from the nature of the fact which it is used to signify others may employ with equal truth, and, therefore,... | |
 | William Wait - 1873 - 950 страници
...exclusive use of any words, letters, figures or symbols, which have no relation to the origin or ownership of the goods, but are only meant to indicate their name or quality. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. Spear, 2 Sandf. 599 ; SC, 7 NY Leg. Obs. 301 ; Stokes v. Landgraff, 17... | |
 | 1874 - 440 страници
...an exclusive use of any words, letters or figures which have no relation to the origin or ownership of the goods, but are only meant to indicate their name or quality." Again, in Fetridge v. Wells, 13 How. 385, Mr. Justice Duer declares that a name can only be protected... | |
 | 1874 - 450 страници
...an exclusive use of any words, letters or figures which have no relation to the origin or ownership of the goods, but are only meant to indicate their name or quality." Again, in Fetridge v. Weih, 13 How. 385, Mr. Justice Duer declares that a name can only be protected... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1877 - 678 страници
...that a person — Has no right Jo appropriate a sign or a symbol which, from the nature of the fact it is used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and, therefore, have am equal right to employ for the same purpose. Numerous cases are there cited also sustaining this... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (4th Circuit) - 1877 - 684 страници
...to the use of any words, letters, figures, or symbols, which have no relation to origin or ownership of the goods, but are only meant to indicate their name or quality. No one can appropriate a sign or symbol which, from the nature of the fact which it is used to signify,... | |
| |
He has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol which, from the nature of the fact it is used to signify others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ, for the same purpose. 
