Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents
Drawing on political, legal, national, post-national, as well as American and European perspectives, this collection of essays offers a diverse and balanced discussion of the current arguments concerning deliberative democracy. The essays consider the thr
Какво казват хората - Напишете рецензия
Не намерихме рецензии на обичайните места.
Is the Ideal of a Deliberative Democracy Coherent?
The Value Added by Theories of Deliberative Democracy
Democracy and the Real Speech Situation
Conﬂict and SelfInterest in Deliberation
Framing Public Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy in
The People in Deliberative Democracy
Institutional Reform and Democratic Legitimacy
Други издания - Преглед на всички
accept according actually affected argue argument authors bargaining better Bohman Cambridge Chapter citizens civility claim Cohen Commission commitment conception conﬂict considered constitutional context contribute Court decision-making decisions defend deliberative democracy democratic democratic deliberation demoi demos discussion Elster epistemic equal Estlund European example existing expression fact formal give given Habermas idea ideal implies important independent individual institutions interests issues judges justice justifiability legitimacy legitimate liberal majority means moral mutual normative opinion outcomes Oxford participants particular Pettit political popular possible practice preferences principle problem procedure proposal public deliberation public sphere purely question reasons representation representatives requires respect role rule seems sense situation social society standards structure territorial theory Thompson transnational transparency understanding Union University Press voting
Страница 233 - That the people have an original right to establish, for their future government, such principles as, in their opinion, shall most conduce to their own happiness, is the basis on which the whole American fabric has been erected.
Страница 233 - Nor does this conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both ; and that where the will of the legislature, declared in its statutes, stands in opposition to that of the people, declared in the Constitution, the judges ought to be governed by the latter rather than the former. They ought to regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws rather than by those which are not fundamental.
Страница 233 - The exercise of this original right is a very great exertion; nor can it, nor ought it, to be frequently repeated. The principles, therefore, so established are deemed fundamental. And as the authority from which they proceed is supreme and can seldom act, they are designed to be permanent.