Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub

and nervous developement of the present day would require intellectual and refined gratifications, greatly superior to those which would have contented an exactly similar temperament or nervous developement two or three centuries ago. Hence, the quality of food, clothing, habitation, &c. of nations at different times will not alone suffice to prove a superiority in the nervous system of the people. Positive proof, in short, must be seen, not inferred. But so far as inferences and probabilities can extend, the subject is ably handled by Dr. Verity, and the ideas to be gained by perusal of his work will amply repay the readers of it.

Dr. Verity contends that peculiarities of temperament are not so similar throughout the several parts of the same being, as is commonly assumed by phrenologists, and by many medical and physiological writers. We shall quote his own words on this topic, and recommend his views to the attention of our readers. "These temperaments," he says, "more commonly than generally supposed, as well as the different elemental tissues and systems of the body, will be found unequally distributed throughout the same individual, some parts of the body possessing the normal proportion of a particular temperament, tissue, or system, whilst the others do not. Such irregularities may be almost always traced to organic causes residing within the constitution of the immediate parents, or to peculiarities in one or other of the families from which the individual may happen to be descended. A numerous class having this unequal distribution is characterised by the head being powerfully organised and richly suffused with nervous influence, performing with ease a more than ordinary extent and load of mental labour; whilst the trunk and abdominal system, voluminous beyond proportion, are remarkable for adipose depositions and lymphatic obstructions - a class containing frequently amongst its members, authors, men of science, orators, and politicians (S. Johnson, Leslie, Magendie, Fox, Pozzo di Borgo, &c.), and, generally speaking, all those individuals falling under the well-known definition "active in mind, indolent in body." Another example of this inequality of structural distribution is observed where, in a fine nervous temperament, the glandular and absorbent system presents evidence in some parts of the body of a strumous diathesis; and another, where we find an active vascular organisation giving habitual floridness to the complexion of the face and head, whilst the circulation in the capillary tissue of the extremities is in such poor endowment as scarcely to suffice for the adequate generation of heat. The osseous, muscular, and other systems have very commonly also their examples of unequal

developement throughout the different parts of the same individual." (Pages 62–3.)

[ocr errors]

In two notes connected with this passage, the author alludes to the influence of constitutional peculiarities in the parents upon the organisation of their descendants. In common with several other writers upon the same subject, he recommends individuals" to ally themselves, by preference, with those only who possess, in a characteristic manner, the elements wanting in their own case, in order that, with the common sum of both parents, all the elements of the human constitution may be fairly represented." This reads plausibly, but we have great doubts as to the soundness of the theory upon which the advice. is given. There is in nature an unwillingness (so to speak) to the coupling of extremes, and to the production of wellorganised intermediates from them. Between two animals or plants widely dissimilar-say different genera - nature mostly refuses to produce any intermediate form by their direct union. When different species approach so near to each other in structural characters, that an intermediate or mule progeny can be produced from them, the intermediate progeny is almost always barren, and otherwise defective. When the approximation is close enough for the production of a fertile intermediate progeny, as in varieties of the same species, if the parents be very unlike each other, the offspring either takes decidedly the characteristics of one parent, or exhibits an ungainly combination of some of the excesses and defects of both. The recommendation of uniting opposites is made upon the presumption that the offspring produced will show an average or medium developement; but we understand that breeders of animals do not find this notion hold true in practice; and strongly incline to the opinion, that it is unwise to attempt abrupt changes, for nature appears to exalt or obliterate given peculiarities only by slow steps, that is, in the course of several successive descents.

we

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

V. Physical Education; or, the Nurture and Management of Children, founded on the Study of their Nature and Constitution. By SAMUEL SMILES, Surgeon. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. 1838. Small 8vo. pp. viii. 200.

[ocr errors]

A TREATISE ON Physical (we should prefer to say, Physiological) Education is connected only incidentally with our proper subject, highly important as we must admit the early training

of children to be, in giving health and strength to their mental faculties. Proper Physical Education may be described as that management of the bodies of children which conduces to the most perfect developement of their natural powers; and as the mental powers depend upon a certain part of the body - the brain, the author of this work has chosen an appropriate motto for his title page, in quoting the following words of Paley: "The health and virtue of a child's future life are considerations so superior to all others, that whatever is likely to have the smallest influence upon these, deserves the parent's first attention." A judicious physical education has not only a small, it has a very great, influence on the health and virtue of a child's future life; and therefore is it most richly deserving of every parent's earnest attention. The volume of Mr. Smiles a good deal resembles Dr. Andrew Combe's admirable works on the Principles of Physiology, and on Digestion; but it differs from these, by being expressly devoted to the management of children from their earliest years. It would form a serviceable adjunct or appendix to the works of Dr. Combe; and in this way we can recommend it to any of our readers likely to be concerned in the bringing up of children, or, to borrow a fancy word from our author's pages," manlings." The title page shows the author to be a surgeon, and the book has much of the professional bias about it, but is still perfectly intelligible to persons of ordinary ability and education: indeed some might object to it, as being too verbose and explanatory about trifles; but this fulness we must pronounce rather an excellence than a defect in a work of its kind. Possibly every parent might find ideas elaborately dwelt upon, which have become mere common-places to himself or herself; but if the same ideas have not become common-places to all other parents, then does the author judge well in introducing them. We mean, that what is known to A. may be unknown to B., and, on the contrary, B. may be familiar with ideas which would be novel to A. Hence, the necessity of making every work of instruction complete even in points of minor import

ance.

As examples of the author's manner of treating his subject, we shall make two or three extracts, which may at the same either suggest or revive useful reflections to our readers. How frequently, and yet too often how vainly, have recent authors sought to awaken the public to the evils which spring from the foolish (might it not be said? the wicked) custom of keeping young females in utter ignorance of those organic conditions upon which are to depend their own and their children's future health; until, in the ordinary course of nature, they find

themselves mothers, almost wholly destitute of the knowledge requisite for the proper management of their infants, and are then driven to seek advice from nurses and old women full of the silly prejudices and superstitions of uneducated ignorance! Here is an example of Mr. Smiles's ideas on the same subject:

"But why do not mothers as well as fathers make themselves acquainted in some measure with the physical and mental nature of their offspring, and so be enabled in a great measure to avoid the causes of such decay and consequent suffering? Alas! unfortunately for the young, this part of education is as yet unfashionable. While no showy accomplishment, no matter how trivial, is neglected, and no pains spared for acquiring it, the knowledge of living structure, of the laws of animated nature, though ever before their eyes, is almost studiously avoided; and young females as well as males grow up to womanhood and manhood, in entire ignorance of all that relates to their future condition as parents, and the physical and mental developement of the young, for whose welfare they may yet be so deeply responsible. This is more especially the case with the female part of the community, and inasmuch as it is so, it is the more deeply to be deplored, since the management of the young is their peculiar province, and they are influenced for good or evil through life, by the mother's care of their early growth and developement. Is it, then, to be wondered at, when the young female finds herself a mother, with all this previous ignorance of her own and her infant's frame, from acquaintance with which she has, by prejudice perhaps, been so carefully guarded, that she is kept in a state of painful alarm and apprehension, by the occurrence of the most trifling circumstances; or allows real danger to steal on, in a state of the most fatal because unguarded security? Can we be surprised that, of the remaining half that survive their infancy, so many should carry with them through life the effects of their early maltreatment in a deformed frame and debilitated constitution, to propagate the evils they themselves have endured?" (Page 5-7.)

Our author has some sensible observations on another prevalent error, now much censured by physiological writers, namely, that of cramming young children with book-knowledge, instead of judiciously training, and strengthening, and expanding, their minds; whereby they would eventually become better enabled to acquire, and keep, and use, a much greater extent of real knowledge. In the want of exact and intelligible metaphysical terms, we must write in words of physical application, using them in a figurative sense, and say, that

the mind, like a fruit-tree thrown into early bearing, never attains its full size. The men who have made the greatest figure in life, are almost invariably those who have had little booklearning in their earliest years. The mind of a book-crammed child is stunted, and the grown-up man is rendered almost incapable of filling positions which require any considerable grasp of mind or great vigour of purpose. He may be learned," but he is felt to be feeble; and he usually fails to sustain the position to which he may be raised by the homage of those who at first mistake the signs of learning for the indications of mental vigour. In early life, children should read only about things which they have already seen, instead of being forced to learn words which excite no clear ideas. Were this course adhered to, their brains would rarely be over-tasked. We shall conclude our notice of Mr. Smiles, with another extract, relating to this subject.

"Nature has implanted in children a prying curiosity to learn by means of their senses; to handle and examine everything they can reach, with all the sensation they are as yet endowed with. This instinct, as we may term it, should certainly therefore be satisfied and directed. And while engaged in learning by such a natural process, they exercise all their organs equally, their physical structure, their senses, and their observing faculties; thus, too, acquiring a greater amount of actual knowledge* than could be instilled into them by the most laborious drilling by means of printed books. The conduct and behaviour towards the child, of his nurse or parent, is to him a book; the actions and conversation of those around him, is a book; all nature, indeed, is a book; and from all these sources he is almost incessantly engaged in storing up information and ideas, not mere transient sounds, but actual impressions, such as are best fitted for his slender capacity, and constitute the only intellectual food by which his mind is as yet capable of being nourished..... From moral as well as physical impressions, knowledge is acquired at first hand, as it were, while from written books it is at second hand, and by a routine which children cannot as yet comprehend. They present to children the shadow nature itself is the substance." (Page 195.)

The advantage is rather in the greater accuracy of observation and reasoning thus induced, and therefore an improved capacity for acquiring future knowledge, than in the amount of knowledge per se. Books contain the accumulated information of many; experience is only individual information, less in quantity, but superior in permanence and accuracy in the mind of a child. — EDITOR P. J.

« ПредишнаНапред »