A Journal of Ten Weeks' Tour of Visitation among the Colonists and Zulu Kafirs of Natal. With a Map and Illustrations. Second Edition. Fcp. 8vo. cloth, 58. FOUR SERMONS ON ORDINATION AND ON MISSIONS. 18mo. sewed, 18. A LETTER TO THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY Upon the Proper Treatment of the case of Polygamist Converts from Heathenism. Second Edition. 1s. 6d. THE EPISTLE OF ST. PAUL TO THE ROMANS Newly Translated, and Explained from a Missionary Point of View. Fcp. 8vo. cloth, 78. 6d. MACMILLAN and CO. Cambridge and London. THE PENTATEUCH AND BOOK OF JOSHUA PART I. The Pentateuch Examined as an Historical Narrative. Fifth Edition, revised. 8vo. cloth, 6s. PART II. The Age and Authorship of the Pentateuch considered. Second Edition, revised and enlarged. 8vo. cloth, 7s. 6d. NOTES ON DR. M'CAUL'S 'EXAMINATION' OF PART I. Price 18. A FRENCH PASTOR'S ESTIMATE Of Parts I and II of Bishop COLENSO's Work on the Pentateuch. Translated from Le Disciple de Jésus-Christ, Revue du Protestantisme au XIXe THE CONFESSIONS OF A MISSIONARY, Being a Defence of Bishop COLENSO, from the French of EDMOND SCHERER. Extracted from the Revue des Deux Mondes, March 2, 1863. With a Preface, in Reply to the Letters of the Rev. F. D. MAURICE on 'The Claims of the Bible and of Science,' by Presbyter ANGLICANUS. LONGMAN and CO. London. THE PENTATEUCH AND BOOK OF JOSHUA CRITICALLY EXAMINED BY THE RIGHT REV. JOHN WILLIAM COLENSO, D.D. BISHOP OF NATAL. 'We can do nothing against the Truth, but for the Truth.'-St. Paul, 2 Cor. xiii. 8. 'Not to exceed, and not to fall short of, facts,-not to add, and not to take away,-to state the truth, PART III. LONDON: LONGMAN, GREEN, LONGMAN, ROBERTS, & GREEN. The right of translation is reserved. 222 2674 1862 PREFACE. In this Third Part of my work I had intended, as I said in Part II, to enter into a close examination of the book of Genesis, and seek to assign the different parts of it, with such degree of probability as the case admits of, to their respective authors.' I had also stated that in Part III we should have to 'consider at length' the questions affecting the origin of the book of Deuteronomy, in order to be able to detect the passages due to its author in the books of Genesis, Exodus, &c.' I have found it necessary, however, in this Part to confine myself to the latter portion of my proposed undertaking, in order that I might do the work required more thoroughly, and place the evidence, in as clear and complete a form as possible, before the eyes of my readers. It seemed of the more importance to do this, and to confine attention for the present to this particular point, inasmuch as the evidence in this case is so very distinct and decisive, that, if I carry my readers with me here, I shall have, in effect, accomplished my main object in these criticisms, and cleared the way, at all events, for an intelligent and unbiassed examination of the whole question. I will here state briefly the course of argument which has been followed, and the results which have been arrived at, in |