Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub

came so accustomed to darkness, that at last they preferred it to the Light of Life, when he appeared among them. The lesson conveyed by the vision was thus lost upon the Jews. They thought that they could do without the olive-trees, or could do equally well with olive-trees of their own planting; and most calamitous was the result. But is not the vision equally instructive to us, or indeed doubly so, as we see the evil consequences of disregarding it? There is now a great desire to do good, to spread the knowledge of the truth, and to stop the torrent of ungodliness and indifference that threatens to overwhelm us: but let us not forget that this spiritual work is not to be accomplished by might nor by power, but by the Spirit of the Lord of Hosts, and that this Spirit is not to be had except through the divinely appointed channels. The heavenly oil flows only from the olive-trees of God's own planting. The monarchy and the priesthood are these two olive-trees: it is vain, therefore, to look for the communication of divine grace from other sources; and yet the so-called Christian world appears to have forgotten this first principle. The monarchy and the state are looked upon as mere worldly ordinances, and therefore mere worldly men, no matter what their creed, or whether they have none, are looked upon as fit and proper persons to hold the subordinate office of legislation; and men hope, whilst they are trying to make the state a kingdom of Satan, that they will make the world the kingdom of God. In like manner, they endeavour to set aside the office of the Christian priesthood, and think to spread spiritual religion by men whose divine commission is just as genuine as that of the Pharisees. In fact, Pharisaism is revived, and once more in full operation. If it become general, the present lay system will lead to the same results as those brought about by its Pharisaic architype, the candlestick will be separated from the olive-branch, and the light of its lamps soon extinguished.

Some may perhaps think that the vision of Zechariah, though very good for the Jews, does not apply to our times and to the Christian Church. No doubt it is very convenient for some to deny or get rid of the authority of the Old Testament; but such evasion will not serve them here. The very same figure occurs in the New Testament. Christian Churches are also represented by the symbol of golden candlesticks (Rev. i. 20); and in the eleventh chapter of that book a vision similar to Zechariah's is again. given, and of the two witnesses it is said, "These are the two olive-trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth." Now, whatever be the interpretation of that passage,

the similarity of the vision shews us at least this much, that a vision necessary for the Jewish Church may be equally needful for the times of the New Testament. Not that we need the language of the vision to prove our point, which is just as well proved from the unprophetic parts of the New Testament. In the first place, the New Testament contains no proof that the Holy Spirit was communicated by unauthorised teachers. By the laying on of the hands of the Apostles it was communicated. There are two remarkable instances in which God was pleased especially to recognise and honour the ministry of his own appointment, by calling in their mediation. One is that of Cornelius, who, though a devout man, whose prayers and alms had gone up as a memorial before God, yet was not visited with the outpouring of the Holy Spirit until the Apostle came and preached to him the word of God. The other the case of St. Paul, who, though miraculously stopped by the Lord himself, received not the gift of the Spirit until a divinely commissioned messenger laid his hands upon him. St. Paul also teaches us plainly, that the edification of the Church of Christ is to be expected only through the ministration of those teachers whom God has given. "But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ; wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.... And he gave some apostles; and some prophets; and some evangelists; and some pas tors and teachers; for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ: that we be henceforth no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive." (Eph. iv. 7-13.) Now, if God gives teachers, there must be some way of finding out who they are, and they must have some credentials to establish the truth of their claims. The Pharisees of old, and their successors, the rabbinical Jews, make religious knowledge this test. Though such professed sticklers for the law of Moses, and even for the letter of that law, they totally disregard the claims of the priests and Levites, to whom God committed the office of teaching, unless they happen to possess that sort of religious knowledge which they consider the truth. The Jews have now, therefore, no clergyman : any man, no matter what his business or occupation, if he have only acquired the re

quisite quantum of knowledge, may become a rabbi or teacher in Israel. In fact, rabbinical Judaism presents the completest system of unauthorised lay-teaching now to be found. But is it attended with God's blessing? The lay-teaching of the Pharisees led the Jews to reject the Lord Jesus Christ, and the lay-teaching of the Rabbis confirms their posterity in error. The lay-teaching of the Pharisees destroyed the Church and Temple, and scattered Israel through the world.

Let

from secular employment, and as affording peculiar opportunities of communion with God, as a day when a favourite preacher will be heard. I do not mean to assert, that it is not of the last importance that men should hear the truth of the Gospel plainly set before them; unquestionably it is: but it is certainly a point of secondary importance from whom the truth is heard. The very humblest productions of an earnest labourer in the vineyard, not blessed with extraordinary powers, are often the means of doing far more good than the most highly wrought compositions of men of the highest talent. We must beware, lest we deceive ourselves on this point, and confound a restless anxiety to "hear some new thing," with the sober and serious desire of being made wise unto salvation.

Impressed with the importance of the remarks in your fourth Number, I beg to transmit for insertion in a work to which you have already adverted, Mein your pages a letter on this subject, contained moirs of the Rev. G. T. Bedell. This eminent servant of God seems to have deeply deplored the spirit referred to, and to have traced to it many most lament able results.

I am your constant reader,

OXONIENSIS.

as then learn from this fearful example. If We wish to promote the knowledge of salvation amongst the people of this land, let us beware of attempting it on Pharisaic principles; let us not think that religious knowledge, even though accompanied with an earnest desire to do good, is a sufficient qualification for a teacher. Paul may plant, and Apollos water; but God alone can give the increase. But God will not bless those means which men invent for themselves. He will not join with men in offering disrespect to his own institutions. Ten thousand or a hundred thousand unauthorised lay-teachers, though ever so diligent and earnest, will not make the lamps of the golden candlestick burn brighter. For this the heavenly oil is required, and that can be had only from the two olive-branches which God hath planted. If we therefore really desire to promote true religion, and to spread the kingdom of Christ, let us pray that the olive-branches may flourish, that God may supply them with sap. Let us do what in us lies to promote the spiritual welfare of the State and the Church. Let us use that portion of power which God hath committed to us, to select men full of faith and the Holy Ghost for all offices which are elective. Let us contribute to the building and endowment of churches. Let us uphold propagate the true Bible principles of State and Church, and let us every where discountenance the lay-system of the Pha-pelled to say, that I felt as if it might be my duty to

Dearly beloved Brethren,-It is probable that most of you are aware that it will not be in my power to attend to the usual evening services of our Church until the weather shall become more settled. Having suffered much this season from exposure to the night

and

risees.

REV. G. T. BEDELL.

A. M.

To the Editors of the Church of England Magazine. Your fourth Number contained an essay "On the temper with which the ministry of the Gospel should be received;" a subject which well deserves the serious consideration of not a few, who, led away, it is to be feared,

by a sincere desire for spiritual improvement, are too apt to despise, or at least to disregard, the ministrations of those who, however sincerely devoted to their Master's work, and faithful in their inculcation of Scripture truth, may be deficient in oratorical powers. The Christian minister is, indeed, often pained to behold this desire for intellectual gratification, rather than for real advancement in Christian knowledge, among many members of his flock; and he will feel it an imperative duty to point out the danger likely to result from it. The Sabbath is too often anticipated with pleasure, not so much as a day of holy rest

air, in consequence of the peculiar severity of the winter, my physician, in whose judgment I place implicit confidence, has thought it best that I should not attempt my customary duties on Friday evenings, until I can do it with more probable safety to myself. To this arrangement I submit, because I feel that my own most earnest desires are not to be put into competition with the medical advice formed on mature deliberation. God be praised! I feel that my health is very materially improved from what it was three weeks ago; and I rejoice in the prospect of not being prevented from discharging my duties on the Lord's day.

When I found that I should be compelled to relinquish the idea of lecturing, for the space of at least five or six weeks, my mind became painfully exercised as to what was the course of my duty in relation to the Friday evening lecture. I regret to be com

close the lectures, because I did fear the attendance might be so diminished as to be observed by those who would kindly assist me in the period of my absence. On mature reflection, however, I came to the conclusion, that, let those who were accustomed to attend take what course they would, it was my obvious duty not to close up the opportunity of religious instruction. The intention of this pastoral letter is to express my opinion on a subject, that has never ceased to give uneasiness to my mind, viz. the unchristian disposition manifested by many, to forsake the instruction of the Lord's house whenever the preacher may not be one who, in all respects, may gratify their tastes. This is an unwholesome state of feeling, which I have long known to exist among ourselves to a considerable extent, and which cannot be too strongly reprobated, as inconsistent with a right state of feeling towards the worship and the word of God. Where the minister who preaches is known, and believed to preach

the truth as it is in Jesus, there is no excuse which can justify a feeling of dislike to his ministrations. It is a direct and positive proof of the want of a sound spiritual state. Under no circumstances, unless the character of the minister be such as may not be approved, or unless he is not believed to deliver the message of the Gospel in simplicity and godly sincerity, is it justifiable to feel a disrelish to his ministrations. And though it is natural, and cannot be avoided, to be more gratified with one than with another, yet, whenever providential circumstances place a minister before the people, reverence for the word of God ought to ensure him a respectful attention.

I have felt these things most painfully, because I have seen and known many who will not attend either on Sundays, or at the lectures, unless they are first assured who is to be the preacher. This is peculiarly distressing to myself, because when any of my brethren in the ministry assist me, it is purely because they desire to render me the aid which my health requires ; and what ought to give me more pain than the reflection, that my own people are not willing to appreciate the services done from a spirit of kindness to their own minister? I am happy to say, that, both in relation to the services on Sundays, and in relation to these lectures, there has been a manifest improvement, and apparently a much better state of feeling than formerly existed. And I do not write these things so much to complain of what at present exists, as I do to caution you on a subject which, I fear, is not so much thought of as it should be. Especially by those accustomed to attend the lectures, and still more particularly by those who are the professing members of this Church, I expect a course of conduct conformable to the Gospel. Let them be in their places, just as if I were to be there; let them give heed to the message, just as if I had been so highly privileged as to deliver it. It. is in this way alone that a blessing can be expected. And I hardly need to say, that it is in this way alone that my feelings can be gratified. Let me but see that the services of my dear brethren, who kindly assist me, are duly appreciated, and I shall then take pleasure in addressing you, when, in the mercy of God, I may again be permitted to resume the lectures myself; but it will be with pain that I shall come back, if I find that the attendance in the meantime has been much diminished.

It is my anxious desire for your spiritual welfare, brethren, which has led me to touch, even lightly as I have, on this subject. But I do wish my beloved people, under all circumstances, to love and honour the Gospel for the Gospel's sake, and to feel that they are highly distinguished by God in being permitted to hear the Gospel in its purity; and let me beseech you all to seck to profit by that preaching, and earnestly to take heed to the things which you hear, lest at any time you should let them slip. Whether it is I, your minister set over you in the Lord, or whether it is any one of my brethren, whose good will to me has induced them to consent to this duty, who addresses you, oh, let the Gospel be mixed with faith, so that, instead of being a savour of death unto death, it may be a savour of life unto life. Too long have

very many of you neglected the things which concern your everlasting peace; too long have you misused the mercies of God; too long have you trampled under foot the love of a Saviour. I pray you, cease from these things, and return unto the Lord. In this your day of merciful visitation, he stands ready to receive you, and pardon your sins, and forgive you freely. May the Lord have you in his holy keeping; may he lift up the light of his countenance upon you, and give you peace here, and happiness hereafter, is the prayer, through Jesus Christ, of

Your affectionate friend and pastor.

Biography.

LIFE OF CRANMER.

[Conclusion.]

THE Articles being finished, Cranmer's attention was employed upon the design of establishing a code of canon law, which was afterwards published, under the title of Reformatio Legum Ecclesiasticarum, a book, which, though it has never possessed public authority, has often been appealed to as a record of very great importance. It has frequently been quoted in parliament and the law-courts, to illustrate points of ecclesiastical jurisprudence; and has been often brought forward by our divines, as a comment on the Articles of Religion. There is a manuscript copy of this code, which belonged to Cranmer, in the British Museum. The archbishop, in the autumn of 1552, received a commission from the council to examine a sect, newly sprung up in the county of Kent, holding some blasphemous and absurd tenets: he was also directed to find out who they were that had embezzled the plate and goods belonging to churches and chantries which had been given to the king, and which they had converted to their own use. In this latter commission, however, he avoided acting, because he felt sure that whatever he might possibly recover would not pass into the hands of the king, but into those of the rapacious Duke of Northumberland and his friends. He accordingly wrote to Cecil, with whom he was very intimate, excusing himself on the ground of the absence of those who were to have worked with him in the commission. The health of Edward was now declining; and Northumberland, anxious to place the crown on the head of his son's wife, Lady Jane Grey, represented to the king, with wicked dissimulation, the illegitimacy of Mary and Elizabeth, and the danger in which the Church would be, if his successor should not maintain the established religion. "Of a religious and good prince," he insinuatingly remarked, "it was the duty not to regard the regular lineage, when the glory of God, and the good of his subjects, might be endangered; nor could he be able, if he acted otherwise, to answer it before God." He obtained the consent of the dying sovereign. Cranmer argued repeatedly with the young king against this illegal proceeding; and if he had been permitted to converse with him alone, he might have prevailed; but Northumberland took care to prevent this; and Cranmer, at last, assented; but so reluctantly, that his enemies admit he was compelled to it: and never, during all the days of reproach and suffering through

which he afterwards passed, was his share in this This was intended as a disrespect, but proved a great transaction an ingredient in his cup of rebuke.

[ocr errors]

After Edward's death, the sceptre remained in the hands of Lady Jane Grey for eleven days at the end of which time, Mary commenced her reign; and with that event began the troubles of Cranmer. It was reparted that he had offered to chant the mass and requiem at the funeral of King Edward; and that he had already restored mass in his cathedral at Canterbary. Mass was restored there, it is true, but not by Cranmer: it was the vice-dean, Dr. Thornden, who had done this, but without the archbishop's consent or knowledge." But the aforesaid slanderous report says Strype) so troubled the archbishop, that, to stay it, he wrote a letter to a friend of his, that he never made any promise of saying mass, nor that he did set the mass in Canterbury; but that it was done by a se, flattering, lying monk, Dr. Thornden (such a character, in his just anger, he gave him), who was iragan of Dover, and vice-dean of that church, in the absence of Dr. Wotton, who was then abroad in mbassy. This Thornden (continues Strype) was a man having neither wit, learning, nor honesty. And yet his wit is very ready: for he preacheth as well extempore as at a year's warning: so learnedly, that no an can tell what he chiefly intendeth, or goeth about to prove: so aptly, that a gross of points is not suffiant to tie his sermon together: not unlike to Jodocus, a monk, of whom Erasmus maketh mention in his Chouies, who, if he were not garnished with these picious titles, monk, doctor, vice-dean, and suffragan, were worthy to walk openly in the streets with a bell and cock's-comb."

document,

consolation, a circumstance of which Latimer reminded the queen's commissioners at Oxford: "Mr. Cranmer," said he, "archbishop of Canterbury; Mr. Ridley, bishop of London; that holy man, Mr. Bradford; and I, old Hugh Latimer, were imprisoned in the Tower of London for Christ's Gospel preaching; and for because we would not go a-massing, every one in close prison from other, the same tower being so full of other prisoners, we four were thrust into one chamber, as men not to be accounted of. But, God be thanked, to our great joy and comfort, there did we together read over the New Testament, with great deliberation and painful study; and, I assure you, as I will answer before the tribunal of God's majesty, we could find in the Testament of Christ's body and blood none other presence but a spiritual presence, nor that the mass was any sacrifice for sin. But, in that heavenly book it appeared, that the sacrifice which Christ Jesus our Redeemer did upon the cross, was perfect, holy, and good; that God the heavenly Father did require none other, nor that ever again to be done."

In the year 1553, Mary, who had given out that "she meant graciously not to compel or strain other men's consciences, otherwise than God should, as she trusted, put in their hearts a persuasion of the truth through the opening of his word unto them," published a proclamation, in which, after artfully repeating the above concession, she adds, "until such time, as further order, by common consent, may be taken therein." Resolving, therefore, at the instigation of Gardiner (who was now chancellor of Cambridge), to silence the

Cranmer drew up a declaration of his innocence of reformed clergy, she summoned several distinguished
this charge of having restored mass. It is a curious
and may be found in Strype's History.
While this manifesto was in circulation, Cranmer was
summoned to appear before the queen's commissioners,
sad to bring with him an inventory of his goods, which
be did at the beginning of August, 1553, receiving a
command not to depart from his palace, and to be forth-
coming when called. He settled his affairs, paid his
debts, and prepared for the worst, exclaiming, says
Fex, "that he was now his own man, and, with the
help of God, was ready to meet any adversity." His
resolution had no sooner been formed, than he was a
second time brought before the lords of the council,
who sent him to the Tower, partly for setting his hand
to the instrument of Lady Jane Grey's succession, and
partly for having publicly offered to justify openly the
religious proceedings of the late king. On the thir-
teenth of November he was adjudged guilty of high
treason; he was, however, pardoned for having been
a traitor, but left to suffer for the crime of heresy. The
archbishop, who was permitted to see Lady Jane Grey
in the prison, strengthened her resistance to the at-
tempts made by Mary to convert her to the Romish
faith: but in this she was firm. "Should I (said she),
who am young and in the flower of my years, forsake
my faith for love of life? Nay, God forbid." The
archbishop had for his fellow-prisoners Ridley, Brad-
ford, and Latimer. The prison was soon crowded with
other victims; and the four arrested Protestants, to
each of whom at the first a separate apartment was
allotted were now placed together in a single room,

bishops and clergy to appear before the, council.
Hooper, afterwards the martyr, was immediately com-
mitted to the Fleet prison; and Myles Coverdale,
bishop of Exeter, (the celebrated publisher of the
English Bible three centuries ago,) was deprived of
his see.
A convocation afterwards met at St. Paul's
by the queen's order, to settle the doctrine of the real
presence of Christ's body and blood in the Lord's sup-
per. Dr. Weston, dean of Westminster, who presided,
and all the rest of the assembly, except five or six,
maintained the bodily presence of Christ in that sacra-
ment; but finding that the three bishops were an
overmatch for them in argument, they procured their
removal from the prison to Oxford, when it was in-
tended they should enter the lists with a select body of
popish disputants. This meeting at Oxford did not
take place until April in the following year.

The lieutenant of the Tower was directed "to deliver to Sir John Williams the bodies of the late archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Ridley, and Mr. Latimer, to be by him conveyed to Oxford." On the fourteenth of April they were led from the common prison in Oxford, called Bocardo, to meet their opponents in St. Mary's church. Weston opened the commission in a plausible speech, in which he dwelt on the happiness of religious unity; and ended his harangue by holding out to Cranmer a paper, saying, “We hope you will have no objection to subscribe these articles." He read the statement, which contained the doctrine of the real presence of Christ's body and blood in the Lord's supper, shook his head, and said he feared that that

paper would not afford just grounds for the desired unity. He was then remanded to prison; and two days after, Cranmer and the others were brought before the commissioners, and asked whether they would subscribe the articles: they refused to do so, and were condemned as heretics. From this sentence the archbishop appealed to the just judgment of the Almighty. A year elapsed, before the sentence of condemnation, that had been pronounced against Cranmer and his friends, was put in force. They had acted without the pope's authority in the late proceeding, and must, therefore, obtain a new commission from Rome. In this afflicting interval, whilst they were denied even the very necessaries of life, "they had comforts (says one of Cranmer's biographers) in their own hearts, which as the world could not give, so neither could it take away. He in whose shadow they had formerly trusted, had not deserted them in this time of need. They were, indeed, troubled on every side, but not distressed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed;' and thus, though shut out from all mortal help, their language breathed resignation and hope; and they were enabled to give encouragement and comfort to their fellow-sufferers." Nor were the hours of solitude spent in idleness. Latimer deliberately read the New Testament seven times through, considering and proving the principles of his faith. Ridley employed himself in composition with increased earnestness; and Cranmer laboured with indefatigable diligence in his vindication of his writings upon the sacrament, against Gardiner-a work that he was extremely anxious to finish before his death, and of which he was able to conclude a very elegant Latin translation. Such is the triumph of religion. In the day of prosperity the sinner appears to have equal, if not in many instances superior, advantages over the believer. He enjoys whatever his soul lusteth after; he owns no restriction in his pleasures, but seizes every gratification that blooms in his path, undisturbed by the fear of God, or of a future day of retribution. But in the night of adversity the case becomes very different, "Light springeth up in the darkness to the righteous ;" and, conscious that he is in the hand of Him who does not behold the fall of the sparrow unnoticed, and who has promised to be with him to the end of the world, he rises above all earthly fears; and every fresh act of human malice serves only to make him desire more earnestly the sanctuary that is provided for him in the bosom of his Saviour and his God. The sinner, on the contrary, driven from his strongholds of iniquity, reads nothing but retributive justice in his afflictions; he beholds with dismay the destruction of the gourd in which he had rejoiced; and, seeing himself deserted by the idols in which he trusted, his terrified imagination presents him with no retreat to fly to for safety, and nothing to expect but a fiery looking-for of indignation from his insulted Maker.

The new commission from Rome being received, Brookes, bishop of Gloucester, opened the proceedings with a speech, in which he reminded the archbishop of the low origin from which he had risen, and the high degree whence he had fallen, lower and lower, and now to the lowest degree of all, to the end of honour and life. "If the light of your candle," said

he, "be dusky, your candlestick is like to be removed, and have a great fall; so low that it be quite out of God's favour, and past all hope of recovery: for in hell is no redemption. The danger whereof being so great, very pity causeth me to say, Remember from whence thou hast fallen! I add also, and whither you fall." He then exhorted him to renounce his errors, assuring him that he had been spared for his treason, in hope of his amendment; and that if he were converted, it were ten to one, that though he had been metropolitan of England, he should be as well still,

and rather better.

Cranmer then made his defence, at great length, uttering no invective against any one, but boldly and clearly justifying his own opinions and conduct. He was finally cited to appear at Rome, in person, within eighty days--a mere form and mockery; for his enemies made it impossible he should do so, by detaining him in prison. Not appearing, however, at Rome, he was declared contumacious; and a commission was sent over to England to degrade him, and give him up to the secular power.

Thirlby, bishop of Ely, and Bonner, were appointed to perform this ceremony: the former had been his old and familiar friend, and had received many and great kindnesses from his hands: his tears and emotions shewed that, at least, he remembered this. To make the mockery more complete, they arrayed him in an archbishop's robes, not made of the usual materials, but of rags and canvass; and thus they exhibited him, with a mock mitre and pall, and a crosier in his hand, in St. Mary's church; the malignant Bonner exclaiming, "This is the man that has despised the pope, and is now to be judged by him! This is the man that hath pulled down so many churches, and now is come to be judged in a church! This is the man that condemned the blessed sacrament, and now is come to be condemned before that sacrament!" So grossly abusive was he, that even Thirlby pulled him often by the sleeve to make him desist. They now hastened to disrobe him: he made no opposition till they came to take the crosier out of his hand he held it fast: the crosier was the last insignia of an office he had long and honourably held, and he could not resign it without a pang." Instead of yielding it, he delivered a paper, containing an appeal to a general council. His hair was then cut close round, and the bishops scraped the tops of his fingers where he had been anointed: he was then dressed in a yeoman's thread-bare gown and a townsman's cap, and sent back to prison.

[ocr errors]

It is most painful, as we draw near to the close of this memoir, to feel that we have to record an event in which Cranmer seriously fell. But truth compels us to confess that he did fall. Some, perhaps from sincere attachment to him, and others in the hope of prevailing with a mind naturally timid," tried to make him recant his principles; and there is little doubt that he signed, at all events, an equivocal recantation. Bonner prepared five papers, in which Cranmer was made to vilify himself as a mischief-maker and blasphemer. "That he erred," says a biographer, "is only too certain they who are most eminent in virtue, and whom experience has taught how weak the heart of the best man in reality is, will pity his degradation,

« ПредишнаНапред »