Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub

Langton his usual energy. Dr. Adam Smith, who was present, observed, in his decisive professorial manner, 'Very well,-very well.' Johnson, however, added, 'Yes, they are very well, sir; but you may observe in what manner they are well. They are the forcible verses of a man of a strong mind, but not accustomed to write verse; for there is some uncouthness in the expression'.'

"Drinking tea one day at Garrick's with Mr. Lang

"Who studies ancient laws and rites,
Tongues, arts, and arms, and history,
Must drudge, like Seldon, days and nights,
And in the endless labour die.

"Who travels in religious jars,

(Truth mixt with errour, shades with rays,)
Like Whiston, wanting pyx or stars,
In ocean wide or sinks or strays.

"But grant our hero's hope long toil

66

And comprehensive genius crown,
All sciences, all arts his spoil,

Yet what reward, or what renown?

Envy, innate in vulgar souls,

Envy steps in and stops his rise;
Envy with poison'd tarnish fouls

His lustre, and his worth decries.
"He lives inglorious or in want,

To college and old books confined;
Instead of learn'd, he's call'd pedant;
Dunces advanced, he 's left behind;
Yet left content, a genuine stoick he

Great without patron, rich without South Sea."-Boswell.

A different, and probably a more accurate copy of these spirited verses is to be found in "The Grove, or a Collection of Original Poems and Translations," &c. 1721. In this miscellany the last stanza, which in Dodsley's copy unquestionably uncouth, is thus exhibited:

"Inglorious or by wants enthrall'd,

To college and old books confined,
A pedant from his learning call'd,

Dunces advanced, he's left behind."-J. Boswell.

is

1 The difference between Johnson and Smith is apparent even in this slight instance. Smith was a man of extraordinary application, and had his mind crowded with all manner of subjects; but the force, acuteness, and vivacity of Johnson were not to be found there. He had book-making so much in his thoughts, and was so chary of what might be turned to account in that way, that he once said to Sir Joshua Reynolds, that he made it a rule, when in company, never to talk of what he understood. Beauclerk had for a short time a pretty high opinion of Smith's conversation. Garrick, after listening to him for a while, as to one of whom his expectations had been raised, turned slily to a friend, and whispered him, "What say you to this?-eh? Flabby, I think."

-BOSWELL.

ton, he was questioned if he was not somewhat of a Langton heretick as to Shakspeare. Said Garrick, I doubt he

is a little of an infidel.'

Sir,' said Johnson, I will

stand by the lines I have written on Shakspeare in my prologue at the opening of your theatre.' Langton suggested, that in the line,

'And panting Time toil'd after him in vain,'

Mr.

Johnson might have had in his eye the passage in the Tempest,' where Prospero says of Miranda,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small]

Johnson said nothing. Garrick then ventured to observe, 'I do not think that the happiest line in the praise of Shakspeare.' Johnson exclaimed (smiling), 'Prosaical rogues! next time I write, I'll make both time and space pant1.'

"It is well known that there was formerly a rude custom for those who were sailing upon the Thames to accost each other as they passed in the most abusive language they could invent; generally, however, with as much satirical humour as they were capable of producing. Addison gives a specimen of this ribaldry in Number 383 of The Spectator,' when Sir Roger de Coverly and he are going to

1 I am sorry to see in the "Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh," vol. ii. “An Essay on the Character of Hamlet," written, I should suppose, by a very young man, though called "Reverend," who speaks with presumptuous petulance of the first literary character of his age. Amidst a cloudy confusion of words (which hath of late too often passed in Scotland for metaphysicks), he thus ventures to criticise one of the noblest lines in our language:-"Dr. Johnson has remarked, that "Time toiled after him in vain.' But I should apprehend, that this is entirely to mistake the character. Time toils after every great man, as well as after Shakspeare. The workings of an ordinary mind keep pace, indeed, with time; they move no faster; they have their beginning, their middle, and their end; but superiour natures can reduce these into a point. They do not, indeed, suppress them; but they suspend, or they lock them up in the breast." The learned society, under whose sanction such gabble is ushered into the world, would do well to offer a premium to any one who will discover its meaning. BOSWELL.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Langton Spring-garden'. Johnson was once eminently successful in this species of contest. A fellow having attacked him with some coarse raillery, Johnson answered him thus, Sir, your wife, under pretence of keeping a bawdy-house, is a receiver of stolen goods.' One evening when he and Mr. Burke and Mr. Langton were in company together, and the admirable scolding of Timon of Athens was mentioned, this instance of Johnson's was quoted, and thought to have at least equal excellence.

"As Johnson always allowed the extraordinary talents of Mr. Burke, so Mr. Burke was fully sensible of the wonderful powers of Johnson. Mr. Langton recollects having passed an evening with both of them, when Mr. Burke repeatedly entered upon topicks which it was evident he would have illustrated with extensive knowledge and richness of expression; but Johnson always seized upon the conversation, in which, however, he acquitted himself in a most masterly manner. As Mr. Burke and Mr. Langton were walking home, Mr. Burke observed that Johnson had been very great that night: Mr. Langton joined in this, but added, he could have wished to hear more from another person (plainly intimating that he meant Mr. Burke). O, no,' said Mr. Burke, 'it is enough for me to have rung the bell to him.'

6

[ocr errors]

"Beauclerk having observed to him of one of their friends, that he was awkward at counting money; 'Why, sir,' said Johnson, I am likewise awkward at counting money. But then, sir, the reason is plain; I have had very little money to count.'

"He had an abhorrence of affectation. Talking of old Mr. Langton, of whom he said, 'Sir, you will seldom see such a gentleman, such are his stores of

[subsumed][ocr errors]

literature', such his knowledge in divinity, and such Langton his exemplary life;' he added, and, sir, he has no grimace, no gesticulation, no bursts of admiration on trivial occasions: he never embraces you with an overacted cordiality.',

66.

Being in company with a gentleman who thought fit to maintain Dr. Berkeley's ingenious philosophy, that nothing exists but as perceived by some mind; when the gentleman was going away, Johnson said to him, Pray, sir, don't leave us; for we may perhaps forget to think of you, and then you will cease to exist.'

"Goldsmith, upon being visited by Johnson one day in the Temple, said to him with a little jealousy of the appearance of his accommodation, 'I shall soon be in better chambers than these.' Johnson at the same time checked him and paid him a handsome compliment, implying that a man of his talents should be above attention to such distinctions,- Nay, sir, never mind that: Nil te quæsiveris extra.

[ocr errors]

"At the time when his pension was granted to him, he said, with a noble literary ambition, 'Had this happened twenty years ago, I should have gone to Constantinople to learn Arabick, as Pococke did.'

"As an instance of the niceness of his taste, though he praised West's translation of Pindar, he pointed out the following passages as faulty, by expressing a circumstance so minute as to detract from the general dignity which should prevail:

"Down then from thy glittering nail,
Take, O Muse, thy Dorian lyre.'

1 [See, however, ante, v. iii. p. 411.—Ed.]

Langton

Piozzi, p. 62.

Langton

"When Mr. Vesey' was proposed as a member of the Literary Club, Mr. Burke began by saying that he was a man of gentle manners. 'Sir,' said Johnson, you need say no more. When you have said a man of gentle manners, you have said enough.'

[Yet he afterwards found that gentle manners alone were not " enough" for when Mrs. Piozzi once asked him concerning the conversational powers of Mr. Vesey, with whom she was unacquainted, "He talked to me," said Johnson," one day at the Club concerning Catiline's conspiracy, so I withdrew my attention and thought about Tom Thumb."]

[ocr errors]

"The late Mr. Fitzherbert told Mr. Langton that Johnson said to him, Sir, a man has no more right to say an uncivil thing, than to act one; no more right to say a rude thing to another than to knock

him down.'

[ocr errors]

"My dear friend, Dr. Bathurst,' said he, with a warmth of approbation, declared he was glad that his father, who was a West India planter, had left his affairs in total ruin, because, having no estate, he was not under the temptation of having slaves.'

"Richardson had little conversation, except about his own works, of which Sir Joshua Reynolds said he was always willing to talk, and glad to have them introduced. Johnson, when he carried Mr. Langton to see him, professed that he could bring him out into conversation, and used this allusive expression, 'Sir, I can make him rear' But he failed; for in

1 The Right Honourable Agmondesham Vesey was elected a member of the Literary Club in 1773, and died August 11th, 1786.-MALONE.

2 [Mrs. Piozzi only says "a gentleman." Mr. Malone's MS. note to the Anecdotes supplies the name. Miss Reynolds also recollects an anecdote of Mr. Vesey's first appearance at the Club, which proves that, however Dr. Johnson may have admired Mr. Vesey's gentle manners, he did not imitate them. “When a gentleman at the Club, on presenting his friend, said, ‹ This, sir, is Mr. Vesey' I see him,' said Dr. Johnson, and immediately turned away." Recollections.-Ed.]

« ПредишнаНапред »