Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub

his dinner. He would not destroy, he said, the aroma of his wine; and after wine had attained a certain age (age uncertain as that of spinsters) it should be drunk, he said, "if only to keep down the interest."

Their business, they said, was of the utmost importance, and they must communicate personally with him. They were directed to a field near the house, where they found our friend at the plow. Accosting him with proper ceremony, they told him the object of their mission was to announce his election as Lieutenant Governor of Connecticut. 'Oh, law!' said he, wiping the perspiration from his brow, 'is that all? Why, I have been Leftenant Governor in my own his Madeira wine and his relationship to John house these twenty years!"

Some one remarking that no newspaper had correctly printed a Latin quotation in one of his letters, and that it required a scholar even to correct proofs: "Doubtless," he replied"but the man of mechanical pursuits, of any engrossing pursuit, can not attend to classical studies can not, indeed, retain what in earlier youth he may have acquired. I find it so. Life is too short for study. One life is required for a complete mastery of ancient classics, of Grecian and Roman lore-another for the full understanding and ready use of English poetry, from Chaucer down to the present time; while another should be devoted to modern sciences. I grow more convinced and more ashamed of my ignorance daily; and I fear that in all my productions I recede more and more from the terse expression of my younger days-that I grow diffuse, and indulge in unnecessary repetition.

"Ward Nicholas B- ," he said, "was a man of fortune, of dignified manners, and of a hospitable character. He had two weaknesses

Quincy Adams. While that gentleman was President, Mr. B- was fortunate enough to entertain him at his country-seat, and invited the most presentable people of the vicinage to meet him-among whom was the parson, the Rev. Mr. ——, a man of no little er-u-di-tion (as Dominie Sampson would call it), and much simplicity of character. He invited, also, distinguished persons from Boston to meet, as his note expressed it, 'my cousin, John Quincy Adams, President of the United States.' In his cellar, while he had many a butt of most delicious wine, there was one particular kind of Madeira he prized above all the rest. 'It had been,' he had often told the parson, ‘all the way from Madeira to the Cape of Good Hope-from the Cape of Good Hope to Calcutta—from Calcutta to Canton, in the East Indies-—from Canton it had been brought back to Calcutta-from Calcutta, by the land-route, to Egypt-and from Egypt to the United States.' A bottle of this wine he was to produce on this occasion, and to make what we would call in New Hampshire a great spread.'

66

"My style was not formed without great care and earnest study of the best authors. I have labored hard upon it, for I early felt the importance of expression to thought. I have rewritten sentence after sentence, and pondered long upon each alteration. For, depend upon it, it is with our thoughts as with our persons-ified. their intrinsic value is mostly undervalued, unless outwardly expressed in an attractive garb. Longinus tells us that the most sublime passage to be found in any language is this in the Bible: 'Let there be light, and there was light:' the greatest effort of power in the tersest and fewest words-the command and the record one exertion of thought. So should we all aim to express things in words."

"Nothing, I believe, is more injurious to health," said Mr. Webster, "than our habit of eating hearty suppers. Many think that if they drink at night they should eat in proportion. Never was sadder mistake. It is the food that we devour at these liberal banquets, not the drink we imbibe, that makes next morning dolorous. It is the canvas-back, the terrapin, and the oysters that murder sleep and put the stomach out of tune. Deep drinking over night is doubtless pernicious: it is doubly so when accompanied with hearty meals."

Mr. Webster himself scarcely ever tasted a mouthful after dinner, unless when abroad-and then only ceremoniously. Nor was he less abstemious in potations. It was seldom he drank any thing save a cup of tea after the wine of VOL. XIII-No. 74.-P

'Well, the guests came, and among others, 'his cousin, John Quincy Adams, the President of the United States.' The viands were good, the conversation entertaining, and the host gratAfter the meats were removed, and the bottles on the table had made their circuits a number of times, our host says, 'Gentlemen, I am about to offer you a glass of wine that I can particularly commend to your kind appreciation. It has been all the way from Madeira to the Cape of Good Hope, from the Cape of Good Hope to Calcutta, from Calcutta to Canton, in the East Indies, from Canton it has been brought back to Calcutta, from Calcutta by the landroute to Egypt, and from Egypt to the United States. I think you will like it.' The guests sipped and tasted, tasted and sipped, sipped and tasted again; and, as in duty bound, pronounced it superb. When the bottle had made its first revolution and reached the host, he was gratified to find that it had not suffered material diminution, no guest, of course, having taken a full glass. But what was his horror, at seeing, on its second course, our friend the Parson pouring the inestimable liquid into a tumbler, and drinking it with absolute nonchalance! In vain he essayed quietly to attract his attention-no hint or pantomimic action could reach the absorbed Parson, who had, indeed, got into a theological controversy with one of his neighbors, and, of course, was totally indifferent to every thing else. Again the bottle

[blocks in formation]

I

"I know nothing of your controversy. did not hear a word of it. It is not that I was speaking of.'

moment to myself as well as of danger to the Union of these States, shoulder to shoulder. I can never forget or refuse to acknowledge their important and vital aid."

"It was from the Democratic party, Sir, you received your chief sympathy and support during that crisis. They rallied round you when old friends hung back or deserted."

"That is true, my friend; for four months after my speech of the 7th of March, scarcely a man in the North of the Whig party, possessing position or influence, ever said, 'God bless you!' Norris, of New Hampshire, a life-time political opponent, alone dared speak for me. I was hunted every where."

pear to be many of them; to which the attendant demon indignantly replied, "Fool! these are all that ever reigned!" If the brute creation were liable to a post-mortem account, no lion, it may safely be said, would escape condign punishment.

LION-SLAYERS AND MAN-EATERS. THE THE King of Beasts, it seems, is, after all, not so very unlike his average human breth"What then, my dear Sir? Was I guilty of ren. Quevedo having asked, when in hell, to some solecism in manners, for you know I am see the place appropriated to kings, was shown country-bred? Did I violate some etiquette?' a small compartment tenanted by a few wretch"D-n etiquette! I beg your pardon, rev-ed spirits. He observed that there did not aperend and dear Sir; but I was not thinking of your manners. But I produced a bottle of wine for my cousin, John Quincy Adams, President of the United States, which had been all the way from Madeira to the Cape of Good Hope, from the Cape of Good Hope to Calcutta, from Calcutta to Canton, in the East Indies, from Canton back to Calcutta by the land-route to Egypt, and from Egypt to the United States. It was the best wine I had in my cellar-the best in the country-and more than a half century old. My cousin, John Quincy Adams, President of the United States, pronounced it superb! and you'

"Go on, my excellent friend.'

"Why you, reverend and dear Sir, when it reached you the second time, poured it out like water IN YOUR TUMBLER!'

"Law!' said the parson, 'is this all? I did not notice the wine particularly; but not seeing any cider on the table, poured this out instead; for my argument had made me very thirsty.'"

Lions are sometimes brave, certainly; but this is nearly all that can be said in their favor. They are thievish, cruel, and treacherous. Between the lion and the cat the difference is in degree only: if puss had strength, she would be brave; if the lion could be throttled by a terrier, he would be an arrant coward. To place the so-called monarch of the desert on a level with such noble animals as the dog, or the horse, or the elephant, or the ox, is as bad as balancing a pickpocket against a bishop.

Where the people who have written cheap natural histories got their notions about the lion, it were hard to say. They draw his picture in fine style: he is brave, magnanimous, noble: he scorns to attack an unprepared enemy, meets the foe face to face, after a roar by way of chal"Rusk, of Texas," said Mr. Webster, about lenge; he will not eat meat killed by any butchthe time he made his great speech on the Com-er but himself; he will not attack man, for promise, “I consider the strongest man in the United States Senate, on the Democratic side. He is no spouter, but he acts; and upon what he says you can rely. He will stand without being tied, and you can attend to your matters, and find him when you return on the same spot where you left him. He has all Achilles's hatred of double dealing:

"He who can think one thing and another tell My soul detests him as the gates of hell.' "His indifference to fame makes him careless, or he would assume the position in the Senate and in the country to which his commanding abilities entitle him.

"It is impossible," continued Mr. Webster, "for me to feel the least acerbity toward such men as Rusk, Cass, Foote, and Dickinson. We have stood by each other in a time of greatest

whom, as his nearest relation, he has a sneaking regard; he will remember a service and requite it, as witness the story of Androcles; he rules like a king in the forest or the desert, holding communion with none of his subjects, and maintaining his throne by force and terror. This is what the clever people say who wrote those delightful books about wild beasts which were the charm of our lives in our days of pinafores and Latin grammars.

It was a sad day for our faith in this pleasant theory when the kilted brute-slayer, Roualeyn Gordon Cumming, wrote that admirable romance of his about his hunting adventures in South Africa. For Mr. Cumming, albeit uncommonly hard to believe when he grasps living hippopotami by the stern muscles and tows them out of water, or ties a boa constrictor round his

[graphic][merged small]

throat by way of neckerchief, no doubt told the truth to the best of his knowledge and experience in respect to the nature of the beasts he hunted; and his verdict on the lion is emphatically unfavorable. Physically, he considers him the most imposing denizen of the woods, and the most symmetrical of quadrupeds; but morally, he describes him as but little superior to the hyena -the only beast with which he lives on intimate and colloquial terms. Like all malefactors, he wakes at night and sleeps by day. His mode of attack is feline; he lies in wait for his prey, and springs upon it unawares. Unless attacked, he will not assail animals superior or equal to him in strength. He lets the tiger, the elephant pass, to spring upon the ox and the gazelle. When he is hungry, he will put up with a man's leg; but as a matter of choice, he would rather fall in with a fat ox, and drink his blood. He roars, certainly, and his roar is a warning to man and beast; but if this be magnanimous, then let us celebrate the magnanimity of the rattlesnake. Even his bravery is not proof against noise, a fire, or a stern, determined eye. Mr. Cumming, sleeping at night in the woods in Southern Africa, could hear the lions roar all night long round his kraal; but once only did the hungry brutes invade the bivouac circle. Another time, standing alone, with an empty gun in his hand, before an enraged lioness, he frightened her off by raising his plaid over his head, waving it, and shouting. Indeed, on most occasions, he found that, in the daytime, prudence was the better part of leonine valor.

It might be difficult to find a better illustration of the real character and habits of the lion than the incident to which allusion has just been made. The day's hunt was long over, and Gordon Cumming was making barley-broth by the side of a poor bivouac fire on a dark windy night. At a short distance a lion's roar had been heard at intervals for some time; it suddenly came nearer and louder, and the Hottentots who were encamped a few yards from Cumming, shouted, "The lion! the lion!" Next minute John Stofolus ran to his master, his eyes bursting from their sockets, and crying, "He has got Hendric; he dragged him away from the fire beside me. I struck him with the burning brands on the head, but he would not let go his hold. O God! Hendric is dead; let us take fire and seek him." It appeared that the unfortunate Hendric had risen from his seat by the fire to drive an ox into the kraal; the lion was close by, watching; when Hendric returned to the fire, the brute followed with cat-like step; and the moment he lay down the lion sprang upon him with a terrific roar. The man was powerless. The lion bit and tore him about the neck and shoulder, feeling for his throat, till it bore him off in its jaws to a bush some forty yards distant. Hendric was not dead; he groaned faintly: "Help me! men! O God! help me!" But his cries soon ceased, as the bones of the poor fellow's neck were heard cracking between the lion's teeth. It was impossible to do any thing that night in consequence of the darkness; but next day a hunt was organized,

and natives set on the lion's track. A part of Hendric's leg was found, and pieces of his coat. Guided partly by these, and partly by the spoor of the lion, the hunters traced him to the border of a stream, where he seemed to have lain down among the dry reeds and trees. Cumming gave orders to loose the dogs, and they found the scent directly. A crash among the reeds followed; the lion was running away. After him galloped the hunters and raced the dogs, till, after two minutes' chase, he turned and stood at bay, growling fiercely with open jaws, and waving his tail angrily. Mr. Cumming confesses that his blood boiled with rage at the sight of him. Clenching his teeth, he rode to within thirty yards, and shouted, "Your time is up, old fellow! Next moment, the lion turned slightly round, exposing his shoulder; a rifle-ball instantly broke it. He fell to the ground, but sprang up again, and tried to advance, when a second shot full in the breast settled his account. Here we have the lion in his true character -stealthy, treacherous, dangerous, and at last brave only when bravery was prudence. Mr. Cumming accounts for the preference shown by this lion for man's flesh over beef by narrating a curious custom of some tribes of Bushmen. They do not bury their dead, but leave them out to be eaten by wild beasts. Now, man's flesh, as might be expected, is far more delicious eating than that of beasts; a lion that has once tasted a human corpse becomes an epicurea man-eater-forever after. It had been the fortune of this lion to light upon some Hottentot corpses: a new light burst upon him; and

hence the ox escaped, and poor Hendric was killed.

Mr. Cumming, as every one knows, hunted South Africa. The northern regions of that continent have lately been hunted by a French sportsman of renown, Lieutenant Jules Gérard, who was so successful that he acquired the soubriquet of "The Lion Slayer"-Le Tueur des Lions. Gérard has lately published his experiences at Paris. They confirm Gordon Cumming's statements with regard to the lion, and contain much interesting anecdote.

The lion is the plague and the curse of the sheep-feeding districts of Algiers. At the time of the French conquest, farmers allowed for him as resignedly as for the exactions of the Bey. So much for the government, so much for the lion, the rest for ourselves; such was the simple calculation of every peasant in Algiers, and as fitness required, the lion's was-the lion's share. Estimating each lion's life at thirty-five years, he cost the province during that period a bagatelle of $45,000 or thereabouts to feed him, independently of the men, women, and children whom he took as a bonne bouche from time to time.

Of course, war was made upon the race. Cumming describes the Boers of the South raising armies to fight the lion, continuing to fire at him after he is dead, and not daring to approach him even when his head is all shot to pieces, till a Hottentot has pulled him by the tail. Nor are the Arabs of the North much bolder or more skillful. Before the French conquest, two kinds of traps were laid for the destructive brute. One was a ditch, dug deep and

[graphic][merged small]
[graphic][merged small]

wide, and covered over with light twigs and earth. On one side of the ditch a hedge was built a few feet high; on the other, at a safe distance, were lodged the cattle. Master lion, snuffing the cattle, would take the hedge for a common inclosure, leap over it, and find himself at the bottom of the deep ditch before he knew any thing. Then all would be noise and commotion. Frightened cattle and sheep would trample each other; men, women, and children would awake, and feast, and shout in frantic delight. When morning came, the rim of the ditch would be crowded with an eager throng. Stones fly, and insults; the women especially exhaust the vocabulary of abuse on the trapped lion. He, hopeless and resigned, gazes fixedly on his captors. There is no terror in his eye; he knows that he can not escape, and makes no effort. Calmly he sits on his haunches while the Arabs fire at him from above. Perhaps a dozen shots are fired without striking a vital part. When the fatal ball does come, the lion looks up for the last time, shakes his head as if to say, What wretched shots you are! then lies down to die. Women stamp on his corpse, and young boys slice his warm heart and eat it.

Sometimes the ditch is covered with a strong flooring of beams; the hunters take their places within, and as the lion passes, fire at him through holes. They are comparatively safe, as the wounded brute never thinks of looking for his enemy beneath his feet.

When a lion could neither be trapped nor waylaid, he was hunted. Thirty or forty strong

men met together, took counsel, decided upon a plan of operations, and sent out their scouts. A system of telegraphic signals was agreed upon. A scout who saw the lion waved the skirt of his burnoose before him with his right hand. If the brute was still, the scout raised his skirt to his head, then let it fall. If he was moving, the burnoose was waved in the corresponding direction. When the lion was found, the hunters followed him up till they met face to face. They then placed their backs against a rock, and stood in line with guns at full cock. In front of the line the lion would march majestically as if he was reviewing the hunters, till, perhaps, he stood within twenty or thirty yards. Then the signal would be given and a volley fired. Usually, the lion was not killed. He was floored, however, and the hunters would rush at him with sword and pistol; the common result of which proceeding would be, that the dying lion would seize one of them in his claws and crush his skull or break his neck with his last effort. When the lion did seize a man, dismay would paralyze his companions. They would retire to consult. At last, one of them, the bravest and coolest, would be deputed to rescue their comrade and finish the lion. He would advance toward the brute. Under the body of the lion the champion saw, perhaps, his mangled friend, the lion's claws in his throat. It was no slight exploit to walk within reach of those claws and fire, almost point-blank, at the animal's ear. Yet, it seems, the feat had been performed, and successfully.

« ПредишнаНапред »