 The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an Injury is ordinarily a question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending It.  The Pacific Reporter - Страница 281919Пълен достъп - Информация за книгата
 | 1878 - 680 страници
...from the steamboat, without the aid of other causes not reasonably to be expected. Held, no error; the true rule is that what is the proximate cause...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it.... | |
 | 1878 - 442 страници
...Hiyyiiu vs. Dewey, 107 Mass. 494; Tent Vs. Thf Toledo, Peoria and Warsaw Railroad Co. , 49 111. 349. ) The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it.... | |
 | Horace Gay Wood - 1886 - 682 страници
...; Hi99ins v. Dewey, 107 id. 494 ; Tent v. The Toledo, Peoria and Warsaw Railroad Co., 49 I11. 340. The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for U,e jury. It is not a question of science or of le9al knowled9e. R is to be determined as a fact, in... | |
 | 1903 - 1112 страници
...relies upon it. 9. SAME— PROXIMATE CAUSE— EXISTENCE OF EVIDENCE— DIRKCTING VERDICT. The question, what is the proximate cause of an injury? is ordinarily a question for the jury. But the burden is always on the plaintiff, in an action for personal injury, to show that the negligence... | |
 | 1895 - 2084 страници
...Judge. JENKINS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts). Without doubt, whether a given act or omission is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for a jury. Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 46Í). This, however, is subject to the well-settled rule that... | |
 | Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - 1882 - 764 страници
...It is said by the supreme court of the United States in M. & St. P. Railway Co.v. Kellogg, supra: " The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the Brown and wife vs. The Chicago, Milwaukee... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1883 - 958 страници
...is said by the Supreme Court of the United States in M. & St. P. Railway Co. v. Ktllogg, supra : " The true rule is that what is the proximate cause...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it."... | |
 | 1884 - 1126 страници
...owned by defendant, and from the. elevator to plaintiff's mill an 1 lumber. The court ruled as follows: The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it.... | |
| |
