Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub
[blocks in formation]

INTRODUCTION

THE KINDS OF CRITICISM

It is probably unnecessary, and might possibly be THE KINDS impertinent, to renew here at any OF CRITICISM. length the old debate between reviewers as reviewers, and reviewers as authors

keep

-the debate whether the reissue of work contributed to periodicals is desirable or not. The plea that half the best prose literature of this century would be inaccessible if the practice had been forbidden, and the retort that anything which can pretend to to keep company with the best literature of the century will be readily relieved from the objection, at once sum up the whole quarrel, and leave it undecided. For my own part, I think that there is a sufficient connection of subject in the following chapters, and I hope that there is a sufficient uniformity of treatment. The former point, as the least important, may be dismissed first. All the literature here discussed is-with the exception of Crabbe's earliest poems, and the late aftermath of Peacock and Borrow-work of one and the same period,

but I have not scrupled to alter phrase or substance where it seemed desirable, and I have in a few places restored passages which had been sacrificed to the usual exigencies of space. In two cases, those of Lockhart and De Quincey, I have thought it best to discuss, in a brief appendix, some questions which have presented themselves since the original publications. In consequence of these alterations and additions as well as for other reasons, it may be convenient to give the dates and places of the original appearance of each essay. They are as follows:

Lockhart, National Review, Aug. 1884. Borrow, Macmillan's Magazine, Jan. 1886. Peacock, do. April 1886. Wilson (under the title of "Christopher North"), do. July 1886. Hazlitt, do. March 1887. Jeffrey, do. August 1887. Moore, do. March 1888. Sydney

Smith, do. May 1888.

Hunt, do. April 1889.

Praed, do. Sept. 1888. Leigh
Crabbe, do. June 1889. Hogg,

do. Sept. 1889. De Quincey, do. June 1890.

The present order is chronological, following the birth-years of the authors discussed.

[blocks in formation]
« ПредишнаНапред »