SUPREME COURt Rule No. 27, as Amended February 21, 1917. RULE 27. The call of the docket will commence on Thursday of the second week of the term and twenty cases per day shall be subject to call. Abstracts and briefs of the appellant or plaintiff in error must be filed in the clerk's office on or before twenty days before the first day of the term at which the cause will stand for hearing, together with proof of service of copies of such abstracts and briefs on the opposite party or his counsel, personally or by mail, except that in all criminal cases proof of service must be had on the Attorney General and the State's attorney of the county in which the case arose, and except, also, that in all civil cases in which the people, any State officer, board, commission, institution or department is a party, proof of service must be had upon the Attorney General and also the State's attorney of the county in which the matter arose, in case such State's attorney appeared of record on behalf of the people or the State officer, board, commission, institution or department in such suit; and in case either the abstract or brief is not filed within the time prescribed, the judgment of the court below will, on the call of the docket, be affirmed. The appellee or defendant in error shall file his brief, with like proof of service, not later than the first day of the term, unless the time for filing the brief of appellant or plaintiff in error shall be extended, in which case he shall have twenty days from the day on which the brief of appellant or plaintiff in error is actually filed. Appellant or plaintiff in error shall then have seven days in which to file a reply brief, with like proof of service, at the expiration of which time the cause will stand for decision and no further printed arguments will be received. Upon good cause shown, further time to file abstracts and briefs of either party may be granted by said court in term time or by any judge thereof in vacation. Table OF CASES REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME. A PAGE. Adolph v. Comrs. of Drainage District. (Farmer, J.)....... 483 Akin v. Akin. (Cartwright, J.).. 447 Alwart Bros. Coal Co. ads. Royal Colliery Co. (Dunn, J.)... 193 Atchison, Top. & S. F. Ry. v. City of Chicago. Blair ads. People. (Farmer, J.).. Block ads. People ex rel. (Dunn, J.). Bradley v. Jenkins. (Farmer, J.).. Brown v. Kamerer. (Cartwright, J.). Brown ads. People ex rel. (Dunn, J.).......... .... 617 382 (Dunn, J.)... 571 (Carter, J.).. 208 242 Buckley ads. City of Lake Forest. (Cooke, J.). C Carr ads. People. (Craig, C. J.).. 125 279 161 69 186 38 262 329 416 PAGE. Chicago, City of, v. Huleatt. 466 Cohn v. Sesti. (Dunn, J.).... Dallas City, City of, ads. Midland Lumber Co. (Cooke, J.). 172 Davies ads. Bartholow. (Dunn, J.) . . . . . 505 Dennett ads. People. (Cartwright, J.).. 43 Highland Park, City of, v. Gail. (Carter, J.) ... Highwood, City of, v. Chi. & Northwest. Ry. (Cartwright, J.) Hillview Drainage and Levee Dist. v. Dowdall. (Farmer, J.) Holmes ads. Boylston. (Craig, C. J.).... Hubbard v. Dunne. (Craig, C. J.)... Industrial Board ads. B., D. & C. R. R. Industrial Board ads. B., D. & C. R. R. Industrial Board ads. Bushnell. (Craig, C. J.) ................ Industrial Board ads. Chicago Dry Kiln Co. Industrial Board ads. Chicago Railways Co. Industrial Board ads. Decatur Ry. and Light Co. Industrial Board ads. Gibson. (Craig, C. J.)............ 73 353 Knickerbocker Ice Co. ads. Novitsky. (Cooke, J.). 102 58 230 Lake Forest, City of, v. Buckley. (Cooke, J.). Langher v. Glos. (Dunn, J.)... Lawrence ads. Wolf. (Carter, J.).. Little v. Bowman. (Cartwright, J.) Lurie ads. People. (Per Curiam.) 630 O'Daniel ads. People ex rel. (Cartwright, J.).. Р 338 132 |