 | Illinois. Appellate Court, James Bolesworth Bradwell - 1878 - 704 страници
...CB & QRR Co. et al. v. Hoyt et al. ultimate control of their joint business enterprise, had no right to act without information to, or consultation with the minority: Story on Part. § 123. The evidence shows that the whole project of soliciting consignments of grain to the Union Elevator... | |
 | Floyd Russell Mechem - 1905 - 1168 страници
...choose wantonly to act without information to or consultation with the minority (Story on Part. sec. 123); but when, as in the present case, the one partner...in requiring him to be consulted by the other two. We do not consider the cases to which we have been referred, holding that one partner has the right... | |
 | Eugene Allen Gilmore - 1908 - 834 страници
...stop the operations of the concern against the views of the majority. We do not say that it would be a bona fide transaction, so as to bind the firm, if...in requiring him to be consulted by the other two. We do not consider the cases to which we have been referred, holding that one partner has the right... | |
 | Eugene Allen Gilmore - 1908 - 832 страници
...stop the operations of the concern against the views of the majority. We do not say that it would be a bona fide transaction, so as to bind the firm, if...in requiring him to be consulted by the other two. We do not consider the cases to which we have been referred, holding that one- partner has the right... | |
 | 1916 - 1380 страници
...choose wantonly to act without information to or consultation with the minority (Story on Part. sec. 123) ; but when, as in the present case, the one partner...in requiring him to be consulted by the other two. . . . Our conclusion is, that the act, being concurred in by two of the partners, was, under the circumstances,... | |
 | Judson Adams Crane - 1923 - 1002 страници
...choose wantonly toacj/' vvif-hpiil- infnrm;itinn tn nr cnmnltntifvp w.ith.Uie. minority (Story" Oil Part. § 123) ; but when, as in the present case, the one partner has given jiolke, -inH expressed hi< dissent in advance, there could be no reason or propriety in ri'qiiiringJiim... | |
| |
We do not say that it would be deemed a bona fide transaction, so as to bind the firm, if the majority choose wantonly to act without information to or consultation with the minority (Story on Part. § 123); but when, as in the present case, the one partner... 