That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this Act to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, company, firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of... Session Laws - Страница 271по South Dakota - 1897Пълен достъп - Информация за книгата
 | Virginia. General Assembly. House of Delegates - 1898
...firm, corporation or locality, or any particular description of traffic in any respect whatsoever, or to subject any particular person, company, firm,...locality, or any particular description of traffic, to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever. " Said Richmond and... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1919
...company, firm, corporation or locality or any particular description of traffic in any respect whatsoever, or to subject any particular person, company, firm,...locality or any particular description of traffic to any undue or unrea1918] GR & IR Co. v. COBBS & MITCHELL. 139 sonable disadvantage or prejudice in any... | |
 | New York (State). Board of Railroad Commissioners - 1907
...firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever, or to subject any particular person, company, firm,...locality, or any particular description of traffic, to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever. Every common carrier... | |
 | Canada - 1860
...of Traffic, in any respect whatsoever, nor shall any such Company subject any particular Company or any particular description of Traffic to any prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever ; And every Railway Company having or working a Railway which forms part of a continuous line of Railway... | |
 | Canada - 1861
...of Traffic, in any respect whatsoever, nor shall any such Company subject any particular Company or any particular description of Traffic to any prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever ; And every Railway Company having or working a Railway which forms part of a continuous line of Railway... | |
 | Québec (Province). - 1869
...description of traltic. in any respect whatsoever, nor shall any company subject any particular company or any particular description of traffic, to any prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever ; and every railway company having or working a railway which forms part of a continuous line of railway,... | |
 | British Columbia - 1890
...description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever, nor shall such company subject any particular company or any particular description of traffic to any prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever; and every railway company having or working a railway which forms part of a continuous line of railway,... | |
 | Pennsylvania. Bureau of Industrial Statistics - 1907
...firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever, or to subject any particular person, company, firm,...locality, or any particular description of traffic, to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever. Every common carrier... | |
 | Iowa. Board of Railroad Commissioners - 1891
...firm, corporation or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever, or to subject any particular person, company, firm,...prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever." The Supreme Courts of Pennsylvania and Illinois have taken broad ground against such discriminations,... | |
 | Iowa. Board of Railroad Commissioners - 1899
...description of traffic in any respect whatsoever, or subject any person, company, firm, corporation or locality or any particular description of traffic,...prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever, but this shall not be construed to prevent any common carrier from giving preference as to time of... | |
| |