« ПредишнаНапред »
EN G L A N D,
THE EARLIEST TIMES
THE DEATH OF GEORGE II.
THE EIGHTH EDITION, CORRECTED.
W.DAVIES; and E. New-
Cromwell, who had secretly solicited A. D. 16:9.
prospects widening as he rose, his first principles of liberty were all lost in the unbounded stretch of power that lay before him. When the peers met on the day appointed in their adjournment, they entered upon business, and sent down some votes to the commons, of which the latter deigned not to take the least notice. In a few days after, the com
mons voted that the house of lords was useless and dangerous, and therefore was to be abolished. They voted it high-treason to acknowledge Charles Stuart, son of the late king, as successor to the throne. A great seal was made, on one side of which were engraven the arms of England and Ireland, which this inscription : « The great seal of England.” On the reverse was represented the house of commons sitting; with this motto : « On the first year of freedom,
by God's blessing restored, 1648.” The forms of all public business were changed from the king's name to that of the keepers of the liberties of England.
The next day they proceeded to try those gallant men, whose attachment to their late sovereign had been the most remarkable. The duke of Hamilton and lord Capel were condemned and executed; the earl of Holland lost his life by a like sentence; the earl of Norwich and sir John Owen were condemned, but afterwards pardoned by the commons.
The Scots, who had in the beginning shown themselves so averse to the royal family, and having, by a long train of successes, totally suppressed all insurrections in its favour, now first began to relent from their various persecutions. Their loyalty began to recurn; and the insolence of the independents, with their victories, served to inflame them still more. The execution of their favourite duke Hamilton also, who was put to death not only contrary to the laws of war, but of nations, was no small vexation; they therefore determined to acknowledge prince Charles for their king. But their love of liberty was still predominant, and seemed to combat with their manifold resentments. At the same
time that they resolved upon raising him to the
Charles, after the death of his father, having
Being now entirely at the mercy of the gloomy and austere zealots who had been the cause of his father's misfortunes, he soon found that he had only exchanged exile for imprisonment. He was surrounded and incessantly importuned by the fanatical clergy, who obtruded their religious instructions, and obliged him to listen to long sermons, in which they seldom failed to stigmatise the late king as a tyrant, to accuse