Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean DramaPrinceton University Press, 8.03.2011 г. - 256 страници Hamlet tells Horatio that there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in his philosophy. In Double Vision, philosopher and literary critic Tzachi Zamir argues that there are more things in Hamlet than are dreamt of--or at least conceded--by most philosophers. Making an original and persuasive case for the philosophical value of literature, Zamir suggests that certain important philosophical insights can be gained only through literature. But such insights cannot be reached if literature is deployed merely as an aesthetic sugaring of a conceptual pill. Philosophical knowledge is not opposed to, but is consonant with, the literariness of literature. By focusing on the experience of reading literature as literature and not philosophy, Zamir sets a theoretical framework for a philosophically oriented literary criticism that will appeal both to philosophers and literary critics. |
Между кориците на книгата
Резултати 1 - 5 от 33.
... position.8 But descriptions of this sort require nothing as intense as involvement with literature. Citing or paraphrasing the appropriate sentences is enough. Appeals to literature's particularity lead to the same objection.9 ...
... positions discussed is clearly insufficient. Qualitatively oriented explanations, therefore, all relate to types of belief formation, to the unique ways in which literature creates beliefs, not to the assessment of those beliefs ...
... position than the abductive/paraductive distinction employed by Warner (1989, pp. 345–54) in or- der to legitimate the inference from examples. Moving from “case to case,” as paraductive reasoning supposes, cannot really circumvent ...
... position regarding the rhetorical interconnec- tions between logos and pathos within the context of literature is that of Wayne Booth (both in Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric ofAssent and in The Company We Keep). 20 These remarks do not ...
... position and that which subscribes to the more ex- treme view. 24 The formulation of the describing/conveying opposition in Shakespearean commen- tary goes back at least to William Richardson in A Philosophical Analysis and Illustration ...
Съдържание
9780691125633_3CH2pdf | 20 |
9780691125633_4CH3pdf | 44 |
9780691125633_5CH4pdf | 63 |
9780691125633_6CH5pdf | 92 |
9780691125633_7CH6pdf | 112 |
9780691125633_8CH7pdf | 129 |
9780691125633_9CH8pdf | 151 |
9780691125633_10CH9pdf | 168 |
9780691125633_11CH10pdf | 183 |
9780691125633_12BIBpdf | 205 |
9780691125633_13INDpdf | 225 |