Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean DramaPrinceton University Press, 8.03.2011 г. - 256 страници Hamlet tells Horatio that there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in his philosophy. In Double Vision, philosopher and literary critic Tzachi Zamir argues that there are more things in Hamlet than are dreamt of--or at least conceded--by most philosophers. Making an original and persuasive case for the philosophical value of literature, Zamir suggests that certain important philosophical insights can be gained only through literature. But such insights cannot be reached if literature is deployed merely as an aesthetic sugaring of a conceptual pill. Philosophical knowledge is not opposed to, but is consonant with, the literariness of literature. By focusing on the experience of reading literature as literature and not philosophy, Zamir sets a theoretical framework for a philosophically oriented literary criticism that will appeal both to philosophers and literary critics. |
Между кориците на книгата
Резултати 1 - 5 от 64.
... means for adjudicating between conflicting claims or enforcing norms. Like theologized money (“my Christian ducats”), law is a vehicle for communication between a Jewish outside and a Christian nexus. Shylock's deployment of law thus ...
... means ruled out (I regard such convergence, if it can be demonstrated, as a strength of the reading, and I will sometimes argue for it through source-play comparisons). But such overlap is in no way essential to the validity of the ...
... means this claim to have a broader scope. I agree with Cavell that epistemological concerns do not exhaust the thoughts, anxieties, and sentiments triggered by weighty philosophical issues. But this cannot mean that the move to ...
... when a philosopher employs such means, this might suggest that he has reached the limits of philosophical discourse. The neo-Platonic tradition of interpreting Plato's myths as expressing the ineffable is 5 EPISTEMOLOGICAL BASIS.
... means of establishing propositions. Aristotle's account of examples and enthymemes in his Rhetoric remains the fountainhead for such theories (although the idea is older). Aristotle argued that in some domains, what we take to be a ...
Съдържание
9780691125633_3CH2pdf | 20 |
9780691125633_4CH3pdf | 44 |
9780691125633_5CH4pdf | 63 |
9780691125633_6CH5pdf | 92 |
9780691125633_7CH6pdf | 112 |
9780691125633_8CH7pdf | 129 |
9780691125633_9CH8pdf | 151 |
9780691125633_10CH9pdf | 168 |
9780691125633_11CH10pdf | 183 |
9780691125633_12BIBpdf | 205 |
9780691125633_13INDpdf | 225 |