Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean DramaPrinceton University Press, 8.03.2011 г. - 256 страници Hamlet tells Horatio that there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in his philosophy. In Double Vision, philosopher and literary critic Tzachi Zamir argues that there are more things in Hamlet than are dreamt of--or at least conceded--by most philosophers. Making an original and persuasive case for the philosophical value of literature, Zamir suggests that certain important philosophical insights can be gained only through literature. But such insights cannot be reached if literature is deployed merely as an aesthetic sugaring of a conceptual pill. Philosophical knowledge is not opposed to, but is consonant with, the literariness of literature. By focusing on the experience of reading literature as literature and not philosophy, Zamir sets a theoretical framework for a philosophically oriented literary criticism that will appeal both to philosophers and literary critics. |
Между кориците на книгата
Резултати 1 - 5 от 92.
... literature. 4. Literature— Philosophy. 5. Literature—History and criticism—Theory, etc. 6. Criticism—Moral and ethical aspects. 7. Literature and morals. I. Title. PR3001.Z36 2007 822.3'3—dc22 2006012108 This book has been composed in ...
... literature is done, and my firsthand acquaintance there with the people doing this work was the best intellectual ... Literature,” and appeared in Metaphilosophy 33 (3), April 2002, pp. 321–36. Earlier versions of chapters four and five ...
... Literature and Aesthetics [“Love Stories: A Reading of Romeo and Juliet,” 1999, pp. 71–98, and “Mature Love: A Reading of Antony and Cleopatra,” 11, 2001, pp. 119–48]. An earlier version of chapter eight originally appeared in Mosaic: A ...
... literature. If its philosophical argument is correct, it is also about epistemology and moral philosophy. If its literary readings are persuasive, it is also about the value of literature. The primary ground for choosing Shakespeare is ...
... literature question that arise when disciplinary concerns are jointly considered. For example, explaining the cognitive gains of literary as opposed to non-literary articulations of the same philosophical insight will typically draw the ...
Съдържание
9780691125633_3CH2pdf | 20 |
9780691125633_4CH3pdf | 44 |
9780691125633_5CH4pdf | 63 |
9780691125633_6CH5pdf | 92 |
9780691125633_7CH6pdf | 112 |
9780691125633_8CH7pdf | 129 |
9780691125633_9CH8pdf | 151 |
9780691125633_10CH9pdf | 168 |
9780691125633_11CH10pdf | 183 |
9780691125633_12BIBpdf | 205 |
225 | |