Finding great comfort in the thought Invited a few friends to dine, To welcome in a quiet way Our grave and ponderous divine. He came he gorged on soup; on trout ;- He ate the cutlets and the tarts, And then groan'd forth, with half-shut eye, A liar, glutton, and a thief— And of the second birth am chief. Yet, in your bosoms deeply hid The same vile thoughts I clearly see,— You'd wish to do as once I did, And drink, and lie, and steal like me.” He stuff'd the apples and the pearsThe nuts he crack'd and gulp'd so quickWith guava, ginger, and such wares, We thought each minute he'd be sick. But of old wine he would not hear, 'Twas the soul's poison he'd declare- For his now cleans'd and reverend hand, "The gloom of sin is on you all ; 66 Your charms" (he looked on Alice Hay), You're broken cisterns. Let us pray." He dwarft us as a dingy hulk, Mud fill'd, on Thames's sludgy tide, With broaden'd bows and shapeless bulk Dwarfs the regatta's pigmy pride. He sat and on the shining row Of Hay's young daughters fixed his stares,And said, "It fill'd his heart with woe To know what wicked thoughts were theirs. He knew what envy, hatred, pride, And darker passions raged within; "If it were true all flesh was grass, The bluest blood of northern earls. Was one great blush from chin to brow. That she was half-inclined to Rome- And thirteenth cup, he waddled home. PART SIXTH. A terrible change comes upon the Parish, and we hate each other amazingly. Sir Smiffle said, "his dander riz," And he was purple with amaze "To think a libeller of his Should have been asked to dine at Gray's 'Twas a hunfriendly hact to do." 'But Gray retorted; Whilk replied; And in another month or two We all took one or other's side. Were fill'd with righteousness and hate, All the thick ankles learn'd to sneer And soon despised the moral law as these! -they fear'd-they couldn't tellmed been lost and vile? Had they no happy thoughts of love, And were they-what they could not speak? Oh! Bessy Bell!-oh! Alice Hay! Trust not such breath with falsehood fraught; That fetid breath would dim for aye The crystal mirror of your thought. That ripens 'neath the Christian sun,. Grow till the autumn's prize be won! The parent's love, the sister's kiss,-- To let his thoughts be eastward drawn, Or as he called it, El Koraun, And frighten'd his poor simple wife By talking of some extra wives, "He knew some Muslim "-on his life, "They led most reputable lives.” And Whilk became a Puseyite, With crimson crosses on his Prayers, And came to Church, as if in spite, She enter'd tents with tracts in hand, And show'd her theologic skill By teaching discord to the band; She soon through all the regiment pass'd, But changed, and ran away at last So different from the sinful old. Of the sweet days that cheer'd our town; JOHN COMPANY'S FAREWELL TO JOHN BULL. MY DEAR JOHN,-In this solemn hour of my dissolution, as Time, the traveller, crosses the bridge between two great epochs, I bequeath to you, in a few hasty, but I trust coherent, sentences, the legacy of my advice. What I have written to you, John, since that great conflict commenced, which has ended, as I ever foreboded it would, in my destruction, has not been written in vain. I never hoped to save myself, John; but I strove mightily to save you to save you from a dreadful blunder, from which there would have been no redemption-to save you from the criminal folly of committing the destinies of India to the hands of a few presumptuous novices, who, in their zeal of party and their lust of place, would have sacrificed the interests of millions of fellow-subjects to the necessities of a Parliamentary majority. You were drifting into that, John, at one time. You were well-nigh persuaded to commit the government of India to the charge of a struggling Minister and a handful of English placemen. I told you that there was a paramount necessity for the erection of a strong independent administrative body between India and the Government of the day. I told you that, if you take from me my governing powers, you must substitute some administrative agency nearly resembling my Court of Directors. I told you that you must have a mixed body, composed partly of the nominees of the Crown, and partly of elected members independent of the Crown. I told you that the Indian element must preponderate in that body; that you must have knowledge, and experience, and freedom from political influences: and I hope that these objects have been obtained. A Council has been created, composed mainly of men of Indian experience and Indian reputation. There is enough of knowledge in the new administration to govern India with success; and I believe that there is enough of independence. Nothing can be said against the men whom you have chosen. I have confidence in LEADENHALL STREET, Aug. 31, 1858. them all. If the Council break down, as I am not sure that it will not, the fault will lie in the system, not in the men. I believe that you will have a fair start, John, and that everything will go smoothly at first. You have many things in your favour. You have a young and promising Minister, with excellent intentions, more than ordinary ability, and a devotion to the public service which renders him unremitting in his attention to business. A statesman, and the son of a statesman, he will know how to turn the knowledge and experience of his colleagues to good account; and he is little likely with arrogance and impetuosity to over-ride the deliberate decisions of a council of fifteen practical men. Left to himself, John, I believe that the First Secretary of State for India would run little risk of coming into violent collision with his council. But will he be left to himself? Can he be left to himself? Will Parliament leave him alone? Are there not men interested in the failure of the present experiment, and therefore determined to accomplish it? Are there not parties, or subdivisions of parties, who, irrespective of the predominance of Whig or Tory (to use the old-fashioned words, John), have opinions to enforce, or objects to attain, and who will bring all the pressure they can to bear upon the Minister in furtherance of their views? In such cases, it will not be for the Minister, but for the Ministry, to decide in what manner the assault is to be met. The necessities of party, not the merits of the question, will shape their course of action. It may be Manchester to-day-it may be Exeter Hall to-morrow. Any powerful section of the House, representing some particular interest, may, by uniting itself with the standing Opposition, upset even a strong Governinent. But, in the present state of public opinion, a strong Government is an unattainable blessing. If the country is not now governed by concessions, I fear that it cannot be governed at all. Now, John, I exhort you, with my dying breath, to beware of Parliamentary interference. I have told you already that, in what you have been wont to call the "absence of direct responsibility" to Parliament, there were peculiar advantages under the old, now expiring, system of Indian government. In my time, John, the Indian Minister, under the name of President of the Board of Control, was as directly responsible to Parliament for everything done, and everything left undone, as, under the new order of things, will be your Secretary of State for India. But the business of administration was carried on in my name, and you were wont to regard it as my concern. If you understood the responsibility of the Minister, you were rarely or never inclined to exact it. If things went wrong, I was always to blame. And as I was never a political character, Parliament was content to know little, and to care less, about my doings. But the work of Indian government is now to be carried on in the name of the Secretary of State. Not only the "secret" business, but the common work of administration, is to proceed ostensibly under his hand. His actual responsibility for, or rather his real personal identification with, this or that measure, may be no greater, John, than it was when I ruled in Leadenhall Street. The measure may be shaped by the Council of India as entirely as by the Court of Directors. But it will be outwardly stamped with the Secretary's name, and will be his, therefore, in the eyes of the public. The process will differ but little under the new system, from that which has so long endured under the old. But, though the change may be little behind the scenes, on the stage there will be a mighty difference. Ministerial responsibility will exist, not merely as a constitutional theory, but practically as a living fact. It will be exacted, John. Instead of a growl at John Company, there will be an organised attack upon the Government of the day. Not merely the Secretary of State, but the entire Ministry of which he is a member, will be held responsible for all that goes wrong, or all that is supposed to go wrong, or all that, for party purposes, any one may declare to be going wrong. It ought to be an immense support to him to be able to stand up in his place and say, "I have acted in accordance with the opinions of a Council composed of fifteen experienced men possessing more knowledge of India than both Houses of Parliament." But will Party admit the plea? Will Party ever listen to reason? The Council in such a case will be ignored. However substantial its reality, it will be held to be a mere sham. The inefficiency of the Ministry is the point to be established. Every effort of the Opposition will be directed to that point; and Government must either fight it out, or submit to an ignoble concession. And which is the likelier course of the two? I am afraid, John, the latter. In the greater number of cases, when the Minister sees danger ahead, he will not appeal to the wisdom and experience of his Council, and declare that he is strong in their support; it will be an easier, and, for the nonce, a safer course, to fling his Council overboard, and say, "I had the advice of fifteen practical men. It was natural that I should value that advice. But, perhaps, I accepted it too hastily. I am willing to reconsider the matter in deference to the opinions of the House." I am afraid, John, it is too probable that we shall often hear explanations of this kind. Such explanations will often be forced upon the Indian Secretary by his colleagues. In the old times the President of the Board of Control was, perhaps, less a component part of the Ministry than any other member of the Cabinet. He went about his business very independently; and his colleagues concerned themselves little about his doings, because Indian affairs rarely came before Parliament, and were, I might almost say, never subjects of party debate. But this sort of independence of his colleagues will never again be a characteristic of an Indian Minister. Henceforth if, in the face of threatened opposition, he should. talk about adhering to his opinions, and maintaining his policy, because he believes it to be right, there will be such an outcry from his alarmed colleagues as must stagger his resolution. "Consider our position, think of our places! You surely would not sacrifice us all." Every man has not |