« ПредишнаНапред »
AM inclined to think, that both the writers of books
and the readers of them are generally not a little unreasonable in their expectations. The first seem to fancy that the world must approve whatever they produce, and the latter to imagine that authors are obliged to please them at any rate. Methinks, as on the one hand, no single man is born with a right of controuling the opinions of all the rest; so on the other, the world has no title to demand, that the whole care and time of any particular person should be facrificed to its entertainment. Therefore I cannot but believe that writers and readers are under equal obligations, for as much fame, or pleasure, as each affords the other.
Every one acknowledges, it would be a wild notion to expect perfection in any work of man: and yet one would think the contrary was taken for granted, by the judgment commonly past upon Poems. A Critic suppofes he has done his part, if he proves a writer to have failed in an expression, or erred in any particular point: and can it then be wondered at, if the Poets in general feem resolved not to own themselves in any error? For as long as one side will make no allowances, the other will be brought to no acknowledgments a.
I am afraid this extreme zeal on both sides is illplaced ; Poetry and Criticism being by no means the universal concern of the world, but only the affair of
a In the former editions it was thus -- For as long as one side despises a well-meant endeavour, the other will not be satisfied with a moderate approbation. But the Author altered it, as these words were rather a consequence from the conclusion he would draw, than the conclusion itself, which he has now insertedo
idle men who write in their closets, and of idle men who read there. Yet sure the whole, a bad Author deserves bet
upon ter usage than a bad Critic : for a Writer's endeavour, for the most part, is to please his Readers, and he fails merely through the misfortune of an ill judgment; but such a Critic's is to put them out of humour ; a design he could never go upon without both that and an ill temper.
I think a good deal may be said to extenuate the fault of bad Poets. What we call a Genius, is hard to be distinguished by a man himself, from a strong inclination: and if his genius be ever so great, he cannot at first discover it any other way, than by giving way to that prevalent propensity which renders him the more liable to be mistaken. The only method he has, is to make the experiment by writing, and appealing to the judgment of others : now if he happens to write ill (which is certainly no fin in itself) he is immediately made an object of ridicule. I wish we had the humanity to reflect, that even the worst authors might, in their endeavour to please us, deserve something at our hands. We have no cause to quarrel with them but for their obftinacy in perfitting to write; and this too may admit of alleviating circumstances. Their particular friends may be either ignorant, or insincere ; and the rest of the world in general is too well-bred to shock them with a truth, which generally their Booksellers are the firit that inform them of. This happens not till they have fpent too much of their time, to apply to any profeffios which might better fit their talents; and till such ta. lents as they have are so far discredited as to be but of small service to them. For (what is the hardest case imaginable) the reputation of a man generally dependa upon the first steps he makes in the world ;
will establish their opinion of us, from what we do at that feason, when we have least judgment to direct us.
On the other hand, a good Poet no sooner communicates his works with the same desire of information, but it is imagined he isa vain young creature given up to the ambition of fame; when perhaps the poor
man is all the while trembling with the fear of being ridicuJous. If he is made to hope he may please the world, he falls under very unlucky circumitances : for, from the moment he prints, he must expect to hear no more truth, than if he were a Prince, or a Beauty. If he has not very good sense (and indeed there are twenty men of wit for one man of sense) his living thus in a course of Aattery may put him in no small danger of becoming a Coxcomb: if he has, he will confequently have to much diffidence as not to reap any great fatisfadion from his praise ; since, if it be given to his face, it can scarce be distinguished from flattery, and if in his abfence, it is hard to be certain of it. Were he sure to be commended by the best and most knowing, he is as fure of being envied by the worst and most ignorant, which are the majority; for it is with a fine Genius, as with a fine fashion, all those are displeased at it who are not able to follow it: and it is to be feared that esteem will seldom do any man so much good, as ill-will does him harm. Then there is a third class of people who make the largest part of mankind, those of ordi. nary or indifferent capacities; and these (to a man) will hate, or fufpect him: a hundred honest Gentle men will dread him as a Wit, and a hundred innocent women as a Satiriit. In a word, whatever be his fata in Poetry, it is ten to one but he must give up all the reasonable aims of life for it. There are indeed some advantages. accruing from a Genius to Poetry, and they are all I can think of; the ag:eeable power of self
amusement when a man is idle or alone; the privilege of being admitted into the best company; and the freedom of saying as many careless things as other people, without being so severely remarked upon.
I believe, if any one, early in his life, should contemplate the dangerous fate of authors, he would scarce be of their number on any consideration. The life of a Wit is a warfare upon earth ; and the present fpirit of the learned world is such, that to attempt to serve it (any way) one must have the constancy of a martyr, and a resolution to suffer for its fake. I could wish people would believe, what I am pretty certain they will not, that I have been much less concerned about Fame than I durit declare till this occasion, when methinks I should find more credit than I could heretofore, fince my writings have had their fare already, and it is too late to think of prepoffesling the reader in their fa.
I would plead it as some merit in me, that the world has never been prepared for these Trifles by Prefaces, biaffed by recommendations, dazzled with the names of great Patrons, wheedled with fine reasons and pretences, or troubled with excuses. I confefs it was want of confideration that made me an author; I writ because it amused me; I corrected because it was as pleasant to me to correct as to write; and I published because I was told I might please such as it was a cre. dit to please. To what degree I have done this I am really ignorant; I had too much fondness for my productions to judge of them at first, and too much judgment to be pleased with them at last. But I have reafon to think they can have no reputation which will continue long, or which deserves to do so: for they have always fallen short not only of what I read of others, but even of my own ideas of Poetry.