Toleration, Diversity, and Global JusticePenn State Press, 5.11.2015 г. - 248 страници The "comprehensive liberalism" defended in this book offers an alternative to the narrower "political liberalism" associated with the writings of John Rawls. By arguing against making tolerance as fundamental a value as individual autonomy, and extending the reach of liberalism to global society, it opens the way for dealing more adequately with problems of human rights and economic inequality in a world of cultural pluralism. |
Между кориците на книгата
Резултати 1 - 5 от 66.
Страница
... liberal theoretical framework. Specifically, it considers how two common ... nonliberal ways of ordering political society? And can a liberal global ... liberalism and comprehensive liberalism offer different responses to these questions ...
... liberal theoretical framework. Specifically, it considers how two common ... nonliberal ways of ordering political society? And can a liberal global ... liberalism and comprehensive liberalism offer different responses to these questions ...
Страница
... liberals disagree heatedly among themselves over how these should be resolved. For example, what is the limit of liberal toleration? Should liberal global institutions and liberal states tolerate nonliberal states? Or should these be ...
... liberals disagree heatedly among themselves over how these should be resolved. For example, what is the limit of liberal toleration? Should liberal global institutions and liberal states tolerate nonliberal states? Or should these be ...
Страница
... society. But a unique sense in which political liberalism is political, one not shared by comprehensive liberalism, concerns the justification and, consequently, the scope of liberal politics. For the political liberal, liberalism is ...
... society. But a unique sense in which political liberalism is political, one not shared by comprehensive liberalism, concerns the justification and, consequently, the scope of liberal politics. For the political liberal, liberalism is ...
Страница
... not a decisive, test of the tenability of any interpretation of liberalism. Moreover, in moving the debate away from the domestic context, the flaws and virtues of each of these liberal ... associations within a country, and that the “ ...
... not a decisive, test of the tenability of any interpretation of liberalism. Moreover, in moving the debate away from the domestic context, the flaws and virtues of each of these liberal ... associations within a country, and that the “ ...
Страница
Kok-Chor Tan. My thesis is that comprehensive liberalism provides an interpretation of liberal ... not affect substantively our basic debate over whether liberalism ... societies. In contemporary philosophical debate, the position known as ...
Kok-Chor Tan. My thesis is that comprehensive liberalism provides an interpretation of liberal ... not affect substantively our basic debate over whether liberalism ... societies. In contemporary philosophical debate, the position known as ...
Съдържание
Individual Rights and State Sovereignty | |
The Rights of Peoples | |
The Problem of Oppressive Cultures | |
Justice and Equality | |
From Theory to Practice | |
Notes | |
Bibliography | |
Index | |
Други издания - Преглед на всички
Често срещани думи и фрази
accept application argue argument associations autonomy basic belief calls challenge Chapter choice citizens claims collective rights commitment communitarian comprehensive liberalism comprehensive views conception concern context countries criticisms cultural defend demands democratic developed DHSs discussion distinction distributive diversity doctrines domestic duties economic effects egalitarian endorse ends equal ethical example expression fact forced freedom fundamental give given global global theory governments groups hence hold human rights idea ideal identity important individual rights inequality institutions interests issue justice justified Kymlicka less liberty limits matter mean minority moral nonliberal objection oppressive particular persons philosophical policies political liberalism position possible practices present principle problem protect puts question Rawls Rawls’s reason regard reject requires respect response restrictions sense social societies sovereignty specific theory toleration tradition treat United universal values violate