Toleration, Diversity, and Global JusticePenn State Press, 5.11.2015 г. - 248 страници The "comprehensive liberalism" defended in this book offers an alternative to the narrower "political liberalism" associated with the writings of John Rawls. By arguing against making tolerance as fundamental a value as individual autonomy, and extending the reach of liberalism to global society, it opens the way for dealing more adequately with problems of human rights and economic inequality in a world of cultural pluralism. |
Между кориците на книгата
Резултати 1 - 5 от 56.
Страница
... domestic equivalent of the above global questions to gain some purchase on the philosophical issues under contention here. 4 Consider first the toleration question. Liberalism prides itself on its tolerance of different social (e.g. ...
... domestic equivalent of the above global questions to gain some purchase on the philosophical issues under contention here. 4 Consider first the toleration question. Liberalism prides itself on its tolerance of different social (e.g. ...
Страница
... domestic context, to the global context. I believe that this debate will serve as a useful prism through which to clarify the global questions I identified above. The discussion in this work will thus shift between domestic liberal ...
... domestic context, to the global context. I believe that this debate will serve as a useful prism through which to clarify the global questions I identified above. The discussion in this work will thus shift between domestic liberal ...
Страница
... domestic context, the flaws and virtues of each of these liberal interpretations previously obscured (though not necessarily resolved) by domestic contingencies can be better exposed. This is because the global context accentuates ...
... domestic context, the flaws and virtues of each of these liberal interpretations previously obscured (though not necessarily resolved) by domestic contingencies can be better exposed. This is because the global context accentuates ...
Страница
... domestic context, it was easily extended to the international sphere. Walzer himself, for instance, has presented a communitarian defence of state sovereignty against liberal defenders of individual rights like Charles Beitz.25 Another ...
... domestic context, it was easily extended to the international sphere. Walzer himself, for instance, has presented a communitarian defence of state sovereignty against liberal defenders of individual rights like Charles Beitz.25 Another ...
Страница
... domestic context, liberals should be concerned with collectivities like nations and even states if it is the case that one's nationality and citizenship give worth and meaning to one's goals and ends. In this case, a universal concern ...
... domestic context, liberals should be concerned with collectivities like nations and even states if it is the case that one's nationality and citizenship give worth and meaning to one's goals and ends. In this case, a universal concern ...
Съдържание
Individual Rights and State Sovereignty | |
The Rights of Peoples | |
The Problem of Oppressive Cultures | |
Justice and Equality | |
From Theory to Practice | |
Notes | |
Bibliography | |
Index | |
Други издания - Преглед на всички
Често срещани думи и фрази
accept application argue argument associations autonomy basic belief calls challenge Chapter choice citizens claims collective rights commitment communitarian comprehensive liberalism comprehensive views conception concern context countries criticisms cultural defend demands democratic developed DHSs discussion distinction distributive diversity doctrines domestic duties economic effects egalitarian endorse ends equal ethical example expression fact forced freedom fundamental give given global global theory governments groups hence hold human rights idea ideal identity important individual rights inequality institutions interests issue justice justified Kymlicka less liberty limits matter mean minority moral nonliberal objection oppressive particular persons philosophical policies political liberalism position possible practices present principle problem protect puts question Rawls Rawls’s reason regard reject requires respect response restrictions sense social societies sovereignty specific theory toleration tradition treat United universal values violate