Toleration, Diversity, and Global JusticePenn State Press, 5.11.2015 г. - 248 страници The "comprehensive liberalism" defended in this book offers an alternative to the narrower "political liberalism" associated with the writings of John Rawls. By arguing against making tolerance as fundamental a value as individual autonomy, and extending the reach of liberalism to global society, it opens the way for dealing more adequately with problems of human rights and economic inequality in a world of cultural pluralism. |
Между кориците на книгата
Резултати 1 - 5 от 86.
Страница
... arguments in these chapters. While references are made here occasionally to the political versus comprehensive liberal dispute (unavoidable given the underlying theme of this book), these references can be put to one side without ...
... arguments in these chapters. While references are made here occasionally to the political versus comprehensive liberal dispute (unavoidable given the underlying theme of this book), these references can be put to one side without ...
Страница
... argument is the recommendation that, foremost, state actors protect and promote their national interests), but even as a descriptive view, it is far from “realistic.” With the advent of the various international and regional ...
... argument is the recommendation that, foremost, state actors protect and promote their national interests), but even as a descriptive view, it is far from “realistic.” With the advent of the various international and regional ...
Страница
... arguments available to the political liberal in justifying liberalism in the public domain, namely, those that do not appeal to any comprehensive philosophical or moral doctrines, constrain the scope of political liberalism by exempting ...
... arguments available to the political liberal in justifying liberalism in the public domain, namely, those that do not appeal to any comprehensive philosophical or moral doctrines, constrain the scope of political liberalism by exempting ...
Страница
... arguments that may obscure the discussion to come. Communitarians do not constitute a monolithic group hostile to ... argue that liberalism ignores the important relationship between individuals and their community, that individual well ...
... arguments that may obscure the discussion to come. Communitarians do not constitute a monolithic group hostile to ... argue that liberalism ignores the important relationship between individuals and their community, that individual well ...
Страница
... argue that they do not, and need not, deny the basic communitarian premise that our ends and goods are defined by, and derive their worth from, the practices and traditions of our community; on the contrary, they take this basic fact ...
... argue that they do not, and need not, deny the basic communitarian premise that our ends and goods are defined by, and derive their worth from, the practices and traditions of our community; on the contrary, they take this basic fact ...
Съдържание
Individual Rights and State Sovereignty | |
The Rights of Peoples | |
The Problem of Oppressive Cultures | |
Justice and Equality | |
From Theory to Practice | |
Notes | |
Bibliography | |
Index | |
Други издания - Преглед на всички
Често срещани думи и фрази
accept application argue argument associations autonomy basic belief calls challenge Chapter choice citizens claims collective rights commitment communitarian comprehensive liberalism comprehensive views conception concern context countries criticisms cultural defend demands democratic developed DHSs discussion distinction distributive diversity doctrines domestic duties economic effects egalitarian endorse ends equal ethical example expression fact forced freedom fundamental give given global global theory governments groups hence hold human rights idea ideal identity important individual rights inequality institutions interests issue justice justified Kymlicka less liberty limits matter mean minority moral nonliberal objection oppressive particular persons philosophical policies political liberalism position possible practices present principle problem protect puts question Rawls Rawls’s reason regard reject requires respect response restrictions sense social societies sovereignty specific theory toleration tradition treat United universal values violate