Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub

NUMBER II.

Lucretius

Doctrina solers idem, clarusque Poeta,

Antiqui vatis reparat solennia jura.

Huic, simul ac rerum Primordia pandere tentat,
Naturamque Deûm, flammantia mænia mundi
Extra et procedit, Musarum captus amore,
Ipsa Venus, votis blanda, arridere videtur,
Nympharumque Chorus; tantus lepor insinuat se
Verbis, tanta viri est celebris vis insita menti.

Dyer.

As a considerable portion of the poem De Rerum Natura is occupied in the detail of argument, and the display of various and contending doctrines, it may be deemed necessary to adduce a specimen or two of the pure didactic style and manner of Lucretius, and of the success which has attended his Translator in this, perhaps his most difficult and laborious,

department.* Independent of perspicuity of. arrangement and harmony of verse, Lucretius has rendered the most abstruse passages in his work pleasing from the peculiar propriety of his expression, and the beauty of his metaphors; these excellencies have, in my opinion, been transferred with singular felicity to the english version, and the extracts I have now to bring forward, will probably induce the reader to concur in the encomium.

Some philosophers of the present day have, with no little extravagance, inferred the perfectibility of human nature; they have even gone so far as to assert that the physical conse'quences of our existence, sleep and death, are no necessary result, but the effects of our own ignorance, and of acquired imbecillity; that as reason and knowledge advance, the agency of volition will be unlimited, and that ultimately the corporeal functions will be rendered completely subservient to the powers of intellect.

The Monthly Reviewer, to whom I am indebted for an elaborate and candid critique on the first edition of the Literary Hours, being of opinion that a specimen of the translation should have been drawn from the more abstruse parts of Lucretius, I have in this paper carried his suggestion into execution.

Lucretius has wisely rejected this day-dream of philosophy, for, though he appear to believe that man may by his own efforts approach toward perfection, and emulate the gods in happiness, yet he has taken care to qualify this opinion by affirming that the seeds of vice and imperfection cannot be altogether eradicated; that man, in fact, cannot shake off the imbecillities incident to materiality, nor can he annihilate those passions which the deity has, for wise purposes, attached to our system.

Sic Hominum genus est: quamvis Doctrina politos
Constituat pariter quosdam, tamen illa relinquit
Naturæ cujusque Animæ vestigia prima.
Nec radicitùs evelli mala posse putandum 'st,
Quin proclivius Hic iras decurrat ad acreis;
Ille metu citiùs paullo tentetur: at Ille
Tertius accipiat quædam clementiùs æquo.
Inque aliis rebus multis differre necesse 'st
Naturas hominum varias, moresque sequaceis :
Quorum ego nunc nequeo cæcas exponere causas,
Nec reperire figurarum tot nomina, quot sunt
Principiis, unde hæc oritur variantia rerum.,
Illud in his rebus videor firmare potesse,
Usque adeo Naturarum vestigia linqui
Parvola, quæ nequeat Ratio depellere dictis :
Ut nihil impediat dignam Diis degere vitam.

Lib. iii. 308.

Thus varies man: tho' education oft

Add its bland polish, frequent still we trace
The first deep print of nature on the soul,
Nor aught can all-erase it. Hence, thro' time,
This yields to sudden rage, to terror that,
While oft a third beyond all right betrays
A heart of mercy. Thus in various modes,
The moral temper, and symphoneous life
Must differ; thus from many a cause occult
The sage can ne'er resolve, nor human speech
Find phrase to explain; so boundless, so complex
The primal sources whence the variance flows!
Yet this the Muse may dictate, that so few
The native traces wisdom ne'er can rase
Man still may emulate the gods in bliss.

The doctrine of Pyrrho which inculcates perfect scepticism, and discredits even the testimony of the senses, Lucretius held in utter and deserved contempt, and in the following passage he has in a striking manner laid open the absurdity of his tenets. It is a lesson still applicable at the commencement of the nineteenth century, and may with equal propriety be addressed to the disciples of Berkley and of Hume, for he who denies the existence of matter, must in almost every instance disbelieve the evidence of sense.

Denique, nil sciri siquis putat, id quoque nescit,
An sciri possit, quoniam nihil scire fatetur:
Hunc igitur contra mittam contendere causam,
Qui capite ipse suo in statuit vestigia sese.

Et tamen hoc quoque uti concedam, scire, at id

ipsum

Quæram, quom in rebus veri nil viderit ante,
Unde sciat, quid sit scire, et nescire vicissim :
Notitiam veri quæ res, falsique creârit;
Et dubium certo quæ res differre probârit?
Invenies primis ab sensibus esse creatam
Notitiam veri, neque sensus posse refelli:
Nam majore fide debet reperirier illud,
Sponte sua veris quod possit vincere falsa.
Quid majore fide porro, quam sensus haberi
Debet? An ab sensu falso ratio orta valebit
Dicere eos contra, quæ tota ab sensibus orta 'st?
Qui nisi sint veri, ratio quoque falsa fit omnis,
An poterunt oculos aures reprehendere? an aureis
Tactus? an hunc porro tactum sapor arguet oris ?
An confutabunt nares, oculive revincent?

Non (ut opinor) ita 'st: Nam seorsum quoique po

testas

Divisa 'st: sua vis quoique 'st: ideoque necesse 'st,
Et, quod molle sit, et gelidum, fervensque videri;
Et seorusm varios rerum sentire colores,
Et quæcunque coloribu' sunt conjuncta, necesse 'st.
Seorsus item sapor oris habet vim, seorsus odores
Nascuntur, seorsum sonitus: ideoque necesse 'st,

« ПредишнаНапред »