makes us feared, it alfo makes us proportionably hated, by our inferiors and dependants. Let the influence it gives us be ever fo great, that man must pay very dear for his power, who procures it at the expence of his own tranquillity and peace. BESIDES, the imitation of anger, which is eafily formed, will produce the fame effect upon others, as if the paffion was real. If therefore to quicken the flow, to roufe the inattentive, and reftrain the fierce, it is fometimes expedient, that they believe you are moved, you may put on the outward appearance of refentment. Thus you may obtain the end of anger, without that danger and vexation that attend it; and preferve your authority, without forfeiting the peace of your mind. HOWEVER manly and vigorous anger may be thought, it is in fact, but a weak principle, compared with the fedate refolution of a wife and virtuous man. The one is uniform and permanent, like the ftrength of a perfon in perfect health; the other like a force, which proceedeth from a fever, is violent for a time, but it foon leaves the mind more feeble than before. To him therefore who is armed with a proper firmness of foul, no degree of paffion can be useful in any refpect. And to fay it can ever be laudable and virtuous, is indeed a fufficiently bold affertion. For the most part we blame it in others, and though we are apt to be indulgent enough to our own faults, we are often afhamed of it in ourselves. Hence it is com. mon to hear men excufing themselves, and seriously declaring, they were not angry, when they have given unquestionable proofs to the contrary. But do we not commend him, who refents the injuries done to a friend or innocent perfon? Yes, we commend him; Yet not for his paffion, but for that generofity and friendship, of which it is the evidence. For let any -one impartially confider, which of these characters he esteems the better; his, who interefts himfelf in the injuries of his friend, and zealously defends him with perfect calmnefs and ferenity of temper; or his, who purfues the fame conduct under the influence of refentment. Ir anger then is neither useful nor commendable, it is certainly the part of wisdom, to fupprefs it entirely. We should rather confine it, you tell us, within certain bounds. But how fhall we afccrtain the limits, to which it may, and beyond which it ought not to pass! When we receive a manifeft injury, it feems we may refent it, provided we do it with moderation, M ration. When we fuffer a worfe abufe, our anger, I fuppofe, may rife fomewhat higher. Now, as the degrees of juftice are infinite, if our anger must always be proportioned to the occafion, it may poffibly proceed to the utmost extravagance. Shall we fet bounds to our refentment, while we are yet calm ? how can we be affured, that being once yet loose, it will not carry us beyond them; or fhall we give paffion the reins, imagining we can refume them at pleasure, or trufting it will tire or ftop itself, as foon as it has run to its proper length; as well might we think of giving laws to a tempeft; as well might we endeavour to run mad by rule and method. In reality, it is much easier to keep ourselves void of resentment, than to reftrain it from excefs, when it has gained admiffion; for if reason, while her strength is yet entire, is not able to preserve her dominion, what can she do when her enemy has in part prevailed and weakened her force? To ufe the illuftration of an excellent author, we can prevent the beginnings of fome things, whofe progress afterwards we cannot hinder. We can fear to caft ourselves down from a precipice, but if once we have taken the fatal leap, we must descend, whether we will or no. Thus the mind, if duly cautious, may ftand firm upon the rock of tranquillity; but if the rafhly forfakes the fummit, the can scarce recover herself, but is hurried away downwards by her own paffion, with increasing violence. Do not fay, that we exhort you to attempt that which is impoffible. Nature has put it in our power to refift the motions of anger. We only plead inability, when we want an excufe for our own negligence. Was a paffionate man to forfeit a hundred pounds as often as he was angry, or was he fure he must die the next moment after the first fally of his paffion, we fhould find, he had a great command of his temper whenever he could prevail upon himself to exercife a proper attention about it. And fhall we not efteem it worthy of equal attention; worthy of our utmost care and pains to obtain that immoveable tranquillity of mind, without which we cannot relish, either life itself, or any one of its employments ?-Upon the whole then, we both may and ought, not merely to refrain, but extirpate anger. It is impatient of rule; in proportion as it prevails, it will difquiet our minds; it has nothing commendable in itfelf, nor will it answer any valuable purpofe in life. THE ACTOR *. ADDRESSED ΤΟ RONNEL THOR NTON. Esq. A CTING, dear Thornton, its perfection draws From no obfervance of mechanic laws: No fettled maxims of a fav'rite ftage, If 'mongst the humble hearers of the pit, In the fweet fenfe of fympathetic woe; Through ev'ry vein I feel a chillness creep. And at the old man's look and frantic ftare 'Tis Lear alarms me, for I fee him there. Nor yet confin'd to tragic walks alone, The comic mufe too claims thee for her own. By Robert Lloyd, M.A. Perfection's Perfection's top, with weary toil and pain, Once on the ftage, in Rome's declining days, And men still wag'd an impious war with God, An actor flourish'd of no vulgar fame. A noble object for his skill he chofe, A martyr dying 'midft infulting foes; Yet braving monarchs in his Saviour's caufe.. He felt a zeal beyond the reach of art, A kindred ardour in the player's breaft, The player's province they but vainly try. Theatric monarchs, in their tragic gait. Unkilful actors, like your mimic apes, However However foreign to the poet's art, While a whole minute equipois'd he stands, When Romeo forrowing at his Juliet's doom, To paint the paffion's force, and mark it well, What was writ down, with decent utt'rance spoke, The word and action should conjointly fuit, |