Freedom of the Press: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of ... 92-1 & 2, September 28-February 17, 1972
1972 - 1332 страници
Какво казват хората - Напишете рецензия
Не намерихме рецензии на обичайните места.
action advertising agree Amendment American answer appear apply asked Association BASKIR believe bill broadcast called Chairman Commission committee communications concern confidential Congress constitutional course criticism decision disclosure discussion editor effect established example expression fact fairness doctrine Federal force free press freedom freedom of speech gather give Government groups hearings ideas important interest involved issue journalists jury Justice kind legislation license limited major matter means ment newsmen newspapers officials opinion person political position present President privilege problem protection published question radio reason recent regulation reporter responsibility restraint result rule Senator Ervin serve situation society sources statement stations story subcommittee subpoena Supreme Court television testimony Thank things tion truth United witness York
Страница 477 - I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
Страница 680 - These later decisions have fashioned the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.* As we said in Noto v.
Страница 711 - In each case [courts] must ask whether the gravity of the 'evil,' discounted by its improbability, justifies such invasion of free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger.
Страница 359 - It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.
Страница 363 - It is the purpose of this Act, among other things, to maintain the control of the United States over all the channels of interstate and foreign radio transmission; and to provide for the use of such channels, but not the ownership thereof, by persons for limited periods of time, under licenses granted by Federal authority, and no such license shall be construed to create any right, beyond the terms, conditions, and periods of the license.
Страница 194 - That the printing Presses shall be free to every person who undertakes to examine the proceedings of the legislature, or any branch of government : And no law shall ever be made to restrain the right thereof. The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of the invaluable rights of man ; and every citizen may freely speak, write and print on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty.
Страница 359 - Because of the scarcity of radio frequencies, the Government is permitted to put restraints on licensees in favor of others whose views should be expressed on this unique medium. But the people as a whole retain their interest in free speech by radio and their collective right to have the medium function consistently with the ends and purposes of the First Amendment. It is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters, which is paramount.
Страница 39 - The liberty of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state ; but this consists in laying no previous restraints upon publications, and not in freedom from censure for criminal matter, when published. Every freeman has an undoubted right to lay what sentiments he pleases before the public ; to forbid this is to destroy the freedom of the press ; but if he publishes what is improper, mischievous, or illegal, he must take the consequence of his own temerity.
Страница 39 - The basis of our government being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.