Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub

declining before vaccination,
86; letters from Brown of
Musselburgh, 288; smallpox
and vaccination in Ceylon,
393; estimate for National
Vaccine Establishment, 461;
scepticism as to vaccination,
477; cited by Jacob Bright
against Marson on marks, 561.
Grey, Mr., Jenner's reward, 195.
Griffiths, John, 189.

Grosvenor, Robert, vaccinated by
Jenner, 1801, has smallpox,
1811, 318-321.

Gull, Dr. Wm., asserts vaccination
as protective as smallpox, 355,
564; evidence House of Com-
mons'committee, 1871, 564-565.
Guy, Dr. W. A., vaccination a
question of figures, 596.
Guy's Hospital, 1802, 275.

[blocks in formation]

Haughton, Dr. Edward, 590.
Hawes, Dr., 218.
Haygarth, Dr., 57, 83, 569; vario-

lation in Geneva, 61; Chester
smallpox, 69; transmits vac-
cine virus to Boston, 376-377.
Haynes, William, smallpox and
horsegrease, 117.

Heaths of Hertford variolated by
Maitland, 19-20.
Heberden, Dr. William, successful
variolator, 140.
Hecquet, Dr., 35.

Henley, J. W., homely sense and

sympathy with poor, 498, 499,
531, 535, 536; Lord R. Mon-
tagu's nonsense, 539.

Herpes, interference with vaccina-
tion, 340-343, 356.
Hertford, 19, 20, 23, 48.
Hervey, Dr. James, 459.
Hicks, Henry, 102, 134.
Hicks, Dr., letter to Jenner on cow-
pox from horsegrease, 133.
Highlands of Scotland, variolation
practised, 29.

Highmore, Anthony, tribute to
Woodville, 163.

Hignells vaccinated by Jenner,

variolated by Freeman, 280.
Hill, Rev. Rowland, thundered for
vaccination, 290; controversy
with Moseley, 293-296.
Hjaltalin, Dr., Iceland, 422.
Hobbes, 583.

Holland, variolation in, 62.
Holland, Lord, letter to Jenner
from Madrid, 400.

Holland, Sir Henry, failure of vac-
cination, 490.

Holstein, cowpox believed good
against smallpox, 94.

Home, Sir Everard, 193, 459.
Hooper's Lexicon Medicum, 271.
Hopwood, C. H., 577.
Horsegrease, Jenner shows his

nephew a horse with diseased
heels, saying, "There is the
source of smallpox," 97, 359,
513; belief of farriers and farm-
ers that cowpox originated in
horsegrease, 100, 110, 111, 154,
179; originates on thigh of colt
with erysipelas, 112; action
indistinguishable from cow-
pox, 157; futile inoculations
of cows by Dr. Woodville and
others, 145, 259; Jenner's ac-
count of his faith, 154; Pear-
son sets aside Jenner's doc-
trine, 153, 158, 178, 472, 512;
considered horsegrease "like
to damn the whole thing," 158,
260, 336, 375; Jenner dropped
horsegrease, 180; and why,
178, 260, 368, 375; dropped
and resumed, 512; not a word
about horsegrease in New Eng-
land, 375; repudiated by Dr.

Mason Good, 263; used suc-
cessfully by Thomas Tanner
and Loy, 263; Sacco, 264, 405;
and De Carro, 265, 405; La
Font, 265; Melon, 267: Baron,
269;
and by Jenner, 267-268,
271, who uses and distributes
the equine virus, 268, 347; ex-
planation of mystification, 270-
272,
Horsegrease Cowpox, Jenner's

happy thought and original
prescription, 114, 201, 334,
347, 472; the note of Inquiry,
125,202: Marson's opinion, 562.
Horsepox, 472, 568; Prof. Bouley's
experiments, 273; cases de-
scribed by Mr. Langton, 273;
probable resort to, 273.
Hosty, Dr., report on variolation
in London, 59.

Houlton, Rev. Robert, engaged to

puff Suttons, 46.

House of Commons' committee on
Jenner's petition, 186-193; re-
port, 194; vote, £10,000,
1802, 196; vote, £20,000,
1807, 243-249; committee,
1871, 552-573.

Howgrave, Francis, opposes vario-
lation, 31.

Hufeland, tartar emetic for vac-

cine virus, 121, 348.
Hume, Joseph, exposure of malver-

sation of public money by Na-
tional Vaccine Establishment,
460.
Hume-Rothery, Mrs., 548, 578.
Hume-Rothery. Wm., 548, 578;

evidence House of Commons'
committee, 1871, 556.
Hunter, John, "Don't think, but

try," 98; relations with Jen-
ner, 91-93, 348; heard of cow-
pox from Jenner, 136, 193;
two diseased actions in same
part cannot occur simultane-
ously, 164.
Hutchins's History of Dorset, 85.
Hutchinson, Jonathan, evidence

House of Commons' commit-
tee, 1871, 567-568.

Huxham, John, 521.
Hydrophobia, inoculation, 359,
371.

Iceland, smallpox and vaccination,
420-423; measles, 422.
India, vaccination introduced, 383-
393; variolators bribed, 386;
frauds practised, 387-388; sub-
scriptions for Jenner, 390;
Sir Richard Temple on vacci-
nation at this day, 391.
Indians vaccinated by Balmis,
402; fabulous stories of small-
pox, 402.
Ingatestone, Suttons' variolation
establishment, 45.

Ingenhousz, Dr., discovers Jen-
ner's mis-statements, 130-132,
140.

Inoculation. See Variolation.
Inquiry, Jenner's, publication, 102;

analysis, 103-127; pronounced
by Simon a masterpiece of me-
dical induction, 103, 333; its
essential doctrine, 335; printed
last time in 1801, 337; why
kept out of print, 344.
Inquiry, Pearson's, 136.
Ireland, variolation introduced,

34; practised after prohibi-
tion, 474; distress a cause of
smallpox, 472; fees for vac-
cination, 489; vaccination said
by Sir Dominic Corrigan in
1871 to have practically ex-
tinguished smallpox, 561.

Irish oppression, 593.

Italy, Sacco's vaccinations, 403-
404.

Itch prevents vaccination, 126, 277.

Jefferson, Thomas, letter to Jen-
ner, 380.
Jeffrey, Francis, 289; fury of
vaccination controversy, 290;
contrary to all analogy that
vaccination wears out, 302;
homicidal article in Edinburgh
Review, 364; declining faith
in vaccination, 365.
Jellyby, Mrs., 322.

Jenner, Edward, regimen prior to
variolation, 45; birth and edu-
cation, 91; relations with John
Hunter, 92-93; Sodbury legend,
93; a bore about cowpox, 95;
iniraculous prevision, 95;
Gardner's questionable remi-
niscences, 97, 122; horse with
greasy heels the origin of small-
pox, 97, 359; marriage in 1788,
97; a good hand at verses, 97;
purchase of degree from St.
Andrews, 98; inoculates son
with swinepox, 98; experi-
ments with cowpox, 98-99;
origin of cowpox in horsegrease
beyond denial, 100; difficulty
of proof, 100.

First vaccination, 1796, 101;
publishes Inquiry, 1798, 102;
describes cowpox, 109; tries in
vain to generate it from horse-
grease, 110-112; invents
spurious cowpox, 113; denies
virtue for cowpox and asserts
it for horsegrease cowpox, 114;
cases of horsegrease, 115; fancy
as to origin of smallpox, 120,
359, 513; absolute security
from smallpox after horse-
grease cowpox, 121; cowpox
as an expulsive irritant, 123;
single point of originality, 124;
visit to London, 1798, 127;
without cowpox, 129; advised
by Cline to settle in London,
129; difference with Ingen-
housz, 130-132; favourable
reception of Inquiry, 134;
Pearson claims association,
134; brickbats flying around,
135; cowpox always erysi-
pelatous, 143; uses cowpox
from London, 147; jealousy of
Pearson, 147; inquiries at a
stand, 148; visits London to
counteract Pearson and Wood-
ville, 148; anxious, fretful,
helpless, 151; Further Obser-
vations, 1799, 152; purpose and
poverty of pamphlet, 152;

differences with Pearson and
Woodville, 158; slovenly and
incomplete knowledge, 158;
Vaccine Pock Institution, 160-
161; Continuation of Facts and
Observations, 1800, 163; annex-
ation of Pearson and Wood-
ville's work, 163-164, 181;
re-asserts the abiding prophy-
laxy of cowpox, 166; tries to
undermine Vaccine Pock Insti-
tution, 167; reception by King
and Queen, 171; John Ring's
alliance, 172, 176; presented
with plate, 1801, 176; finds
honour windy fare, 177; deter-
mines to drop horsegrease,
178, 180; mode of transforma-
tion, 178; Origin of the Vaccine
Inoculation, 1801, 178; claims
discovery of cowpox, 179, and
discriminates true from
spurious, 180; artful explana-
tions, 182-183; application to
Lord Sherborne, 183; prepares
petition, 184-185, which is re-
ferred to committee of House
of Commons, 186; evidence
before committee, 186-194;
claim limited to conveyance
of cowpox from arm to arm,
193; voted £10,000 by House
of Commons, 196.

Jenner's case examined by
Pearson, 197-203; could he
have taken a patent? 207;
factitious glory, 215; delay in
payment of £10,000, 216; fate
as London physician, 216;
Royal Jennerian Society, 218-
219; head turned with adula-
tion, 221; uxorious habits,
222; quarrel with Walker,
225-226; wreck of Royal
Jennerian Society, 227; impe-
cuniosity, 228; shyness, 230;
"the cowpox doctor," 230;
plans for pecuniary relief, 231;
reference of Parliament to
Royal College of Physicians,
232-234; Jenner's evidence

and disownment of spurious
cowpox, 239 240; voted
£20,000, 243-248; director of
National Vaccine Establish-
ment, 255; withdraws and ex-
pects sensation, 256; sulking
at Berkeley, 257; tactics as to
horsegrease, 259, 262, 263;
what did he discover? 261;
swinepox, 262; reverts to
original position, 264, 267;
uses and diffuses horsepox,
268-269; a slovenly investi-
gator, 270, 272; Birch on
spurious cowpox, 277-278;
pestered with failures, 280-281;
Birch "a sad wicked fellow,"
283; treatment of Goldson,
285; claim to absence of fail-
ures, 287; friendship with Rev.
Rowland Hill, 294.

Miraculous quality of Jen-
ner's contempt, 301; split with
Walker, 307; vaccinates sons
of Sir Richard Phillips and
Philip Codd, who afterwards
had smallpox, 312-313; also of
Earl Grosvenor, 318-321; the
slush his followers had to march
through,315; dislike of Walker
and his Institution, 324; Ring
as bully and libeller, 324-330;
Jenner's later writings, 333-
348; why Inquiry was sup-
pressed, 333-337; mystery of
horsegrease, 334-336; experi-
ments with horsegrease on
cows, 335; spurious cowpox
dodge, 336; herpes and vacci-
nation, 340-342; elusion of
variolous test, 342; smallpox
flying in all directions, 344-
345; comparative London
mortalities, 346; successive
poxes for vaccination, 347-348,
525; final publication on Tar-
tar Emetic, 348; Baron's bio-
graphy, 349-363; meeting with
Baron, 349-350; treatment of
adversaries, 350 - 352, 474;
investigation resented, 352;

appropriation of work of
others, 352-353; denial that
influence of vaccination wore
out, 353; Lord Ellenborough,
353-354, 357; dying testimony
to vaccination, 354; contri-
vances to break his fall, 355-
356; variolation of son and
scandal, 357-358; insanitary
house and sickly family, 85,
318, 358-359, 448; belief that
human diseases originated in
animals, 97, 359; suggested
extension of vaccination, 359-
360; much adulation excused
self-deception,360; abhorrence
of London, 361; exclusion from
Royal College of Physicians,
361; presentation to Emperor
Alexander, 362; death of Mrs.
Jenner, 1815, 362; perplexities
toward close of life, 362; death,
1823, 362; funeral and me-
morials, 363; statue in London,
363; sends equine virus to
Edinburgh, 368, tactics as con-
cerned horsegrease, 375; sends
gold box to Dr. Waterhouse,
378; project and reward for
conveyance of virus to India,
383-384; vaccination in Madras
and Bombay, 388; tribute from
India, 390; Sweden and Ceylon,
392; medal from naval officers,
398; anecdote of Napoleon, 400.

Arithmetical incapacity,
415, 423; reason for vote of
£20,000, 453; denial of spurious
cowpox, 454; deceived as to
National Vaccine Establish-
ment, 454-456; insolence to-
ward Brown of Musselburgh,
457-458; his virus the stock
of National Vaccine Establish-
ment, 472-473; treatment of
opponents, 474; did not intro-
duce cowpox, 512; smallpox
from horse through cow, 513;
vaccinates King's staghounds,
515; ruthless, untruthful,
mercenary, 578.

JENNER'S

PUBLICATIONS ON VACCINATION AND SUCCESSIVE ASSURANCES.

An Inquiry into the Cause and Effects of the Variola Vaccina,
a Disease discovered in some of the Western Counties of Eng-
land, particularly Gloucestershire, and known by the name of
the Cow Pox. London: 1798.

1798. What renders the Cow Pox Virus so extremely singular is, that
the person who has been thus affected is for ever after secure from
the infection of the Small Pox; neither the exposure to the
variolous effluvia, nor the insertion of the matter into the skin,
producing this distemper.

It is curious to observe, that the virus, which with respect to it effects
is undetermined and uncertain previously to its passing from the
horse through the medium of the cow, should then not only become
more active, but should invariably and completely possess those
specific properties which induce in the human constitution symptoms
similar to those of the variolous fever, and effect in it that peculiar
change which for ever renders it unsusceptible of the variolous
contagion.

It clearly appears that this disease leaves the constitution in a state of
perfect security from the infection of the Small Pox.-Pp. 121, 337.

Further Observations on the Variola Vaccine. London: 1799.
1799. The result of all my trials with the virus on the human subject
has been uniform. In every instance the patient who has felt its
influence has completely lost the susceptibility for the variolous
contagion.-Pp. 152-158, 336.

A Continuation of Facts and Observations relative to the
Variola Vaccina, or Cow Pox. London: 1800.

1800. The scepticism that appeared even among the most enlightened
of medical men, when my sentiments on the important subject of
the Cow Pox were first promulgated, was highly laudable. To
have admitted the truth of a doctrine, at once so novel and so
unlike anything that had ever appeared in the Annals of Medicine,
without the test of the most rigid scrutiny, would have bordered
upon temerity; but now, when that scrutiny has taken place, not
only among ourselves, but in the first professional circles in Europe,
and when it has been uniformly found in such abundant instances,
that the human frame, when once it has felt the influence of the
genuine Cow Pox in the way that has been described, is never
afterwards, at any period of its existence, assailable by the Small
Pox, may I not with perfect confidence congratulate my country
and society at large on their beholding in the mild form of the Cow
Pox, an antidote that is capable of extirpating from the earth a
disease which is every hour devouring its victims; a disease that
has ever been considered as the severest scourge of the human
race.-Pp. 166, 338-339, 357, 365, 473.

« ПредишнаНапред »