Toleration, Diversity, and Global JusticePenn State Press, 5.11.2015 г. - 248 страници The "comprehensive liberalism" defended in this book offers an alternative to the narrower "political liberalism" associated with the writings of John Rawls. By arguing against making tolerance as fundamental a value as individual autonomy, and extending the reach of liberalism to global society, it opens the way for dealing more adequately with problems of human rights and economic inequality in a world of cultural pluralism. |
Между кориците на книгата
Резултати 1 - 5 от 15.
Страница 20
... Overlapping Consensus,'' in The Idea of Democracy, 248. 5. Rawls, Political Liberalism, 78. 6. Ibid., 195. 7. Rawls, 20 TOLERATION, DIVERSITY, AND GLOBAL JUSTICE.
... Overlapping Consensus,'' in The Idea of Democracy, 248. 5. Rawls, Political Liberalism, 78. 6. Ibid., 195. 7. Rawls, 20 TOLERATION, DIVERSITY, AND GLOBAL JUSTICE.
Страница 21
... overlapping consensus between most (including nonliberal) comprehensive views. When this overlapping consensus is in place, liberalism attains what Rawls calls a ''freestanding'' status; at this point it does not depend on any ...
... overlapping consensus between most (including nonliberal) comprehensive views. When this overlapping consensus is in place, liberalism attains what Rawls calls a ''freestanding'' status; at this point it does not depend on any ...
Страница 22
... overlapping consensus is more precisely then a consensus between reasonable comprehensive views; namely, views that are tolerant of other views and that do not violate the public political citizenship rights of their members (e.g., to ...
... overlapping consensus is more precisely then a consensus between reasonable comprehensive views; namely, views that are tolerant of other views and that do not violate the public political citizenship rights of their members (e.g., to ...
Страница 24
... overlapping consensus. A reasonable law of peoples is first conceived, and only then it is asked whether nonliberal regimes can also freely endorse this law. In this first step of the extension, Rawls has representatives. concern in ...
... overlapping consensus. A reasonable law of peoples is first conceived, and only then it is asked whether nonliberal regimes can also freely endorse this law. In this first step of the extension, Rawls has representatives. concern in ...
Страница 31
... overlapping consensus' is really just a modus vivendi among quite different models of society.'' Hoffmann, 54. Some critics have presented this charge against Rawls even in his domestic theory. But this charge is even more obvious ...
... overlapping consensus' is really just a modus vivendi among quite different models of society.'' Hoffmann, 54. Some critics have presented this charge against Rawls even in his domestic theory. But this charge is even more obvious ...
Съдържание
1 | |
19 | |
Two Liberal Views | 47 |
4 Individual Rights and State Sovereignty | 79 |
5 The Rights of Peoples | 103 |
6 The Problem of Oppressive Cultures | 129 |
7 Justice and Equality | 159 |
8 From Theory to Practice | 193 |
Bibliography | 219 |
Index | 229 |
Back Cover | 234 |
Други издания - Преглед на всички
Често срещани думи и фрази
able accept application argued argument associations autonomy basic belief calls challenge Chapter choice citizens claims collective rights commitment communitarian comprehensive liberalism conception concern context countries course criticisms cultural defend demands democratic developed DHSs discussion distinction distributive diversity doctrine domestic duties economic effects egalitarian endorse equal ethical example expression fact forced freedom fundamental give given global global theory governments granting ground groups hence hold human rights idea ideal identity important individual rights inequality institutions issue justice justify Kymlicka less liberty limits matter mean minority moral nonliberal objection oppressive particular persons philosophical policies political liberalism position possible practices present principle problem protect puts question Rawls Rawls’s reason regard reject requires respect response restrictions sense social society sovereignty specific theory tion toleration tradition treat United universal values violate