Toleration, Diversity, and Global Justice
Penn State Press, 19.12.2000 г. - 248 страници
The "comprehensive liberalism" defended in this book offers an alternative to the narrower "political liberalism" associated with the writings of John Rawls. By arguing against making tolerance as fundamental a value as individual autonomy, and extending the reach of liberalism to global society, it opens the way for dealing more adequately with problems of human rights and economic inequality in a world of cultural pluralism.
Резултати 1 - 5 от 5.
Urgent questions remain unanswered, and liberals disagree heatedly among
themselves over how these should be resolved. For example, what is the limit of
liberal toleration? Should liberal global institutions and liberal states tolerate ...
The difficult challenge for liberal toleration concerns what I shall refer to as ''
nonliberal'' practices, namely, practices that, while respectful of basic rights, reject
other quintessential liberal-democratic rights, such as the right of free expression
The latter is a compromise (for strategic or practical reasons) of liberal principles,
the former is a requirement and instantiation of liberal principles. It is in this
normative rather than pragmatic sense that most liberals understand toleration.15
So, a group that does not permit its members the right and freedom to reevaluate
and revise the internal practices and traditions of the group falls outside the
bounds of liberal toleration.42 But, as we have seen, political liberals want to
Достигнали сте ограничението си за преглед на тази книга.