Toleration, Diversity, and Global JusticePenn State Press, 5.11.2015 г. - 248 страници The "comprehensive liberalism" defended in this book offers an alternative to the narrower "political liberalism" associated with the writings of John Rawls. By arguing against making tolerance as fundamental a value as individual autonomy, and extending the reach of liberalism to global society, it opens the way for dealing more adequately with problems of human rights and economic inequality in a world of cultural pluralism. |
Между кориците на книгата
Резултати 1 - 5 от 64.
Страница ix
... arguments and issues covered here. The merits of this work, such as they are, are due largely to their generous efforts. Both encouraged the publication of the dissertation. David took active steps to ensure that I pursue this ...
... arguments and issues covered here. The merits of this work, such as they are, are due largely to their generous efforts. Both encouraged the publication of the dissertation. David took active steps to ensure that I pursue this ...
Страница xii
... arguments in these chapters. While references are made here occasionally to the political versus comprehensive liberal dispute (unavoidable given the underlying theme of this book), these references can be put to one side without ...
... arguments in these chapters. While references are made here occasionally to the political versus comprehensive liberal dispute (unavoidable given the underlying theme of this book), these references can be put to one side without ...
Страница 1
... argument is the recommendation that, foremost, state actors protect and promote their national interests), but even as a descriptive view, it is far from ''realistic.'' With the advent of the various international and regional ...
... argument is the recommendation that, foremost, state actors protect and promote their national interests), but even as a descriptive view, it is far from ''realistic.'' With the advent of the various international and regional ...
Страница 5
... at least, how they are to be ranked) and what kind of philosophical arguments can be appealed to in forwarding these values. So one can agree with this third feature of political liberalism without also having to INTRODUCTION 5.
... at least, how they are to be ranked) and what kind of philosophical arguments can be appealed to in forwarding these values. So one can agree with this third feature of political liberalism without also having to INTRODUCTION 5.
Страница 6
... arguments available to the political liberal in justifying liberalism in the public domain, namely, those that do not appeal to any comprehensive philosophical or moral doctrines, constrain the scope of political liberalism by exempting ...
... arguments available to the political liberal in justifying liberalism in the public domain, namely, those that do not appeal to any comprehensive philosophical or moral doctrines, constrain the scope of political liberalism by exempting ...
Съдържание
1 | |
19 | |
Two Liberal Views | 47 |
4 Individual Rights and State Sovereignty | 79 |
5 The Rights of Peoples | 103 |
6 The Problem of Oppressive Cultures | 129 |
7 Justice and Equality | 159 |
8 From Theory to Practice | 193 |
Bibliography | 219 |
Index | 229 |
Back Cover | 234 |
Други издания - Преглед на всички
Често срещани думи и фрази
able accept application argued argument associations autonomy basic belief calls challenge Chapter choice citizens claims collective rights commitment communitarian comprehensive liberalism conception concern context countries course criticisms cultural defend demands democratic developed DHSs discussion distinction distributive diversity doctrine domestic duties economic effects egalitarian endorse equal ethical example expression fact forced freedom fundamental give given global global theory governments granting ground groups hence hold human rights idea ideal identity important individual rights inequality institutions issue justice justify Kymlicka less liberty limits matter mean minority moral nonliberal objection oppressive particular persons philosophical policies political liberalism position possible practices present principle problem protect puts question Rawls Rawls’s reason regard reject requires respect response restrictions sense social society sovereignty specific theory tion toleration tradition treat United universal values violate