Toleration, Diversity, and Global JusticeThe "comprehensive liberalism" defended in this book offers an alternative to the narrower "political liberalism" associated with the writings of John Rawls. By arguing against making tolerance as fundamental a value as individual autonomy, and extending the reach of liberalism to global society, it opens the way for dealing more adequately with problems of human rights and economic inequality in a world of cultural pluralism. |
Какво казват хората - Напишете рецензия
Не намерихме рецензии на обичайните места.
Съдържание
1 | |
19 | |
Two Liberal Views | 47 |
4 Individual Rights and State Sovereignty | 79 |
5 The Rights of Peoples | 103 |
6 The Problem of Oppressive Cultures | 129 |
7 Justice and Equality | 159 |
8 From Theory to Practice | 193 |
Bibliography | 219 |
Index | 229 |
Back Cover | 234 |
Други издания - Преглед на всички
Често срещани думи и фрази
accept argued argument Asian Asian Values basic rights Beitz Bhutan challenge chap Chapter citizens claims collective rights commitment to individual communitarian comprehensive liberalism comprehensive moral comprehensive views conationals concern context of choice countries criticisms David Miller defend democracy democratic developed DHSs distributive justice diversity domestic economic egalitarian endorse equal ethical example freedom fundamental global context global inequality global justice global principles hence human rights Ibid idea individual autonomy individual liberty individual rights institutions internal restrictions justify Kymlicka liberal global theory liberal ideals liberal principles liberal societies liberal theory liberal toleration liberalism’s Miller minority moral community Multicultural Citizenship neutral nonliberal cultures nonliberal societies normative one’s oppressive overlapping consensus particular philosophical Pogge policies political liberalism political morality practices protect question Rawls Rawls’s reason reject Ronald Dworkin self-determination social sovereignty special duties Theory of Justice tion tional tradition universal universalistic violate Walzer