certain, though often unobserved, ravages of these, and such like, fell destroyers. From all which, and from all similar evils, your petitioners humbly pray for effectual and permanent relief. To AMICUS, an epithalamium Permit a friend, whose melancholy view Who would, for glittring honours, lose her charms : For thee, her lures are exercis'd in vain, EDWIN. LINES ADDRESSED TO MISS BEHOLD this rose which spreads In beauty now arrayed, This may thine emblem prove, The approach of Death can stay. His harbinger, Disease, Thy form, the funeral pall But Hope directs thine eyes Then like the buds that bloom TO CORRESPONDENTS. We should be pleased to be able to present our readers with something more from the pen of Perilla. Amelia's Reply to Ludovico shall be inserted with pleasure. P. W's Communication is before us. To say the least, it has the merit of being original-a trait, which unfortunately, is not possessed by two or three of the previous favours, received from the same person, though under different signatures. THE MICROSCOPE. EDITED BY A FRATERNITY OF GENTLEMEN. NEW-HAVEN, (CONN.) PUBLISHED BY A. H. MALTBY & CO. No. 24.] FRIDAY, JUNE 9, 1820. It moves me more perhaps than folly ought, When some green heads, as void of wit as thought, And wiser men's ability, pretence. Cowper. IT has often been remarked, that men of studious habits do not always exhibit that superiority in conversation, which might be expected, from their high attainments in learning. Seen through the medium of their works, or as they are represented by some intimate, who is able to appreciate their talents, they appear giants in intellect; seen in a polite cir cle, they exhibit evident marks of imbecility in their colloquial efforts. The deficiency alluded to, is produced by different causes in different individuals. One of these causes may be a want of familiarity with company-The person may be one, who is sensible, that certain rules of conduct have been established in polished society, and yet is ignorant of these rules-or if he has made himself acquainted with the etiquette and ceremonials of good manners, yet from the want of familiarity with the application of these rules in his own personal conduct, this very acquaintance, may embarrass him by making him the more sensible of the sins against the graces, which he is constantly committing. Perhaps he is brought before a bright array of beauty; or is placed in a circle of polished gentlemen, who have been so long hackneyed in all the complimentary expressions and current phrases of company, that every tone and inflection which Walker himself would have used, comes unbidden: thus sit uated, his mind is as much cramped in its operations, as ever was the fine form of a lady, by the shape-compelling corset; and instead of being able to convey a deep and copious stream into the general current of conversation, he can afford only a scanty and intermitting supply. A second cause may be too high a standard of taste. By elevating the standard of taste, the difficulties of accomplishing an object in which taste is concerned are enhanced, “despair cuts the sinews of exertion," and what might have been performed in a respectable manner is left unattempted, because complete success, is unattainable. There are innumerable instances of men of uncultivated minds and that too in the higher professions, who are useful, and to some extent, respectable. They are neither pained by the perception of present defects, nor by the recollection of past blunders. Elevate their taste, make them sensible of their defects and unless you raise the other powers of their mind in proportion, a sense of their defects will press so heavily on their feelings, that they will be discouraged from making exertions; and they thus become less useful and less respectable, than if they had blundered on in blissful ignorance. The student may be one who has cultivated his taste, much more than his inventive powers, in conversation: he may have heard of the "full flow of London talk ;" he may have made himself familiar with the best specimens of elegant conversation, as they appear in genteel comedy, or in scenes from real life; compared with the high standard he has formed, his own remarks appear tame and insipid, and he is ready to settle down on the conclusion that he must be content, with the humble admiration of excellence, without endeavouring to attain it. An additional one may be his ignorance of the topics of fashionable conversation, and his fear of incurring the charge of pedantry by introducing his favourite studies in company. I have some where seen it stated, that Boscovich, was the only philosopher that ever succeeded in introducing the sciences to which he was devoted, into mixed company in such a manner that they could enter with ease and interest into the discussions and not feel their pride wounded by his decided superiority, Mankind dislike even the appearance of a display of learning. The traveller may talk of the different places he has visited, the curiosities he has seen; may display his knowledge of the manners and customs of different nations, which he has gained by actual inspection. But this in a mixed company is not deemed ostentation. The soldier may describe his battles, and victories and all the "pride, pomp, and circumstance of glorious war," with a free use of military terms, without incurring the charge of ostentation. The sailor may in his descriptions go through his whole vocabulary of technical terms, and yet give no offence. But if a student, in the same situation, makes use of the terms of science and literature, and brings up to view his extensive attainments; the general cry is pedantry, pedantry. I was once in company with a gentleman of handsome literary attainments but of retired habits, who appeared to be unable to enter into conversation. He could not strike the joke which flew backwards and forwards like a shuttlecock. He could not analyze the beauty of a reticule, nor enter into the distinction between Nankin and Canton crapes, nor into the mysteries of real Merino shawls. One of the ladies, apparently from compassion, introduced some topic of literature: He seized upon it with avidity, and for a few minutes, they held a very animated discussion. The other ladies at first sat in silence, occasionally looking at each other but without discovering a single ray of feeling. Their faces however soon showed something more than apathy: though they smiled; yet there was something lurking in that smile, which put to flight all the graces that hovered round their lips. They appeared to feel that such topics should be proscribed in polite circles. What then could he say? His knowledge of the deflections of Greek verbs, does not assist him in following the digressions (pardon me ladies) in conversation his knowledge of Chemistry does not enable him to infuse into his remarks the "magic of politeness." There is no affinity between the attraction of matter and the attraction : And |