349

44, 478, 536, 541, 542, 546, 581 Vol. II, Gibbons vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1868; 8 Wallace, 269, MILLER, J., Vol. I, 536, 542, 546, 550 Gill vs. Oliver's Executors. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1850; 11 How. 529, GRIER, J., Vol. II, Gillespie vs. Winberg. N. Y. Ct. of Com. Pleas, 1872; 4 Daly, 318; DALY, Ch. J., Vol. I,

297

542

Gilliat, United States vs. See
United States vs. Gilliat.
Gilman vs. Philadelphia. U.
S. Sup. Ct. 1865; 3 Wallace,
713, SWAYNE, J., Vol. I,
536, 542

Glass vs. The Sloop Betsey.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1794; 3 Dallas,
6. PER CURIAM, Vol. II, 330, 345
Godfrey vs. Beardsley. U. S.

Cir. Ct. Indiana, 1841; 2 Mc-
Lean, 412, Fed. Cas. 5497,
MCLEAN, J., Vol. II,

217

Godfrey, Dawson's Lessee vs.

Sup. Ct. 1889; 130 U. S. 343, MILLER, J., Vol. II,

330

230

545, 547

217

Good vs. Martin. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1877, 95 U. S. 90, CLIF-
FORD, J., Vol. I,
Goodfellow vs. Muckey. U.S.
Cir. Ct. Kansas, 1881; 1 Mc-
Crary, 238, FOSTER, J.,
Vol. II,
Gordon vs. Kerr. U. S. Cir.
Ct. Penna. 1806; 1 Wash.
C. C. 322; Fed. Cas. 5611,
WASHINGTON, J., Vol. I, 278
Vol. II,
15, 38, 47, 146
Gordon, Respublica vs. See
Respublica vs. Gordon.
Gospel Society. See Society
for the Propogation of the
Gospel.

Graham, Strader vs.

See Stra

See Sli

der vs. Graham. Grandjean, Slidell vs. dell vs. Grandjean. Gratiot, United States vs. See United States vs. Gratiot.

Grapeshot, The. U. S. Sup.

Ct. 1869; 9 Wallace, 129,
CHASE, Ch. J., Vol. I, 500, 545

Gray vs. Coffman. U. S. Cir.
Ct. Kansas. 1874; 3 Dillon,
393, Fed. Cas. 5714, DIL-
LON, J., Vol. II,
Gray vs. United States. U.S.
Ct. of Claims, 1886; 21 Ct. of

551

217

Page

284

Claims, 340, DAVIS, J., Vol. II, Great Western Ins. Co. vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1884; 112 U. S. 193, MILLER, J., Vol. I, 544, 555, 558, 560 Vol. II, 288, 361 Greenman, Juilliard vs. See Juilliard vs. Greenman. Greneaux, Prevost vs. See Prevost vs. Greneaux.

Grima, Mager vs. See Mager
vs. Grima.

Griswold, Hepburn vs. See
Hepburn vs. Griswold.
Griswold vs. Atlantic Dock
Co. N. Y. Sup. Ct. 1855;
21 Barbour, 225, STRONG, J.,
Vol. I,
542, 558, 560
Grisar vs. McDowell. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1867; 6 Wallace, 363,
FIELD, J.; affirming Same
Case, U. S. Cir. Ct. Cala.
1866; 4 Sawyer, 597, Fed.
Cas. 5832, FIELD, J., Vol. II,

146, 165

Groover, Coffee vs. See Coffee vs. Groover.

Gue Lim (Mrs), United States

vs. See United States vs. Gue Lim (Mrs.).

Guiyot, Hilton vs. See Hilton vs. Guiyot.

Gustavus, The Schooner Henry and. See Schooner Henry and Gustavus.

Guthrie vs. Hall. Dist. Ct. Oklahoma, 1891; 1 Okla. 454, SEAY, J., Vol. II,

Page

Hamilton vs. Dillin. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1874; 21 Wallace, 73,
BRADLEY, J., Vol. I, 536, 551
Hamilton vs. Eaton. U. S.
Cir. Ct. Nor. Car. 1792; 1
Hughes, 249; Fed. Cas. 5980,
ELLSWORTH, Ch. J., SIT-
GREAVES, J., Vol. II,
Hanes, Langdeau vs. See Lang-
deau vs. Hanes.

Happersett, Minor VS. See
Minor vs. Happersett.
Harcourt vs. Gaillard. U.S.
Sup. Ct. 1827; 12 Wheaton,
523, Johnson, J., Vol. I,
Hardy, Holden vs. See Holden
vs. Hardy.

Harkness vs. Hyde. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1878; 98 U. S. 476,
FIELD, J., Vol. II,

Harmony, Mitchell vs. See
Mitchell vs. Harmony.

VS.

Harnden, Denn ex dem. Fisher See Denn ex dem. Fisher vs. Harnden. Harnden vs. Fisher. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1816; 1 Wheaton, 300, MARSHALL, Ch. J., reversing Fisher vs. Harnden, 1 Paine, C. C. 55, LIVINGSTON, J., Vol. II. Harnden, Fisher vs. er vs. Harnden. Harrisburg, The. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1886; 119 U. S. 199, WAITE, Ch. J., Vol. I, Harrison, Cross vs. See Cross vs. Harrison.

13

238

229

15, 61, 62, 179 See Fish

See

vs. Harrison.

See Cook vs.

Habana, The Paquette. Paquette Habana, The. Hadden vs. Collector, The. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1866; 5 Wallace, 107, FIELD, J., Vol. II, Hagan, Pollard vs. See Pollard vs. Hagan.

Hale, Dainese vs. See Dainese vs. Hale.

73

Hart, Cook vs.

Hart.

155

Hartland, Society for Propaga-
tion of the Gospel vs. See
Society &c., vs. Hartland.
Hartranft vs. Wiegman. U.
S. Sup. Ct. 1887; 121 U. S.
609, BLATCHFORD, J., Vol. 1, 547
Harwood, Clarke VS. See
Clarke vs. Harwood.
Haskins vs. United States. See
Brig William, The.
Hathaway, United States vs.
See United States vs. Hatha-
way.

Hauenstein vs. Lynhan. U.
S. Sup. Ct. 1879; 100 U. S.
483, SWAYNE, J., Vol. II,

1, 20, 21, 43, 44, 54, 321, 349 Havana, The Barque. See Barque Havana, The.

Haven De, Town VS. See
Town vs. De Haven.
Haver vs. Yaker. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1869; 9 Wallace, 32,
DAVIS, J, (same as Jecker
vs. Magee), Vol. I, 125, 497, 555
558, 561
Vol. II,
56, 127, 129, 146
Hawaiian Insular Case. See
Crossman vs. United States.
Hawaii &c. Lewis vs. See Lewis
vs. Hawaii &c.

Hawaii &c., Peacock vs. See
Peacock vs. Hawaii.

Hawes, Commonwealth vs. See
Commonwealth vs. Hawes.
Hays, Ridgway vs. See Ridg-

way vs. Hays. Hayward, United States vs. See United States vs. Hayward. Head Money Cases. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1884; 112 U. S. 580, BLATCHFORD, J., (same as Edye vs. Robertson), Vol. I, 455, 471, 491, 544, 546, 552, 555 557, 558, 560, 561, 567 Vol. II, 63, 77, 82, 83, 86, 96, 97 106, 145, 183, 361 Heard vs. Bradford. Sup. Ct. Mass. 1808; 4 Mass. 326, SEDGWICK, J., Vol. II, Heard vs. Sturges. See Williams vs. Heard. Heard, Williams vs. See Williams vs. Heard. Hedden, North German Lloyd S. S. vs. See North Ger. &c. vs. Hedden.

Heilbronn, In re. U. S. Dt. Ct.

297

S. D. N. Y. 1854; Fed. Cas. 6323, INGERSOLL, J., Vol. II, 404 Heirs of Pollard vs. Kibbe. See

Pollard's Heirs vs. Kibbe, Heirs of Robouam vs. Exrs. of Robouam. See Robouam's Heirs vs. Robouam's Ex'rs. Heirs of Yeaker vs. Heirs of Yeaker. See Yeaker's Heirs vs. Yeaker's Heirs. Heist, Norman vs. See Norman vs. Heist. Henderson vs. Mayor of New York (Passenger cases). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1875; 92 U. S. 259, MILLER, J., Vol. II, Henderson vs. Tennessee. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1850; 10 Howard, 311, TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. II, 217 Henfield's Case. U. S. Cir.

50

540, 557

155

Hepburn vs. Griswold (Legal Tender Case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1869; 8 Wallace, 603, CHASE, Ch. J., Vol. I, 62, 536, 541 Herman vs. New Orleans &c. R. R. Co. Sup. Ct. Louisiana, 1856; 11 La Ann. 5, MERRICK, Ch. J., Vol. I, Hero, The Liverpool. See Liverpool Hero, The. Herris (or Herres) In re. U. S. Dist. Ct. Minn. 1887; 33 Fed. Rep. 583, BREWER, J., reversing s. c. 32 Fed. Rep. 583, NELSON, J., Vol. II, Hibbs, Ex parte. U. S. Dist. Ct. Oregon, 1886; 26 Fed. Rep. 421, DEADY, J., Vol. II, 264, 271 Higginson vs. Mein. U. S.

Sup. Ct. 1808; 4 Cranch, 415,
MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. II,
Higueras vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1864; 5 Wal-
lace, 827, CLIFFORD, J.,
Vol. II,

Hill vs. United States. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1893; 149 U. S. 593,
GRAY, J., Vol. I,

Hill, United States vs. See
United States vs. Hill.
Hillmer, Doeherel vs. See Doch-
erel vs. Hillmer.

Hilton vs. Brown. See Hylton
vs. Brown.

264

12

165

550

Hilton vs. Guiyot. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1895; 159 U. S. 113,
GRAY, J., Vol. II,
98, 304
Hilton vs. Merritt (Collector).
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1884; 110 U.
S. 97, Woods, J., Vol. II,
Hilton, Ware vs. See Ware

98

Hoag, Orser vs. See Orser vs.
Hoag.

Ho-Ah-Kow vs. Nunan (Chin-
ese Queue Case). U. S. Cir.
Ct. Cala. 1879; 5 Sawyer, 552,
FIELD, J., Vol. II, 1, 29, 31
Hoboken Co., Murray vs. See
Murray vs. Hoboken Co.
Hodgson, Orr vs. See Orr vs.
Hodgson.

Hof, Capital Traction Co. vs.
See Capital Traction Co. vs.
Hof.

Ho King, In re. U. S. Dist.
Ct. Oregon, 1883; 14 Fed.
Rep. 724; 8 Sawyer, 438,
DEADY, J., Vol. II,
Holbrook vs. United States.
U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1884; 21
Ct. Clms. 434, DAVIS, J.,
Vol. II,

115

284

Hope, Callsen vs. See Callsen vs. Hope.

Hopkins, Yick Wo vs. See

Page

13, 19

Yick Wo vs. Hopkins.
Hopkirk vs. Bell. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1806-7 (2 cases); 3
Cranch, 453; 4 Cranch, 163,
PER CURIAM. Vol. II,
Hornbuckle vs. Toombs. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1873; 18 Wallace,
648, BRADLEY, J., Vol. I, 539, 548
Horner vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1892; 143 U. S.
570, BLATCHFORD, J.
Houston, Brown vs. See Brown
vs. Houston.

Howell, United States vs. See
United States vs. Howell.
Hoyt, Gelston vs. See Gelston
vs. Hoyt.

Hubbell vs. United States. See
Caldera cases.

Hubgh vs. New Orleans &c.
R. R. Co. Sup. Ct. Louisi-
ana, 1851; 6 La. Ann. 495.
EUSTIS, J., Vol. I,
Huckabee, United States ex rel.
&c. vs. United States ex rel.
Lyon vs. Huckabee.
Hughes vs. Edwards. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1824; 9 Wheaton,
489, WASHINGTON, J., Vol.

II,
Hunt, Hallet vs.

vs. Hunt.

Hunter, Fairfax vs.

fax vs. Hunter.

155

14, 22, 43, 179 See Hallet

See Fair

ness vs. Hyde.

See Hark

Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. vs.
Illinois. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1892; 146 U. S. 387, FIELD,
J., Vol. II,
158, 314, 318
See

Illinois, State of, Ker, vs.
Ker vs. State of Illinois.
Illinois Steel Co. vs. Budzisz.
U. S. Cir. Ct. Wisconsin,
1897; 82 Fed. Rep. 160, SEA-
MAN, J., Vol. II,

Illinois Steel Co., Budzisz vs.
See Budzisz vs. Illinois Steel
Co.

Income Tax Case. See Pol

lock vs. Farmers L. & T. Co.
Indemnity, Chinese Cases. See
Caldera Cases.
Indian names. See Alberty

vs. United States; In re Cup-
tain Jack; Cherokee Nation
Cases; Ex parte Crow Dog;
Elk VS. Wilkins; Famous
Smith VS. United States;
Fellows VS. Blacksmith;
Frost vs. Wenie; In re Gon-
Shay-Ee; Goodfellow VS.
Muckey; Journeycake VS.
Cherokee Nation; Journey-
cake vs. United States; Kan-
sas Indians, The; In re May-
field; New York Indians,
The; New York Indians vs.
United States; Nofire vs.
United States; Pam-to-pee
vs. United States; Potawata-

225

Page

mie Indian VS. United States; In re Race Horse; Sah Quah's Case; Seneca Nation vs. Christie; Stephens vs. Cherokee Nation; Thebo vs. Choctaw Tribe of Indians; United States vs. Bridleman; United States vs. Joseph; United States vs. Kagama; United States vs. Leathers; United States vs. New York Indians; United States vs. Pridgeon; United States vs. Sturgeon; United States vs. Sunol; United States VS. Yellow Sun; Ward vs. Race Horse; Western Cherokee Indians vs. United States. Indians, The New York vs. United States. See New York Indians vs. United States. Indians, The Kansas. See Kansas Indians, The. Ingersoll, Maiden VS. See Maiden vs. Ingersoll.

Inglis vs. Sailors Snug Harbor. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1830;

3 Peters, 99, THOMPSON, J.,

Vol. I,

Vol. II,

554, 555, 557, 558, 561
169

In re. See name of party. But
also see Chinese names; In-
dian
names; Extradition
matters; In re generally.
In re generally. See Alter's Ap-
peal; In re Atorha; In re
Ayers; In re Baez; In re
Baldwin; Calvin's Case; The
Clinton Bridge; In re
Cooper; Dainese's Case;
In re Debs; Desbois' Case;
Fichera's Case; Henfield's
Case; Jugiro, In re Shibuya;
In re Kemmler; Kennett's
Petition; Lopez and Sattler's
Case; Lord Bishop of Natal;
Ex parte Me Neil; Ex parte
Milligan; In re Neagle; Ex
parte Ortiz; In re Panzara;
In re Tuburchio Parrott;
In re Quarles; Sah Quah's
Case; Ex parte Scott; Ex
parte Siebold; In re Tatsu;
Ex parte Valandigham; In
re Vidal.
Insular Cases. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1901; 182 U. S. 1-392 (re-
ferred to collectively). See
also separate references to