Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub
[blocks in formation]

552, 561 84, 128, 146, 165 See Ten.

Davis, Tennessee vs.
nessee vs. Davis.
Davis, United States vs. See
United States vs. Davis.
Dawson's Lessee vs. Godfrey.

U. S. Sup. Ct. 1808; 4 Cranch, 321; JOHNSON, J., Vol. II, 16, 167 Deacon, Short vs. See Short vs. Deacon,

Debs, In re. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1895, 158 U. S. 564, BREWER, J., Vol. I,

536, 545

Decker, Jackson vs.

See Jack

[blocks in formation]

Delassus vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1835, 9 Peters, 117, MARSHALL, Ch. J. Vol. I, 537, 554, 555 Vol. II, 147, 165, 179 De Lima vs. Bidwell (Insular case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901, 182 U. S. 1, BROWN, J., Vol. I, 28, 60, 118, 119, 120, 121 122, 123, 125, 126, 461, 467, 468 469, 475, 476, 495, 499, 502, 506 507, 564, 566, 567, 573, 576, 584 Vol. II, 67, 180

De Longchamps, Respublica vs. See Respublica vs. DeLongchamps. Denn ex dem. Fisher vs. Harnden. U. S. Cir. Ct., 2d Circ., 1812; 1 Paine, C. C. R. 55, LIVINGSTON, J., Vol. II, 38, 61, 146 Denis, Burthe vs. See Burthe vs. Denis. Dennick vs. R. R. Co. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1880; 103 U. S. 11, MILLER, J., Vol. I,

155

See

Dennick vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1880; 103 U. S. 11, MILLER, J., Vol. I, Denniston, Fellows vs. Fellows vs. Denniston. Desbois' Case. Sup. Ct. La. 1812; 1 Martin N. S. 285, 2 Martin O. S. 185, MARTIN, J., Vol. II,

Detroit, Attorney General vs. See Attorney General vs. Detroit.

De Uriarte,

Castro VS. See Castro vs. De Uriarte. Diamond Rings. See Fourteen Diamond Rings.

Dibble, Cutler vs. See Cutler vs. Dibble.

Dickert & M. Sulphur Co., Utah M. & Mfg. Co. vs. See Utah &c. Co. vs. Dickert &c. Co. Dickson, United States vs. See United States vs. Dickson. Diekelman, United States vs. See United Slates vs. Diekelman.

Dillin, Hamilton vs. See Hamilton vs. Dillin.

Direct Tax (Carriages) Case. See Hylton vs. Brown. District of Col., Barnes

VS.

See Barnes vs. Dist. of Col. District of Columbia, Gibbons VS. See Gibbons vs. Dist. of Col. District of Columbia, Mattingly VS. See Mattingly vs. Dist. of Col.

District of Columbia, Metropoli-
tan R. R. Co. vs. See Metro-
politan R. R. Co. vs. Dist. of
Col.
Dixon vs. United States. U. S.
Cir. Ct. Virginia, 1811; 1
Brockenbrough, 177, MAR-
SHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I,
Doane, Penhallow vs. See Pen-
hallow vs. Doane.
Dochrel vs. Hillmer. Sup. Ct.

Iowa, 1897; 102 Iowa, 169,
LADD, J., Vol. II,

Dock Co., Atlantic, Griswold vs. See Griswold vs. Atlantic Dock Co.

169

548

44

Dodge vs. Woolsey. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1855; 18 Howard,
331, WAYNE, J., Vol. I, 536, 544
Vol. II,
361

Doe vs. Braden. See Clark vs.
Braden.

155

Doe vs. Wilson. U. S. Sup.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

474

Ala. Sup. Ct. 1874; 53 Ala. 411, JUDGE, J., Vol. I, Donoyer, State (No. Dak.) Ex rel. Tompton vs. See State &c. vs. Donoyer. Dooley, Smith & Co. vs. United States No. 1, (Insular Cases, Porto Rico War Tariff). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901; 182 U. S. 222, BROWN, J., Vol. I, 119, 124, 127, 461, 469, 495 496, 501, 502, 569, 571, 573, 576 Vol. II, 129 Dooley, Smith & Co. vs. United States No. 2, (Insular case, Porto Rico Duties). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901; 183 or 184 U. S., BROWN, J., Vol. I., 119 124, 461, 469, 495, 496, 501, 569 Vol. II, 129

Dos Santos, Ex parte. U. S.
Cir. Ct. Virginia, 1835; 2
Brockenbrough, 493; Fed.
Cas. 4016, BARBOUR, J., Vol.
II,
Douglas, United States vs. See
United States vs. Douglas.

Dow vs. Johnson. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1879; 100 U. S. 158,
FIELD, J., Vol. I,

Vol. II,

255

536, 550

24

Dow, Maxwell vs. See Maxwell

vs. Dow.

Downes vs. Bidwell (Insular

case, Foraker Act). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901; 182 U. S. 244, BROWN, J., Vol. I, 28, 60, 119 123, 127, 443, 461, 469, 474, 476 482, 489, 491, 495, 501, 566, 569 572, 578, 576, 577, 578 Vol. II, 4, 24, 124, 283 Draper vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1896; 164 U. S. 240, WHITE, J, Vol. II,

Dow's Case. Sup. Ct. Penna.

1851; 18 Penn. St. 37, GIBSON, C. J., Vol. II,

phate Co. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 137 U. S. 647, GRAY, J., Vol. I, Dunlop vs. Alexander. U. S. Cir. Ct. Dist. of Col., 1808; 1 Cranch C. C. 498, Vol. II, Dupont, Shanks VS. See Shanks vs. Dupont. Duryee vs. Mayor of New York. N. Y. Ct. of App. 1884; 96 N. Y. 477, RUGER, Ch. J., Vol. I, Dutilh vs. Coursault. U. S. Cir. Ct. Dist. of Col. 1837; 5 Cranch C. C. 349, CRANCH Ch. J., Vol. II, Early, Postmaster General vs. See Postmaster General vs. Early.

60

17

70

297

Eastern Band of Cherokees vs. United States. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1885; 20 Ct. of Clms. 449, RICHARDSON, J., Vol. II, 214, 235 Eaton, Hamilton vs. See Hamilton vs. Eaton. Eaton, United States vs. See United States vs. Eaton.

See

Eckhart, Chouteau VS.
Chouteau vs. Eckhart.
Edwards, Hughes VS. See
Hughes vs. Edwards.
Edye vs. Robertson. (Head
Money Cases). U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1884; 112 U. S. 580, MIL-
LER, J., affirming U. S. Cir.
Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1883; 21
Blatchford, 460, BLATCH-
FORD, J., Vol. I,
Vol. II,

455

82, 86, 97, 106 Eells vs. Ross. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th Circ. 1894; 64 Fed. Rep. 417, McKENNA, J., Vol.

II, 214, 225 Eells, Ross vs. See Ross vs. Eells.

Eisner, Saxlehner vs. See Saxlehner vs. Eisner. Ekiu, Nishimura, vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 142 U. S. 651, GRAY, J., Vol. 55, 190, 536, 552 Vol. II, 97, 104, 109, 121, 122, 259 Elam, Foster and, vs. Nelson. See Foster and Elam vs. Nel

86

I,

278

Dred Scott case. See Scott vs.

Sandford.

[blocks in formation]

son.

Eleventh Amendment case. See
State of Georgia vs. Brails-
ford.
Eliza and Cargo, The. U. S.

[blocks in formation]

Privy Council,

1830; 1

551

Knapp's Privy Council Cases, 316, Vattel, 365, 3 Phillimore's Int. Law, 505, LORD TENTERDEN, Vol. I, Elwine Kreplin, The. U. S. Dist. Ct. E. D. N. Y. 1870; 4 Benedict, 413; Fed. Cas. No. 4426, BENEDICT, J.; reversed U. S. Cir. Ct. 1871, 9 Blatchford, 438, WOODRUFF, J., and see Ex parte Newman. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1872; 14 Wallace, 152, CLIFFORD, J., Vol. II. 238, 330, 333, 342 Ely, Baldwin vs. See Baldwin vs. Ely. Emerson VS. Hall. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1839; 13 Peters, 409, MCLEAN, J., Vol. II,

Emert vs. Missouri.

U. S.

297

542

Sup. Ct. 1894; 156 U. S. 296, GRAY, J., Vol. I, Endleman vs. United States. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th Cir. 1898; 57 U. S. App. 1, 86 Fed. Rep. 456, MORROW, J., Vol. I, 537, 539 Englebrecht, Clinton vs. See Clinton vs. Englebrecht. English vs. Sailors' Snug Harbor. See Ingles vs. Sailors, &c.

Errol, Coe vs. See Coe vs. Errol.

Erwin vs. United States.

U.

[blocks in formation]

uam's Heirs vs. Robouam's Exrs.

Ex parte and In re; See names of parties, but see also: Chinese names; Indian names; Extradition, Ex parte; In re generally.

Export Тах (War Revenue Cuse). See Fairbank vs. United States, Dooley vs. United States, No. 2.

Extradition, Ex parte; In re Baruch; In re Behrendt; In re Breen; In re British Prisoners; In re Cannon; In

re

Page

Carrier; In re Charlestown; In re Cortes; In re Cox; In re Cross; In re De Giacomo; Ex parte Dos Santos; Dow's Case; In re Dugan; In re Ezeta; In re Farez; In re Ferrelle; Ex parte Foss; In re Fowler; In re Heilbronn ; In re Henrich; In re Herris or Herres; Ex parte Hibbs; Ex parte Holmes; In re Kaine; In re Kelley (Peter); In re Kelly; In re Ker (Ker vs. Illinois); In re Kronjaker; Ex parte Lane; Lopez & Sattler's Case; In re Ludwig; Ex parte McCabe ; In re MacDonnell; In re McPhun; In re Metzgar or Metzger; In re Miller; In re Mineau; Muller's Case; In re Neely (Neely vs. Henkel); In re Newman; In re Orpen; In re Palmer; In re Pederson; In re Rahrer; In re Reinitz; In re Risch; In re Roderiguez; Ex parte Ross; In re Roth; In re Rowe.; Ex parte Sternaman; In re Thomas; Ex parte Van Aerman; In re Vandervelpen; Ex parte Van Hoven (2 Cases); In re Veremaitre; In re Wadge; In re Wohl; In re Washburn; In re Weiyand; Wildenhus's Case. Ezeta, In re. U. S. Dist. Ct. Cala. 1894; 62 Fed. Rep. 964 and 972, MORROW, J., Vol. II, 266, 268 Fabrigas, Mostyn vs. See Mostyn vs. Fabrigas. Factory Tobacco, United States VS. See United States vs. Tobacco Factory.

Page

Fairbank vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901; 181
U. S. 283, BREWER, J.,
Vol. I, 126, 546, 548, 571, 575, 578
Fairfax vs. Hunter. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1813; 7 Cranch,
603, STORY, J., Vol. II,

1, 13, 14, 43, 246

229

Fama, The. High Ct. of Admiralty, 1804; 5 Robinson, 106, SIR WM. SCOTT, Vol. I, 554 Vol. II, 161, 166, 470 Famous Smith VS. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1894; 151 U. S. 50, BROWN, J., Vol. II, Farez, In re. (3 Cases). U.S. Dist. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1869 and 1870; 7 Blatchford, 34, 345, 491, Fed. Cas. 4644, 4645, 4646; BLATCHFORD J., and WOODRUFF, J., Vol. II, Farmers Loan & Trust Co., Pollock vs. See Pollock vs. Farmers L. & T. Co. Fassett Collector, &c., Case. See Conqueror, The. Fellows vs. Blacksmith. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1856. 19 Howard, 366, NELSON, J., Vol. I, 140 Vol. II, 207, 212, 216, 229 Fellows, Blacksmith vs. See Blacksmith vs. Fellows. Fellows vs. Denniston. N. Y.

263

Ct. of Appeals, 1861; 23
N. Y. 420, DENIO, J., Vol. II, 36
Feol VS. Salamoni. U. S.
Dist. Ct. Georgia, 1886; 29
Fed. Rep. 534, SPEER, J.,
Vol. II,
331, 333
Ferguson, Bodley VS. See

Bodley vs. Ferguson.
Ferreira, United States VS.
United States vs. Ferreira.
Ferrelle, In re. U. S. Cir.
Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1886; 28 Fed.
Rep. 878, BROWN, J.,
Vol. II,

Fichera's Case. U. S. Ct. of
Claims, 1873; 9 Ct. of Clms.
254; NOTT, J., Vol. I,

264

550

Field vs. Clark. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1892; 143 U. S. 649,
HARLAN, J., Vol. I, 481, 540, 544

546

Vol. II, 3, 144, 335, 354, 361 Files, Pollard's Lessee vs. See Pollard's Lessee vs. Files. Finley, Buckner vs. See Buckner vs. Finley.

[blocks in formation]

Fong Yue Ting vs. United States (Chinese Exclusion case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1893; 149 U. S. 698, GRAY, J., Vol. I, 16, 28, 55, 139, 141, 190 479, 535, 552, 557, 558, 560 Vol. II, 84, 86, 103, 107, 109, 110 111, 121, 122, 259 Försöket, The. U. S. Dist. Penna. 1801; 1 Peters Adm. Rep. 197, PETERS, J., Vol. II,

Ct.

330 Fort Leavenworth R. R. Co. VS. Lowe. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1885; 114 U. S. 525, FIELD, J., Vol. II, Forty-three

Gallons of

Brandy, In re. U. S. Cir. Ct. Minn. 1882; 11 Fed. Rep. 47, MCCRARY, J. Forty-three Gallons of Whiskey, United States vs. See United States vs. Forty-three &c. Foss, Ex parte. Sup. Ct.

194

[blocks in formation]

268

Cala. 1894; 102 Cala. 347, DEHAVEN, J., Vol. II, Foster, United States vs. See United States vs. Foster. Foster and Elam vs. Neilson. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1829; 2 Peters, 253, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I, 140, 431, 471, 537

544, 553, 554, 555, 558, 560, 567 Vol. II, 63, 66, 67, 79, 84, 106 146, 147, 165, 324, 361 Fourteen Diamond Rings, Pepke Claimant (Insular case). U. S. Sup. Ct., decided Dec. 2, 1901; BROWN, J., Vol. I, 119, 122, 461, 466, 467 563, 573, 576 Fouvergne vs. City of New Orleans. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1855; 18 Howard, 470, CAMPBELL, J., Vol. II, Fowler, In re George. U. S. Dist. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1880; 18 Blatchford, 430, BLATCHford, J., Vol. II,

Fox vs. Southack. Sup. Ct.
Mass. 1815; 12 Mass. 143,
JACKSON, J., Vol. II,

Franklin County Commr's,
Pennock VS. See Pennock
vs. Franklin County &c.
Franks, Baldwin VS. See
Baldwin vs. Franks.

Frederickson VS. State of
Louisiana. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1859; 23 Howard, 445, CAMP-
BELL, J., Vol. II,

163

[blocks in formation]

264

See

15

[blocks in formation]

41, 52

See

Freehold Co. (United States),
Tameling vs. See Tameling
vs. United States Freehold &c.
Freeman, Chy Lung vs.
Chy Lung vs. Freeman.
Frelinghuysen vs. Key. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1884; 110 U. S. 63,
WAITE, Ch. J., Vol. I, 544,
558, 560
309, 361

Vol. II,
Fremont vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1854; 17 How-
ard 542, TANEY, Ch. J.,
Vol. II,

French Republic vs. Schultze.
See Republic Francaise vs.
Schultz.

French Spoliation Claims Cases.
See Brig Venus, The. Brig
William, The. Cushing vs.
United States. Gray vs. Uni-
ted States. Hooper vs. Uni-
ted States. Leghorn Seizures,

152

Garcia vs. Lee. Ct. 1838; 12 TANEY, Ch. J.,

Vol. II,

Garrison vs. United States. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1895; 30 Ct. of Claims, 272, PEELLE, J., Vol. II,

Gay, Thomas vs. See Thomas vs. Gay.

223

Gee Fook Sing vs. United States. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th Cir. 1892; 7 U. S. App. 27, HANDFORD, J., Vol. II, 118 Gee Fook Sing vs. United States. See Lem Hing Dun vs. United States.

111

Gee Hop, In re. U. S. Dist. Ct. Cala. 1895; 71 Fed. Rep. 274, MORROW, J., Vol. II, Gelston vs. Hoyt. N. Y. Ct. of Errors, 1816; 13 Johnson, 561, KENT, Chan., Vol. II, 358 Genessee Chief, The. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1851; 12 Howard, 443, TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. I, 541, 545 Geofroy vs. Riggs. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1890; 133 U. S. 258, FIELD, J., Vol. I, 190, 493, 540, 552, 553

« ПредишнаНапред »