552, 561 84, 128, 146, 165 See Ten. Davis, Tennessee vs. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1808; 4 Cranch, 321; JOHNSON, J., Vol. II, 16, 167 Deacon, Short vs. See Short vs. Deacon, Debs, In re. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1895, 158 U. S. 564, BREWER, J., Vol. I, 536, 545 Decker, Jackson vs. See Jack Delassus vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1835, 9 Peters, 117, MARSHALL, Ch. J. Vol. I, 537, 554, 555 Vol. II, 147, 165, 179 De Lima vs. Bidwell (Insular case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901, 182 U. S. 1, BROWN, J., Vol. I, 28, 60, 118, 119, 120, 121 122, 123, 125, 126, 461, 467, 468 469, 475, 476, 495, 499, 502, 506 507, 564, 566, 567, 573, 576, 584 Vol. II, 67, 180 De Longchamps, Respublica vs. See Respublica vs. DeLongchamps. Denn ex dem. Fisher vs. Harnden. U. S. Cir. Ct., 2d Circ., 1812; 1 Paine, C. C. R. 55, LIVINGSTON, J., Vol. II, 38, 61, 146 Denis, Burthe vs. See Burthe vs. Denis. Dennick vs. R. R. Co. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1880; 103 U. S. 11, MILLER, J., Vol. I, 155 See Dennick vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1880; 103 U. S. 11, MILLER, J., Vol. I, Denniston, Fellows vs. Fellows vs. Denniston. Desbois' Case. Sup. Ct. La. 1812; 1 Martin N. S. 285, 2 Martin O. S. 185, MARTIN, J., Vol. II, Detroit, Attorney General vs. See Attorney General vs. Detroit. De Uriarte, Castro VS. See Castro vs. De Uriarte. Diamond Rings. See Fourteen Diamond Rings. Dibble, Cutler vs. See Cutler vs. Dibble. Dickert & M. Sulphur Co., Utah M. & Mfg. Co. vs. See Utah &c. Co. vs. Dickert &c. Co. Dickson, United States vs. See United States vs. Dickson. Diekelman, United States vs. See United Slates vs. Diekelman. Dillin, Hamilton vs. See Hamilton vs. Dillin. Direct Tax (Carriages) Case. See Hylton vs. Brown. District of Col., Barnes VS. See Barnes vs. Dist. of Col. District of Columbia, Gibbons VS. See Gibbons vs. Dist. of Col. District of Columbia, Mattingly VS. See Mattingly vs. Dist. of Col. District of Columbia, Metropoli- Iowa, 1897; 102 Iowa, 169, Dock Co., Atlantic, Griswold vs. See Griswold vs. Atlantic Dock Co. 169 548 44 Dodge vs. Woolsey. U. S. Doe vs. Braden. See Clark vs. 155 Doe vs. Wilson. U. S. Sup. 474 Ala. Sup. Ct. 1874; 53 Ala. 411, JUDGE, J., Vol. I, Donoyer, State (No. Dak.) Ex rel. Tompton vs. See State &c. vs. Donoyer. Dooley, Smith & Co. vs. United States No. 1, (Insular Cases, Porto Rico War Tariff). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901; 182 U. S. 222, BROWN, J., Vol. I, 119, 124, 127, 461, 469, 495 496, 501, 502, 569, 571, 573, 576 Vol. II, 129 Dooley, Smith & Co. vs. United States No. 2, (Insular case, Porto Rico Duties). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901; 183 or 184 U. S., BROWN, J., Vol. I., 119 124, 461, 469, 495, 496, 501, 569 Vol. II, 129 Dos Santos, Ex parte. U. S. Dow vs. Johnson. U. S. Sup. Vol. II, 255 536, 550 24 Dow, Maxwell vs. See Maxwell vs. Dow. Downes vs. Bidwell (Insular case, Foraker Act). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901; 182 U. S. 244, BROWN, J., Vol. I, 28, 60, 119 123, 127, 443, 461, 469, 474, 476 482, 489, 491, 495, 501, 566, 569 572, 578, 576, 577, 578 Vol. II, 4, 24, 124, 283 Draper vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1896; 164 U. S. 240, WHITE, J, Vol. II, Dow's Case. Sup. Ct. Penna. 1851; 18 Penn. St. 37, GIBSON, C. J., Vol. II, phate Co. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 137 U. S. 647, GRAY, J., Vol. I, Dunlop vs. Alexander. U. S. Cir. Ct. Dist. of Col., 1808; 1 Cranch C. C. 498, Vol. II, Dupont, Shanks VS. See Shanks vs. Dupont. Duryee vs. Mayor of New York. N. Y. Ct. of App. 1884; 96 N. Y. 477, RUGER, Ch. J., Vol. I, Dutilh vs. Coursault. U. S. Cir. Ct. Dist. of Col. 1837; 5 Cranch C. C. 349, CRANCH Ch. J., Vol. II, Early, Postmaster General vs. See Postmaster General vs. Early. 60 17 70 297 Eastern Band of Cherokees vs. United States. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1885; 20 Ct. of Clms. 449, RICHARDSON, J., Vol. II, 214, 235 Eaton, Hamilton vs. See Hamilton vs. Eaton. Eaton, United States vs. See United States vs. Eaton. See Eckhart, Chouteau VS. 455 82, 86, 97, 106 Eells vs. Ross. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th Circ. 1894; 64 Fed. Rep. 417, McKENNA, J., Vol. II, 214, 225 Eells, Ross vs. See Ross vs. Eells. Eisner, Saxlehner vs. See Saxlehner vs. Eisner. Ekiu, Nishimura, vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 142 U. S. 651, GRAY, J., Vol. 55, 190, 536, 552 Vol. II, 97, 104, 109, 121, 122, 259 Elam, Foster and, vs. Nelson. See Foster and Elam vs. Nel 86 I, 278 Dred Scott case. See Scott vs. Sandford. son. Eleventh Amendment case. See Privy Council, 1830; 1 551 Knapp's Privy Council Cases, 316, Vattel, 365, 3 Phillimore's Int. Law, 505, LORD TENTERDEN, Vol. I, Elwine Kreplin, The. U. S. Dist. Ct. E. D. N. Y. 1870; 4 Benedict, 413; Fed. Cas. No. 4426, BENEDICT, J.; reversed U. S. Cir. Ct. 1871, 9 Blatchford, 438, WOODRUFF, J., and see Ex parte Newman. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1872; 14 Wallace, 152, CLIFFORD, J., Vol. II. 238, 330, 333, 342 Ely, Baldwin vs. See Baldwin vs. Ely. Emerson VS. Hall. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1839; 13 Peters, 409, MCLEAN, J., Vol. II, Emert vs. Missouri. U. S. 297 542 Sup. Ct. 1894; 156 U. S. 296, GRAY, J., Vol. I, Endleman vs. United States. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th Cir. 1898; 57 U. S. App. 1, 86 Fed. Rep. 456, MORROW, J., Vol. I, 537, 539 Englebrecht, Clinton vs. See Clinton vs. Englebrecht. English vs. Sailors' Snug Harbor. See Ingles vs. Sailors, &c. Errol, Coe vs. See Coe vs. Errol. Erwin vs. United States. U. uam's Heirs vs. Robouam's Exrs. Ex parte and In re; See names of parties, but see also: Chinese names; Indian names; Extradition, Ex parte; In re generally. Export Тах (War Revenue Cuse). See Fairbank vs. United States, Dooley vs. United States, No. 2. Extradition, Ex parte; In re Baruch; In re Behrendt; In re Breen; In re British Prisoners; In re Cannon; In re Page Carrier; In re Charlestown; In re Cortes; In re Cox; In re Cross; In re De Giacomo; Ex parte Dos Santos; Dow's Case; In re Dugan; In re Ezeta; In re Farez; In re Ferrelle; Ex parte Foss; In re Fowler; In re Heilbronn ; In re Henrich; In re Herris or Herres; Ex parte Hibbs; Ex parte Holmes; In re Kaine; In re Kelley (Peter); In re Kelly; In re Ker (Ker vs. Illinois); In re Kronjaker; Ex parte Lane; Lopez & Sattler's Case; In re Ludwig; Ex parte McCabe ; In re MacDonnell; In re McPhun; In re Metzgar or Metzger; In re Miller; In re Mineau; Muller's Case; In re Neely (Neely vs. Henkel); In re Newman; In re Orpen; In re Palmer; In re Pederson; In re Rahrer; In re Reinitz; In re Risch; In re Roderiguez; Ex parte Ross; In re Roth; In re Rowe.; Ex parte Sternaman; In re Thomas; Ex parte Van Aerman; In re Vandervelpen; Ex parte Van Hoven (2 Cases); In re Veremaitre; In re Wadge; In re Wohl; In re Washburn; In re Weiyand; Wildenhus's Case. Ezeta, In re. U. S. Dist. Ct. Cala. 1894; 62 Fed. Rep. 964 and 972, MORROW, J., Vol. II, 266, 268 Fabrigas, Mostyn vs. See Mostyn vs. Fabrigas. Factory Tobacco, United States VS. See United States vs. Tobacco Factory. Page Fairbank vs. United States. 1, 13, 14, 43, 246 229 Fama, The. High Ct. of Admiralty, 1804; 5 Robinson, 106, SIR WM. SCOTT, Vol. I, 554 Vol. II, 161, 166, 470 Famous Smith VS. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1894; 151 U. S. 50, BROWN, J., Vol. II, Farez, In re. (3 Cases). U.S. Dist. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1869 and 1870; 7 Blatchford, 34, 345, 491, Fed. Cas. 4644, 4645, 4646; BLATCHFORD J., and WOODRUFF, J., Vol. II, Farmers Loan & Trust Co., Pollock vs. See Pollock vs. Farmers L. & T. Co. Fassett Collector, &c., Case. See Conqueror, The. Fellows vs. Blacksmith. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1856. 19 Howard, 366, NELSON, J., Vol. I, 140 Vol. II, 207, 212, 216, 229 Fellows, Blacksmith vs. See Blacksmith vs. Fellows. Fellows vs. Denniston. N. Y. 263 Ct. of Appeals, 1861; 23 Bodley vs. Ferguson. Fichera's Case. U. S. Ct. of 264 550 Field vs. Clark. U. S. Sup. 546 Vol. II, 3, 144, 335, 354, 361 Files, Pollard's Lessee vs. See Pollard's Lessee vs. Files. Finley, Buckner vs. See Buckner vs. Finley. Fong Yue Ting vs. United States (Chinese Exclusion case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1893; 149 U. S. 698, GRAY, J., Vol. I, 16, 28, 55, 139, 141, 190 479, 535, 552, 557, 558, 560 Vol. II, 84, 86, 103, 107, 109, 110 111, 121, 122, 259 Försöket, The. U. S. Dist. Penna. 1801; 1 Peters Adm. Rep. 197, PETERS, J., Vol. II, Ct. 330 Fort Leavenworth R. R. Co. VS. Lowe. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1885; 114 U. S. 525, FIELD, J., Vol. II, Forty-three Gallons of Brandy, In re. U. S. Cir. Ct. Minn. 1882; 11 Fed. Rep. 47, MCCRARY, J. Forty-three Gallons of Whiskey, United States vs. See United States vs. Forty-three &c. Foss, Ex parte. Sup. Ct. 194 268 Cala. 1894; 102 Cala. 347, DEHAVEN, J., Vol. II, Foster, United States vs. See United States vs. Foster. Foster and Elam vs. Neilson. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1829; 2 Peters, 253, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I, 140, 431, 471, 537 544, 553, 554, 555, 558, 560, 567 Vol. II, 63, 66, 67, 79, 84, 106 146, 147, 165, 324, 361 Fourteen Diamond Rings, Pepke Claimant (Insular case). U. S. Sup. Ct., decided Dec. 2, 1901; BROWN, J., Vol. I, 119, 122, 461, 466, 467 563, 573, 576 Fouvergne vs. City of New Orleans. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1855; 18 Howard, 470, CAMPBELL, J., Vol. II, Fowler, In re George. U. S. Dist. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1880; 18 Blatchford, 430, BLATCHford, J., Vol. II, Fox vs. Southack. Sup. Ct. Franklin County Commr's, Frederickson VS. State of 163 264 See 15 41, 52 See Freehold Co. (United States), Vol. II, French Republic vs. Schultze. French Spoliation Claims Cases. 152 Garcia vs. Lee. Ct. 1838; 12 TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. II, Garrison vs. United States. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1895; 30 Ct. of Claims, 272, PEELLE, J., Vol. II, Gay, Thomas vs. See Thomas vs. Gay. 223 Gee Fook Sing vs. United States. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th Cir. 1892; 7 U. S. App. 27, HANDFORD, J., Vol. II, 118 Gee Fook Sing vs. United States. See Lem Hing Dun vs. United States. 111 Gee Hop, In re. U. S. Dist. Ct. Cala. 1895; 71 Fed. Rep. 274, MORROW, J., Vol. II, Gelston vs. Hoyt. N. Y. Ct. of Errors, 1816; 13 Johnson, 561, KENT, Chan., Vol. II, 358 Genessee Chief, The. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1851; 12 Howard, 443, TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. I, 541, 545 Geofroy vs. Riggs. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1890; 133 U. S. 258, FIELD, J., Vol. I, 190, 493, 540, 552, 553 |