Page 131 (Chinese Laundry Case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1885; 113 U. S. 703, FIELD, J., Vol. II, Soulard vs. United States (Smith vs. United States). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1830; 4 Peters, 511, MARSHALL, Ch. J., and 1836, 10 Peters, 100 and 326, BALDWIN, J., Vol. I, 538, 554, 559 Vol. II, 147, 165, 178 Southack, Fox vs. See Fox vs. Southack. South Carolina Dispensary Case. See Cantini vs. Tillman. South Carolina, State of, vs. Smith. See State (So. Car.) vs. Smith. Southern Kansas Ry. Co., Cherokee Nation vs. See Cherokee Nation vs. Southern Kansas Ry. Co. Spark, Steamer vs. Lee Choi Chum. See Steamer Spark Spies vs. Illinois (Chicago 543 549, 556, 557 55, 56 Vol. II, Spoliation Claims. See French Spoliation Cases. Sprague vs. Thompson. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1e86; 118 U. S. 90, MATTHEWS, J., Vol. I, Sprague, Brown vs. See Brown vs. Sprague. Springville vs. Thomas. U. 548 S. Sup. Ct. 1897; 166 U. S. 707, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. I, 539 Spybuck, Summers vs. See Summers vs. Spybuck. Star, The Ship. See Ship Star, State Board of Health, Com- See VS. State Board of Health. State of Arkansas, Beers VS. See Beers vs. State of Arkan sas. 167 221 Page State of Arkansas, Wilburn vs. See Wilburn vs. State of Arkansas. State of California, Almy vs. See Almy vs. California. State of California, Hurtado vs. See Hurtado vs. California. State of California, McCall vs. See McCall vs. California. State of California, People of, vs. Gerke. See People vs. Gerke. State of California, People of, vs. Naglee. See People vs. Naglee. State of California, People of, vs. Washington. See Peo 11 ple (Cala.) vs. Washington. State of Georgia vs. Brailsford. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1794; 3 Dallas, 1, JAY, Ch. J., (and other justices), Vol. II, State of Georgia vs. Stanton. See Georgia vs. Stanton. State of Georgia, Cherokee Nation vs. See Cherokee Nation vs. State of Georgia. State of Georgia, Chisholm vs. See Chisholm vs. Georgia. State of Georgia, Lascelles vs. See Lascelles vs. Georgia. State of Georgia, Worcester vs. See Worcester vs. Georgia. State of Illinois, Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. vs. See Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. vs. Illinois. State of Illinois, Ker vs. See Ker vs. State of Illinois. State of Illinois, Moore vs. See Moore vs. Illinois. State of Illinois, Munn vs. See Munn vs. Illinois. State of Illinois, Spies vs. Spies vs. Illinois. State (Iowa) vs. Ross and Mann. Sup. Ct. Iowa, 1866; 21 Iowa, 467, WRIGHT, J., Vol. II, 278 State of Iowa, Miner's Bank vs. See Miner's Bank vs. Iowa. State of Iowa, Rhodes vs. See Rhodes vs. Iowa. See VS. State of Massachusetts, Thurlow State of Minnesota vs. Camp bell. Sup. Ct. Minn. 1893; 53 Minn. 354, MITCHELL, J., Vol. II, State of Missouri vs. Andriano, See Missouri vs. Andriano. State of Missouri, Brooks vs. See Brooks vs. Missouri. State of Missouri, Cummings vs. See Cummings vs. Missouri. State of Missouri, Emert vs. See Emert vs. Missouri. State of Missouri vs. Lewis, See Missouri vs. Lewis. State of Nebraska, Boyd vs. See Boyd vs. Nebraska. State of Nevada, Crandall vs. See Crandall vs. Nerada. State of New Hampshire vs. 229 230 Page Louisiana. See New Hamp- State of New York vs. Louis- State of New York, People &c. vs. Curtis. See People (N. Y.) &c., vs. Curtis. State of New York, (People of) vs. McLeod. See People (N. Y.) vs. McLeod. State of New York, People &c. vs. Stout. See People (N. Y.) &c., vs. Stout. State of New York, People of vs. Warren. See People (N. Y.) vs. Warren. 214 State (North Dakota) ex rel. Tompton vs. Donoyer. Sup. Ct. N. Dak. 1897; 6 No. Dak. 586, BARTHOLOMEW, J., Vol. II, State (Ohio) vs. Vanderpool. Sup. Ct. Ohio, 1883; 39 Ohio, 273, JOHNSON, Ch. J., Vol. II, 271 274 State of Oregon, Lane vs. See Lane vs. Oregon. State of Penna. vs. Wheeling Bridge Co. See Pennsyl State of Penna., Bell's Gap R. R. Co. vs. See Bell's Gap R. R. Prigg vs. Pennsylvania. State of Rhode Island vs. Massachusetts. See Rhode Island vs. Massachusetts. Texas vs. White. VS. See See 278 278 State of Texas, Asher vs. Asher vs. Texas. State (Texas), Blandford vs. See Blandford vs. State. State of Texas, United States See United States vs. Texas (two cases). State of Texas, White vs. White vs. Texas. State of Utah, Thompson vs. See Thompson vs. Utah. State of Vermont vs. Brewster. Sup. Ct. Vermont, 1835; 7 Vt. 118, Phelps, J., Vol. II, State of Vermont vs. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel. U. S. Cir. Ct. Vermont, Fed. Cas. 16919 and 16920, 1826, THOMPSON, J., Vol. II, State of Vermont, O'Neill vs. See O'Neill vs. Vermont. State of Virginia, Cohens vs. See Cohens vs. Virginia. Steamboat Company Livingston. New York Ct. of Errors, 1825;3 Cowen, 713, SANDFORD Chan., Vol. I, Steamer Spark vs. Lee Choi Chum. U. S. Cir. Ct. Cal. 1 Sawyer, 713, Sawyer, J., VS. Vol. II, Steamship &c. Companies. Compagnie Francaise vs. State Board of Health. Huus vs. N. Y. & Porto Rico S. S. Co. Liverpool &c. Stm. Co. VS. Phoenix Ins. Co. Monongahela Nav. Co. vs. United 12 549 342 Page States. Morgan S. S. Co. vs. Stearns vs. United States. Steele Co. (Illinois), Budzisz 202 tion. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1899; 174 U. S. 445, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. II, Sternaman vs. Peck. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1897; 80 Fed. Rep. 883, WALLACE, J., affirming Ex parte Sternaman. U. S. Dist. Ct. N. D. N. Y. 1896; 77 Fed. Rep. 595, COXE, J., reargument denied, 83 Fed. Rep. 690, Vol. II, 267 Sternaman, Ex parte. Sternaman vs. Peck. See 298 Stewart vs. Callaghan. U. S. Cir. Ct. Dist. of Col. 1835; 4 Cranch, C. C. 594, PER CURIAM, Vol. II, Stimpson, Philadelphia & Trenton R. R. Co. vs. See Philadelphia & Trenton R. R. Co. vs. Stimpson. Stoutenbergh vs. Hennick. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1889; 129 U.S. 141, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. I, 547, 583 Stout, People N. Y. ex rel. Young vs. See People (N. Y.) &c. vs. Stout. Strader vs. Graham. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1850; 10 Howard, 98, TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. I, 539 Strike Cases. See In re Debs. Strother vs. Lucas. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1832; 6 Peters, 763, THOMPSON, J., Vol. I, 538, 539 553, 554, 559 U. S. Sup. Ct. 1819; 4 Wheaton, 122, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I, Sturges vs. The Collector &c. 225 541 549 Swan, The. U. S. Dist. Ct. States vs. See United States 549 124 U. S. 438, BREWER, J., Taltan vs. Mayes. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1896; 163 U. S. 376, Vol. II, 562 221, 231 Tamerling vs. U. S. Freehold and Emigration Co. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1876; 93 U. S. 644, DAVIS, J., Vol. II, Tampico Duty Case. See Fleming vs. Page. 185 34 Taylor vs. Brown. U. S. Sup. Tax Cases. See License Tax ard vs. Taylor. See Shep 448 Tennessee vs. Davis. U. S. Tennessee, Coleman vs. Tennessee. Tennessee, Henderson vs. See Henderson vs. Tennessee. Tennessee, State of, Van Brocklin vs. See Van Brocklin vs. Tennessee. Territory of Arizona, Marsh vs. See Marsh vs. Arizona. Texas vs. White. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1868; 7 Wallace, 700, CHASE, Ch. J., Vol. I, 250, 537 541, 543, 557 Texas, State of, Asher vs. See Asher vs. Texas. Texas, State of, Blandford vs. See Blandford vs. State. Texas, United States vs. See 219 VS. See Boyd vs. Nebraska. Thebo vs. Choctaw Tribe of Indians. U. S. Cir. Ct. Appeals, 8th Cir. 1895; 66 Fed. Rep. 372, CALDWELL, J., Vol. II, Thingvalla Line vs. United States. U. S. Ct. Claims, 1889; 24 Ct. Clms. 255, RICHARDSON, Ch. J., Vol. II, 77, 301 Thirty Hogsheads of Sugar vs. Boyle. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1815; 9 Cranch, 191, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I, 498, 551 557 Thomas vs. Gay. U. S. Sup. 264, 539, 547 86, 221 267 Thomas vs. United States. See See 539, 545 550, 556 Page Bales of Cotton. See Am. Thurlow vs. Massachusetts. See Tiburcio Parrott, In re. See Parrott, In re Tiburcio. Tillman, Cantini vs. See Cantini vs. Tillman. Tingy, Bas vs. See Bas vs. Tingy. See Titusville, Brennan vs. Brennan vs. Titusville. Tobacco Factory, United States VS. See United States vs. Tobacco Factory. Tobin vs. Wilkinshaw (three cases). U. S. Cir. Ct. Cala. 1855 and 1856; 1 McAllister, 26, 151, 186; Fed. Cas. 14,068-69-70, MCALLISTER, J., Vol. II, Tompkins, Chicago, Mil. &c. R. R. Co. vs. See Chicago, Mil. &c. R. R. Co. vs. Tompkins. Tompton, State &c. vs. Donoyer. See State (Nor. Dak.) vs. Donoyer. Tom Yum, In re. U S. Dist. Ct. Cala. 1894; 64 Fed. Rep. 485, MORROW, J., Vol. II, Toombs, Hornbuckle vs. See Hornbuckle vs. Toombs. Topeka, Loan Ass'n vs. See Loan Ass'n vs. Topeka. Tory Rent Case. See Rutgers vs. Waddington. Town vs. De Haven. U. S. 179 119 Cir. Ct. Oregon, 1878; 5 Sawyer, 146; Fed. Cas. 14,113, SAWYER, J., Vol. II, 83, 168 Town of New Haven, Society for the Propagation of the Gospel vs. See Society &c. vs. Town of New Haven. Town of Titusville, Brennan vs. See Brennan vs. Titusville. Toy Long, Chapman vs. See Chapman vs. Toy Long. Trade Mark Cases. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1879; 100 U. S. 82, MILLER, J., Vol. II, 244, 324, 326 Traffic Ass'n, Joint, United States vs. See United States vs. Joint Traffic Ass'n. Treasurer of Louisiana Poydras VS. See Poydras vs. Treasurer of Louisiana. Truscott vs. Hurlburt L. &c. Co. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th |