individual cases.

Vol. I, 28, 60 62, 71, 117 to 127, 190, 443, 444 Insular Cases Appendix, Vol. I, 459 to end of Vol. I. Vol. II, 4, 24, 67, 124, 129, 138 149, 153, 165, 166, 167, 171 178, 180, 283 Insular Cases. See Armstrong VS. United States (Porto Rico); Crossman VS. United States (Hawaii); De Lima VS. Bidwell (Porto Rico & New York Dingley Act); Dooley, Smith & Co. vs. United States (Porto Rico War Tariff); Dooley, Smith & Co. vs. United States (Porto Rico Foraker Act); Downes vs. Bidwell (Porto Rico and New York Foraker Act); Fourteen Diamond Rings, Pepke Claimant (Philippine Cuse); Goetze vs. United States (Porto Rico and N. Y. Dingley Act;) Huus vs. N. Y. & Porto Rico S. S. Co. (Porto Rico Pilotage Case).

Insurance Co. VS. Brame.

U. S. Sup. Ct. 1877; 95 U. S.
754, HUNT, J., Vol. I,
Ins. Co., Am., Canter vs. See
American Ins. Co. vs. Canter.
Ins. Co., Great Western, Uni-
ted States vs. See Great
Western Ins. Co. vs. United
States.

Ins. Co., Albany County, Whiton
VS. See Whiton vs. Albany
County Ins. Co.

Ins. Co., New York, Varet vs.
See Varet vs. N. Y. Ins. Co.
Ins. Co., The Phoenix, Liver-

pool Steam Co. vs. See Liver-
pool Steam Co. vs. Phoenix
Ins. Co.

Ins. Co. (New York), Roulet vs.
See New York Ins. Co. vs.
Roulet.

Ins. Co., Nor. West. Life Co.,
Shepard vs. See Shepard vs.
Nor. West. L. I. Co.

Ins. Co. Suffolk, Williams, vs.
See Williams vs. Suffolk, Ins.
Co.
Interstate Commerce Comm.
vs. Brimson. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1894; 154 U. S. 447, HARLAN,

155

In the Matter of. See In re.
Iowa, Miner's Bank vs. See
Miner's Bank vs. Iowa.
Iowa, Rhodes vs. See Rhodes
vs. lowa.

Iowa (State of) vs. Ross and
Mann. See State of Iowa vs.
Ross and Mann.

Isabella, The Amiable. See
Amiable Isabella, The.
Isham, United States vs. See
United States vs. Isham.
Itata, The. U. S. Cir. Ct. App.
1893, 56 Fed. Rep. 505, HAW-
LEY and HANFORD, JJ.
Vol. II,

Jack, In re Captain. See Captain Jack, In re.

Jackson vs. Beach. N. Y.

Sup. Ct. 1800; 1 Johns. Cas. 399, PER CURIAM, Vol. II, Jackson, Black vs. See Black

See Car

359

38

17

vs. Jackson. Jackson, Carver vs. ver vs. Jackson. Jackson vs. Clark, U. S. Sup. Ct. 1818; 3 Wheaton, 1, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. II, Jackson vs. Decker. N. Y. Sup. Ct. 1814; 11 Johns. (N. Y.) 418, SPENCER, J., Vol. II, 37 Jackson vs. Lunn. N. Y. Sup. Ct. 1802; 3 Johns. Cas. 109, KENT, J., Vol. II, Jackson vs. Porter. U. S. Cir. Ct. N. Y. 1825; 1 Paine, 457, THOMPSON, J., Vol. II, Jackson vs Wright. N. Y. Sup. Ct. 1809; 4 Johns. Cas. 75, VAN NESS, J., Vol. II, James G. Swan, The, United

37, 38

States vs. See United States vs. The James G. Swan. Jamieson, Hooe vs. See Hooe vs. Jamieson.

Jane, The Ship. See Ship Jane, The.

Janis vs. United States. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1897; 32 Ct. of Clms. 407, NOTT, Ch. J., Vol. II, Jansen, Talbot vs. See Talbot vs. Jansen.

Jecker vs. Magee.

Same as

Haver vs. Yaker. Jecker vs. Montgomery. U.

207

37

223

I,

Vol. II,

Johnson vs. McIntosh. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1823; 8 Wheaton, 543, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. 478, 538, 541, 562 35, 121, 173 195, 204, 206, 207, 209, 210 Johnston, United States vs. See United States vs. Johnston. Joint Traffic Ass'n, United States vs. See United States

vs. Joint Traffic Ass'n.
Jones vs. McMaster. U. S.

Sup. Ct. 1857; 20 Howard, 8,
NELSON, J., Vol. II,
Jones vs. Meehan. U. S. Sup.

Ct. 1899; 175 U. S. 1, GRAY,
J., affirming Meehan VS.
Jones, U. S. Cir. Ct. Minn.
79 Fed. Rep. 997, NELSON, J.,
see also 70 Fed. Rep. 453,
Vol. II,
Jones, Morrill vs. See Morrill
vs. Jones.

Jones, Scott vs. See Scott vs.
Jones.

Jones VS. United

168

215

States. (Navassa Islands Case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1890; 137 U. S. 202, GRAY, J., Vol. I, 5, 15, 55, 60, 61, 78, 80, 140 536, 538, 544, 552 216, 358, 361 U. S. Cir.

Vol. II,

Jones vs. Walker.

Ct. Virginia, 1803; 2 Paine,
688, JAY, Ch. J., Vol. II,
13, 136

Jordan vs. Goldman. Dist.
Ct. Oklahoma, 1891; 1
Okla. Rep. 406, GREEN, J.,
Vol. II,
Jordan vs. Williams. U. S.
Cir. Ct. Mass. 1851; 1 Curtis
69, Fed. Cas. 7528, CURTIS, J.,
Vol. II,
Joseph, United States vs. See
United States vs. Joseph.
Josephs vs. United States.

U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1865; 1
Ct. of Clms. 197, Norт, Ch.
J., Vol. II,
Jost vs. Jost. Sup. Ct. Dist.

221

333

155

States. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1893; 28 Ct. of Clms. 281, NOTT, J., Vol. II,

Joy, Holden vs. See Holden vs. Joy.

Joy, Warner vs. Same as Holden vs. Joy.

Judson vs. Corcoran. U. S.

221

221

540

223

Kendall vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1838; 12
Peters, 524, THOMPSON, J.,
Vol. I,
Kendall vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1868; 7 Wal-
lace, 113, MILLER, J., affirm-
ing same case, 1865, 1 U. S.
Ct. of Clms. 261, PECK, J.,
Vol. II,
Kennard vs. Louisiana. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1875; 92 U. S. 480,
WAITE, Ch. J., Vol. I, 540, 546
Kennett vs. Chambers. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1852; 14 Howard, 38,
TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. I, 536, 544
Vol. II,
358, 361
Kennett, Bryan vs. See Bryan
vs. Kennett.

Kennett's Petition. N. H.

Sup. Ct. 1851; 24 N. H. 139,
BELL, J., Vol. I,
Kenney, Phila. & Reading R. R.

Co. vs. See Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. vs. Kenney. Kentucky, Bank of, Briscoe vs. See Briscoe vs. Bank of Kentucky.

Kentucky, Commonwealth of,

Hawes vs. See Hawes vs.
Commonwealth.

474

Kentucky, Crutcher vs. See Crutcher vs. Kentucky. Ker vs. State of Illinois. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1886; 119 U. S. 436, MILLER, J., affirming Ex parte Ker. U. S. Cir. Ct. Ill. 1883; 18 Fed. Rep. 167, DRUMMOND, J., Vol. II, 268 276, 279 Kerr, Gordon vs. See Gordon vs. Kerr. Key, Frelinghuysen vs. See Frelinghuysen vs. Key.

536, 542

548

Pollard's Heirs vs. Kibbe. Kilbourn vs. Thompson. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1880; 103 U. S. 168, MILLER, J., Vol. I, King vs. Parks. N. Y. Sup. Ct. 1822; 19 Johns. 375, SPENCER, Ch. J., Vol. I, King & Coxe, United States vs. See United States vs. King & Coxe. Kinkead vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1893; 150 U. S. 483, BROWN, J., affirming same case, Court of Claims, 1883; 18 Ct. of Clms. 304, DRAKE, Ch. J., and 24 Ct. of Claims, 459, SCOFIELD, J., Vol. II, 157, 301 Knight VS. United States Land Ass'n. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 142 U. S. 161, LAMAR, J., Vol. II, Knight, United States vs. See United States vs. Knight. Knowlton vs. Moore (War Revenue inheritance tax case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1900; 178 U. S. 41, WHITE, J., Vol. I, 477, 478, 491, 540, 546, 580 Knox vs. Lee (Legal Tender case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1870; 12 Wallace, 457, STRONG and BRADLEY, JJ., Vol. I, 54, 62, 536 Kreplin, The Elwine. See Elwine Kreplin, The. Krojanker, In re. U. S. Cir. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1890; 40 Fed. Rep. 482, LACOMBE, J., Vol. II,

Kull vs. Kull. N. Y. Sup. Ct.

158

264

38

Gen'l Term, 1885; 37 Hun,
476, DAVIS, J., Vol. II,
La Abra Silver Mng. Co. vs.
United States. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1899; 175 U. S. 423, HAR-
LAN, J., Vol. I, 553, 555, 559, 560
Vol. II,
86, 302, 309
La Abra and Weil Cases. See
Frelinghuysen vs. Key.
Labadi vs. United States.
U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1896; 31
Ct. of Clms. 205, WELDON, J.,
Vol. II,

La Chapelle, United States vs.
See United States vs. La
Chapelle.

UN

223

264

Lane, Ex parte. U. S. Dist.
Ct. Mich. 1881; 6 Fed. Rep.
34, BROWN, J., Vol. II,
Lane vs. Oregon. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1868; 7 Wallace, 71,
CHASE, Ch. J., Vol. II,
264, 536, 542
Langdeau vs. Hanes. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1874; 21 Wallace, 521
FIELD, J., Vol. II, 194
La Ninfa, The. U. S. Dist.
Ct. Alaska, 1891; 49 Fed.
Rep. 575, BUGBEE, J., and
U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th Cir.
1896; 75 Fed. Rep. 513, HAW-
LEY, J., Vol. II,
La Republic Francaise VS.
Schultz. See Republic Fran-
caise vs. Schultz.

38, 83

Lark and Cargo, The. U. S.

548

Cir. Ct. Mass. 1812; 1 Gallison, 55, STORY, J., Vol. I, Lascelles vs. Bidwell. U. S. Cir. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1900; 102 Fed. Rep. 1004, LACOMBE, J., Vol. I, 121, 545, 547 Lascelles vs. Georgia. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1893; 148 U. S. 537, JACKSON, J., Vol. II, Lattimer vs. Poteet. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1840; 14 Peters, 4, MCLEAN, J., Vol. II, 214, 349

404

Lee.

Lee, United States vs. See United States vs. Lee. Legal Tender Cases. Cited collectively, Vol. I, 536, 549, 551 Legal Tender Cases. See Hepburn vs. Griswold. Juilliard vs. Greenman. Knox vs. Lee.

Leghorn Seizures, The. U.
S. Ct. of Claims, 1892; 27 Ct.
of Clms. 224, NOTT, J.,
Vol. II,
Leighton vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1894; 161 U.
S. 291, BREWER, J., affirining
U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1894; 29
Ct. of Clms. 288, PEELLE, J.,
Vol. II,
Leitensdorfer vs. Webb. U.S.
Sup. Ct. 1857; 20 Howard,
176, DANIEL, J., Vol. I,

Vol. II,

284

223

539, 545, 551,

538 554 161

Le Louis, The. High Ct. Admr. 1817; 2 Dodson Admr. 210, SIR WILLIAM SCOTT, Vol. II,

329

118

Lem Hing Dun vs. United States. U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9 Cir. 1892; 7 U. S. App. 31, HANDFORD, J., (also Gee Fook Sing vs. United States. 7 U. S. App. 27) Vol. II, Lem Moon Sing vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1895; 158 U. S. 538, HARLAN, J., Vol. I, 28, 479, 555 Vol. II. 107, 109, 110, 259 Leon XIII, The. Ct. of Appeal (English) 1883; 8 Probate Div. 121, Brett, M. R. Vol. II,

330

292, 297

Leonard vs. Nye. Sup. Ct.
Mass. 1878; 125 Mass. 455,
GRAY, Ch. J., Vol. II,
Leong Yick Dew, In re. U.
S. Cir. Ct. Cala. 1884; 10
Sawyer, 38, SAWYER, J.,
Vol. II,

Lessee of Coxe, McIlvaine vs.
See McIlvaine VS. Coxe's
Lessee.

Lessee of Dawson, Godfrey vs. See Dawson's Lessee vs. Godfrey.

Lessee of Norwood, Owings vs.
See Owings vs.
Norwood's
Lessee.
Lessee of Pollard vs. Files.
See Pollard's Lessee vs. Files.
Lessee of Winton, Cornet vs.
See Cornet vs. Winton's Les-
see.

Lewis vs. Bell. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1854; 17 Howard, 616,
GRIER, J., Vol. II,

Lewis vs. Hawaii &c.

116

297

Sup.

Ct. Hawaii, 1899; 12 Hawaii,

27, FREAR, J., Vol. I, Lewis, Missouri vs. Missouri

vs. Lewis.

Lew Jim vs. United States.

U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th Cir. 1895; 29 U. S. App. 513, McKENNA, J., Vol. II,

Libby vs. Clark. U. S. Sup.

Ct. 1886; 118 U. S. 250, MILLER, J., Vol. II, License Cases. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1847; sub nomine, Thurlow vs. Massachusetts (p. 504), Fletcher vs. Rhode Island (p. 540) and Pierce vs. New Hampshire (p. 554), 5 How. 504-633, TANEY, Ch. J., McLEAN, CATRON, DANIEL, WOODBURY, GRIER, JJ., Vol. II,

See

220

119

217

349

223

License Tax Cases, The. U.
S. Sup. Ct. 1866; 5 Wallace,
462, CHASE, Ch. J., Vol. I, 546
Life Ins. Co., Nor. West, Shep-
ard vs. See Shepard vs. Nor.
West Life Ins. Co.
Light, The Ambrose vs.
Ambrose Light, The.
Litchfield vs. United States.
U. S. Ct. of Clms. 1898; 33
Ct. of Clms. 203, PEELLE, J.,
Vol. II,
Lithographic Co. vs. Sarony.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1884; 111 Ŭ.
S. 53, MILLER, J., Vol. I,
Liverpool Hero, The. U. S.
Cir. Ct. Mass. 1814; 2 GAL-
LISON, 184, STORY, J., Vol. I, 551
Liverpool &c. Steamship
Co. vs. Phoenix Ins. Co.
U. S. Sup. Ct., 1889; 129 U.
S. 397, GRAY, J., Vol. II, 189
Livingston vs. Moore. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1833; 7 Peters, 469,
JOHNSON, J., Vol. I, 536, 542
Livingston, Steamboat Co. vs.
See Steamboat Co. vs. Liv-
ingston.