...Exch. 8. reasonable rule, viz., that, in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury there is a preliminary question for the Judge, not whether...producing it, upon -whom the onus of proof is imposed. If, therefore, the plaintiffs' evidence in this case was such that the Judge ought to have considered that...

...question for the Judge, not whether there is literally any evidence, but whether there is any evidence upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the onut of proof is imposed. Plaintiff himself contributed to the loss of the Debentures. The Court, however,...

...question for the judge, not whether there is literally no * 14 Wallace, 448. Opinion of the court. evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury...producing it, upon whom the onus of proof is imposed. The English cases there cited fully sustain the proposition,* and the decisions of this court have...

...Eep. there is a preliminary question for the jndge, not whether there is literally no evidence, hut whether there is any upon which a jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the porty producing it, upon whom the onus of proof ia imposed. If, therefore, the plaintiff's evidence...

...every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary question for the jndge, not whether there is literally no evidence, but whether...proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it." Miller, J., in Improvement Co. v. 3f tmooii, 14 Wall. 442, 448 ; Commissioners v. Clark, 94 US 278,...

...authority have established the rule that in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary question for the judge, not whether...evidence, but whether there is any upon which a jury cau properly proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the emu* of proof is imposed....

...reasonable rule, to wit, that before the evidence is left to the jury, there is or may be in every case a preliminary question for the judge, not whether...literally no evidence, but whether there is any upon which n jury can properly proceed to find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the burden of proof...

...evidence is left to the jury, there may be in every case, a preliminary question for the presiding judge, not whether there is literally no evidence,...whether there is any upon which a jury can properly find a verdict for the party producing it, upon whom the burden of proof is imposed. Cotton v. Wood,...

...reasonable rule, to wit, that in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is or may be a preliminary question for the judge, not whether...producing it, upon whom the onus of proof is imposed. J Apply that rule to the present case and it is clear to a demonstration that the ruling was correct,...

...a more reasonable rule, viz., that in every case, before the evidence is left to the jury, there is a preliminary question for the judge, not whether...party producing it, upon whom the onus of proof is imposed."2 It remains to add, that where the judge misconceives his duty, and presents the question...