 | 1896 - 866 страници
...NEGLIGENCE — CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE. —Contributory negligence is never a question of law unless the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same inference therefrom. ( Eichhorn v. Missouri. K. & T. Ry. Co., [Mo.] 32 3. W. Rep. 993.) RAILROAD COMPANIES... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1894 - 588 страници
...question as to whether there was negligence or not, the determination of the matter is for the jury. It is only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them that the question of negligence is ever considered as one of law for the court.... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1904 - 636 страници
...question as to whether there was negligence or not, the determination of the matter is for the jury. It is only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them that the question of negligence is ever considered as one of law for the court.... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1899 - 602 страници
...case. Before the question * * * becomes a law for the court, the facts shown by the evidence must be such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusions from them." Dedericks v. Ry. Co., 13 Utah 34; Railway Co. v. lues, 114 US 408; Railroad Co. v. Converse, 139 US... | |
 | 1894 - 2096 страници
...question as to whether there was negligence or not, the determination of the matter is for the jury. It is only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them that the question of negligence Is ever considered as one of law for the court."... | |
 | 1899 - 2058 страници
...as said by the court in a subsequent ease: 'The question of negligence is one of law for the court only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them; or, in other words, a case should not be withdrawn from the jury unless the conclusion... | |
 | 1905 - 1104 страници
...question as to whether there was negligence or not, the determination of the matter is for the jury ; but where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them, the question of negligence is one of law for the court." Upon the undisputed... | |
 | 1907 - 2094 страници
...whether there was negligence or not, the determination of the mutter is for the jury. It is only whore the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them, that the question of negligence is ever considered as one of law for the court."... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1896 - 1242 страници
...question as to whether there was negligence or not, the determination of the matter Is for the jury. It Is only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them that the question of negligence Is ever considered as one of law for the courts."... | |
| |
It is only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them that the question of negligence is ever considered as one of law for the court. 
