Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub

savages.

Maldonata, alone and without sustenance, was forced to quit a cavern which was an object of terror to so many living creatures, but which her pity had made a place of safety for her. She now felt with sorrow the want of a society, that had been of such signal service to her; she did not wander for any considerable time, before she fell into the hands of the She had been fed by a lioness, and was made a slave by men. She was soon after retaken by the Spaniards, who brought her back to Buenos Ayres. The Commandant, more savage than the lions or the wild Indians, did not think her sufficiently punished for her flight by all the dangers and miseries she had endured: he had the cruelty to order her to be tied to a tree in the middle of a wood, and there left to starve, or to be devoured by wild beasts.

Two days after, some soldiers went to see what was become of the unhappy victim. They found her alive, surrounded with hungry tigers, who were eager to devour her, but were kept at a distance by a lioness who lay at her feet with her whelps. The sight struck the soldiers motionless with pity and terror. When the lioness saw them, she withdrew from the tree, as if to make room for them to unbind her benefactress: but when they took her away, the animal followed slowly at some distance, endeavouring to confirm, by her caresses and complaints, the wonders of gratitude which the woman was relating to her deliverers. The lioness with her whelps for some time followed her footsteps, shewing all the same marks of regret and affliction, that a disconsolate family express when they attend a beloved father or son, who is going to embark for America, from whence he may never return.

The Commandant was informed of the whole adventure by his soldiers; and this example of gratitude in an animal so ferocious awakened in him those feelings which his savage heart had undoubtedly lost in crossing the seas, and he suffered a woman to live, who had been so visibly protected by Heaven.

NO SPECTRE.

Monsieur de Conange, on a wandering excursion which he was making with a friend through one of the French provinces, found it necessary one night to take refuge from a storm, in an inn which had little else to recommend it, but that the host was well known to M. de Conange. This man had all the inclination in the world to accommodate the travellers to their satisfaction, but unfortunately he possessed not the power. The situation was desolate, and the few chambers the house contained were already occupied by other travellers. There remained unengaged only a single parlour on the ground floor, with a closet adjoining, with which, inconvenient as they were, M. de Conange and his friend were obliged to content themselves. The closet was provided with a very uninviting bed for the latter, while they supped together in the parlour, where it was decided that M. de Conange was to sleep. As they purposed departing very early in the morning, they soon retired to their separate beds, and ere long fell into profound sleep. Short, however, had been M. de Conange's repose, when he was disturbed by the voice of his fellow traveller, crying out that something was strangling him. Though he heard his friend speak to him, he could not for some time sufficiently rouse himself from his drowsiness, to awaken to a full sense of the words his friend had uttered. That it was a voice of distress, he now perfectly understood, and he called anxiously to inquire what was the matter; no answer was

returned, no sound was heard, all was still as death. Now seriously alarmed, M. de Conange threw himself out of bed, and taking up his candle, proceeded to the closet. What was his horror and astonishment, when he beheld his friend lying senseless beneath the strangling grasp of a dead man, loaded with chains. The cries of distress, which this dreadful sight called forth, soon brought the host to his assistance, whose fear and astonishment acquitted him of being in any way an actor in the tragic scene before them. It was, however, a more pressing duty to endeavour to recover the senseless traveller, than to unravel the mysterious event which had reduced him to that state. The barber of the village was therefore immediately sent for, and in the meantime, they extricated the traveller from the grasp of the man, whose hand had in death fastened on his throat with a force which rendered it difficult to unclench. While performing this, they happily ascertained that the vital spark still faintly glowed in the heart of the traveller, although wholly fled from that of his assaulter. The operation of bleeding, which the barber now arrived to perform, gave that spark new vigour, and he was shortly after put to bed out of danger, and left to all that could be of service to him-repose.

M. de Conange then felt himself at liberty to satisfy his curiosity, in developing the mystery of this strange adventure, which was quickly effected by his host. This man informed him that the deceased was his groom, who had within a few days exhibited strong proofs of mental derangement, as to render it absolutely necessary to use coercive measures, to prevent his either doing mischief to himself or others, and that he had in consequence been confined or chained in the stables; but that it was evident his fetters had proved too weak to resist the strength of frenzy, and that in liberating himself, he had passed through a little door, imprudently left unlocked, which led from the saddle room into the closet in which the traveller slept, and had entered it to die with such frightful effects on his bed.

When in the course of a few days, M. de Conange's friend was able to converse, he acknowledged that never in his life had he suffered so much, and that he was confident had he not fainted, madness must have been the consequence of a prolonged state of terror.

DEATH OF MARINO FALIERI, DOGE OF VENICE.

The circumstances related in the following narrative, from Sismondi's History of the Italian Republics, are said to have furnished the materials of Lord Byron's tragedy. Marino Falieri, elected doge of Venice, in 1354, a man of seventy-six years of age, was married to a young and beautiful woman, of whom he was extravagantly jealous. His suspicions were particularly excited by Michael Steno, one of the chiefs of the forty, or criminal tribunal, whose attentions were, however, directed, not to the wife of the doge, but one of the ladies of her household. At a public festival, on the last day of the Carnival, Falieri, having observed some indecorum in the manners of this lady and Steno towards each other, ordered the latter to leave the assembly. Irritated at this command, Steno, following the first impulse of indignation, inscribed on the ducal throne, in an adjoining apartment, two lines, reflecting upon the honour of the doge and the fidelity of his wife. To a man of Falieri's jealous disposition this was an insult of the most deadly nature. He recognized Steno as its author, and making his complaint to the Avogadors, denounced the offender before them. He expected the Council of Ten to

avenge his injury with exemplary severity; but the Avogadors, instead of appealing to that tribunal, referred the cause to the forty themselves, of whom Steno was president. The impulse of resentment, the excitement of a festival, the licence authorized by a mask, which the culprit wore at the time— all these circumstances were considered as extenuations of his fault, and Steno was only condemned to a month's imprisonment. The doge, more irritated by this indulgence than by the original affront, extended his hatred and desire of vengeance, not only to the forty, who had so slightly chastised the offender, but to the whole order of nobility, who had evinced so little interest in his cause. There always prevailed amongst the people of Venice a secret feeling of enmity towards that nobility, which had deprived the nation of its rights, and gained exclusive possession of the sovereignty. The animosity was redoubled by the insolence of some young patricians. They availed themselves of the impunity afforded them by powerful friends, to dishonour the family of the citizens, by the seduction of their wives and daughters, and to insult the fathers and brothers whom they had thus injured. Israel Bertuccio, a plebeian, the chief of the arsenal, had received an affront of this nature. He carried to the doge his complaints against a gentleman of the house of Barbaro. Falieri, with many expressions of unavailing compassion, assured him that he never would obtain justice. "Have not I too," said he, "received a similar insult, and has not the pretended punishment of the offender only added to my dishonour and that of the ducal coronet?" These judicial accusations were soon succeeded by projects of vengeance. Bertuccio introduced the principal malcontents to the doge; they held meetings for many successive nights in his presence, and in the ducal palace; and fifteen plebeians pledged themselves, with Falieri, to overthrow the government. The conspirators agreed that each of them should gain over forty friends, and hold them in readiness for action on the night of the 15th of April, 1355. But in order to ensure secrecy, it was resolved only to tell their associates that their assistance was required, to surprise and punish, by order of the government, the young noblemen, whose profligacy had excited the indignation of the people. The alarm bell of St. Mark's, which could only be rung by order of the doge, was to be the signal for action.

The citizens, however, were to admit no associates but citizens distinguished by their hatred of the nobility, in order to secure the preservation of the secret which was thus partially confided to them. At the moment when the alarmbell sounded, they were to spread a rumour, that the Genoese fleet was before the city; to direct their course simultaneously towards St. Mark's Place, to make themselves masters of its avenues, and to massacre all the patricians as they should arrive to the assistance of the senate. All the preparations were completed, and the secret conspiracy had been faithfully kept till the evening before its execution, when a furrier, named Bertrand, who had been chosen as one of the leaders to conduct his forty associates, learned some details respecting the conduct required of him, which did not seem to accord with the supposed orders of the government. He immediately disclosed to Nicholas Lioni, one of the Council of Ten, the conspiracy in which he had been thus unconsciously involved. Neither the one nor the other suspected the doge to be at the head of the enterprise, and both instantly repaired to his presence to make the disclosure. Falieri had neither the resolution nor the presence of mind necessary to avoid betraying himself; he alternately expressed his doubts of the circumstances disclosed to him, and declared himself fully acquainted with them, and prepared for the result. This inconsistency excited

the suspicions of Lioni; he quitted the doge, to oonsult the Council of Ten, and before them the list of the conspirators, with which Bertrand had furnished him. All were arrested in their houses by order of council. Guards were posted in the city, at the belfries, and at the tower of St. Mark, to prevent the alarm being sounded. Many of the conspirators were put to the torture, and from their confessions it appeared that the doge was himself at the head of the association.

The tranquillity of the city was ensured, the criminals were seized, and the doge himself was guarded in his palace; but the Council of Ten did not consider itself as fully authorised by the constitution to sit in judgment on the chief of the republic. Twenty gentlemen of the highest rank were summoned to partake its deliberations on this important occasion. This was the origin of the powerful and permanent body called the Giunta or Zonta. The He was condoge was brought before the Council of Ten and the Giunta. fronted with the principal criminals, who were afterwards sent to execution. He confessed the part he had taken in the conspiracy, and on the second day of the proceedings was condemned to death. He was beheaded the 17th of April, 1355, upon the grand staircase of the ducal palace, in the same place where the doges, on assuming their functions, took the oath of fidelity to the republic. During the execution of his sentence, the doors were kept shut, but immediately after, a member of the Council of Ten appeared in the balcony, holding in his hand a bloody sword, and exclaiming, "Justice has been performed upon a great criminal." At the same moment, the gates of the palace were thrown open, and the multitude, rushing impetuously forward, beheld Falieri weltering in his blood.

SINGULAR PHENOMENON.

There have been, at different periods of time, very remarkable instances of the convulsions of nature, but there are few recorded equal to the following. In the month of April, 1793, the waters of the River de la Plata were forced, by a most violent current of wind, to the distance of ten leagues, so that the neighbouring plains were entirely inundated, and the bed of the river left quite dry. A number of ships, which had been sunk in the river for upwards of thirty years, were uncovered, and amongst others, an English vessel, which was cast away in the year 1762. Several persons repaired to the bed of the river, on which they could walk almost without wetting their feet, and returned laden with silver and other riches, which had long been buried under water. This phenomenon, which may be long ranked among the grand revolutions of nature, continued three days, at the end of which the wind ceased, and the water returned with great violence to its natural bed.

VOLUNTARY CONFESSION OF A MURDERER.

The following is the voluntary confession of the miscreant Lomas, taken before Mr. Thomas, one of the coroners of Cheshire, 14th of April, 1812, two days after the atrocious murder of his master, George Murrey, farmer of Hanklelow:

"That his mistress, Edith Murrey, set him on to murder his master and he was to have all he had. She told him to go to William Shaw's, who kept a public-house, in Hanklelow, on Saturday afternoon, the

11th of April, to get some drink, and she would get things ready to kill him. His master was gone to Audlem, and she told him (John Lomas) that he must not go to bed. He came home about twelve o'clock, and, as soon as his master was gone to bed and asleep, his mistress came up to his bed. He was asleep; she awoke him, and told him his master was fast asleep, and he must come and kill him. He refused; she went down stairs, and afterwards came up again, and went down again, and he (John Lomas) followed her. She had got the axe ready, and gave it him into his hand. He said it would be found out, and they should be sure to be hanged. She said she would see him safe, and swear he was fast asleep in bed, and would send the servant girl to call him up. He (John Lomas) said his master would awake before he reached the bed; and she would go in first, and put her hand up, if he were fast asleep, for him to come in and kill him. She put her hand up two or three times, and then said he must come in. He (Lomas) then went in, and his mistress held the candle, while he struck his master three times with the axe on the head. He struck him the first time over his temple. After he had struck him three times, he heard the servant wench, who slept in the next room, get upon the floor; and he said the servant was coming, on which his mistress wetted her finger and thumb, and put out the candle. He then ran towards the door, his master all the time shouting, "Oh Lord!" His mistress turned him back again, and said he must go back and finish him. Then he went again, and struck at him in the dark, three or four times, with the axe; but thought that he hit him only once with the head of it, and he then ran out of the parlour. His mistress met him in the house-place, and, opening a sheath, took out a razor, which she put into his hand, saying, that he must go and kill him out-he must cut his throat. He refused, but she gave him a bit of a push, and said he must go. She then went first, and he followed her with the razor in his hand. She flung the out-door of the house open, and then went into the parlour, where the servant slept, and shut the door after her, and he went into the parlour. His master was coming off the bed backwards, and he touched him, on which his master rose up, and caught him by the breast, and by the hand in which he held the razor. He sprang out of his arms, and then laid hold of him by the head, as he was on his knees, and cut his throat twice. He loosed him and ran, and his master fell on the floor, and he went up stairs, and got into bed. And soon after the servant girl came to call him up, and shook him several times; upon which he desired her to go down stairs, and leave the candle. He had the bloody shirt on, and did not put his hand out of bed, for fear of her seeing it. He then got up, and put his coat on over his bloody shirt; he dried his bloody hands upon his waistcoat; he also put his smock-frock on, and went down stairs. When he came down, the servant said somebody had murdered her master, and he was desired to go and see if he was quite dead. He went to the parlour door, and just peeped in, and said he thought he was."

This wretch was convicted at the ensuing Assizes, and executed on the 24th of August. His vile mistress pleaded pregnancy, and was respited for

a month.

PERSONAL SAFETY IN ITALY.

An English traveller in Italy thus writes to one of his friends: "I am in one of the most populous cities of Italy. A young lady, whom I accompanied home from a party, says to me, Go back the same way; do not cross over

[ocr errors]
« ПредишнаНапред »