This list includes only those cases commented upon editorially or in our Notes of Impor- tant Decisions, or in full annotated. The abbreviation Ed., indicates editorially-R. D., cases commented upon in our Notes of Important Decisions, and ann. case, annotated case. Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana B. & T. Co. (U. S. S. C.) The Old Law, the Fall V. Eastin (U. S. S. C.) Judgment-Faith and Credit for Decree Affecting Land in Another State, R. D. 154. Farmers' Bank of Deepwater v. Ogden (Mis- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Pennsylvania (U. S. Fleitmann v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co. (U. Frashella v. Taylor (New York) Negligence in Freeman v. United States (U. S. C. C. A.) Im- Gardner V. First National Bank of DeQueen Gardner v. Western Union Telegraph Co. (U. Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Gearing V. Berkson, et al., (Massachusetts) Gordon V. McLearn (Arkansas) Damages- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cream of Wheat Co. (U. S. C. C A.) Monopoly-Viol- ation of Notice as to Resale of Manufac- Grocer & Merchants Bureau of Nashville, Plain- tiff in Error v. Dr. W. E. Gray, Defendant in Error (Tennessee) Attorney and Client- What is Law Business, ann. case, 13. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. The Wolf Bros. & Co. (U. S. S. C.) The Rule of Recovery in Trade-Mark and in Unfair Competition, Henry v. Yost, et al., (Washington S. C.) Fraudulent Conveyances-Claim for Tort, Hill v. State (Alabama S. C.) Self-Defense- Houghton v. Houghton (South Dakota S. C.) Rights of Children in Divorce Proceedings, Illinois C. R. Co. v. Messina (U. S. S. C.) Car- riers-Riding Free With Employe's Consent, Implement Co. v. Morden (U. S. C. C. A.) Home- Innes v. Tobin (U. S. S. C.) Extradition-Requi- In re Heaton's Estate (Vermont S. C.) Stock Dividends as Going to Remainderman or In re Oldfield's Estate (Iowa S. C.) Breach of In the Matter of Pace & Stimpson (New York Jones National Bank v. Yates (U. S. S. C.) Ma- Kansas City W. Ry. Co. v. McAdow (U. S. S. C.) Pleading and Practice-Amending so as to Bring Action Under Federal Employers' Ketelson v. Stilz (Indiana S. C.) Common Law Maass v. Wardman (District of Columbia S. C.) Appeal and Error--Suggestion by a Court as to Preparation of Statement of Evidence and Its Settlement, R. D. 116. Maddocks V. Keene (Maine) Seal-Necessity of Melkusch V. Victor American Fuel Co. (New Michigan State Bank of Eaton Rapids v. Kern, Moyse Real Estate Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Nelson v. Illinois Cent, R. Co. (Iowa S. C.) Commerce-Federal Employers' Liability Northern Pacific R. Co. v. Meese (U. S. S. C.) Workmen's Compensation Act--State Con- struction Enforced, R. D. 225. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Wall (U. S. S. C.) Commerce Notice of Loss to Initial or Con- People v. Hudson Valley Const. Co. (New York C. A.) Intent-Evidence of Other Offenses Than That Being Tried, R. D. 224. Perkins v. United States (U. S. C. C. A.) Evi- Phair V. Dumond (Nebraska S. C.) Action- Phillips v. Browne (Illinois S. C.) Constitutional Phillips v. Western Union Tel. Co. (Missouri) Poupore, et al., v. Stone Ordean Wells Co., et Provident S. L. Assur. Co. v. Kentucky (U. S. S. C.) Foreign Corporations-- Carrying on Business Without License, R. D. 3. Putnam v. Browne, et al. (Wisconsin S. C.) Li- Railroad v. Public Service Commission (Missouri S. C.) Public Service Commission-Review by Court of Findings of Fact, R. D. 152. Rast, Collector, v. Van Deman & Lewis Co., et al. (U. S. S. C) Validity of License Tax on the 'se of Trading Stamps, Ed. 295. Rose v. Rose (Minnesota S., C.) Divorce-Acts Committed During Separation as Grounds St. Louis I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. House Oil & Mfg. State v. Carta (Connecticut) Evidence-With- State v. Davis (West Virginia S. C.) Intoxicating State v. McLaughlin (Louisiana S. C.) Criminal Law Statement by Victim of Homicide as State v. McCullagh (Kansas) Constitutional Straus v. Notaseme (U. S. S. C.) Trade-Marks- Profits in Unfair Competition, R. D. 2.9. Stone v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York (Tennessee S. C.) Insurance-Accident, ann. Stout v. United States (U. S. C. C. A.) Criminal Law-Presumption Against Accused for Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Rigsby (U. S. S. C.) Intrastate Employes Under Protection of Federal Safety Appliance Acts, Ed. 385. Turner, et al., v. Vann, et al. (North Carolina) Vendor and Purchaser-Sale in Gross, ann. United States v. Barrow (U. S. S. C.) False Per- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States 1. S. C. C. A.) Exercise of Right of Eminent Walker v. Walker (Rhode Island S. C.) Divorce -Direction of Decree From Bed and Board, Watson v. Mississippi River Power Co. (Iowa Wells v. Navigation Co. (New York) Unneces- Western Union Tel. Co. v. Sharp (Arkansaз S. C.) Commerce-Telegram From One Point to Another in Same State With Wire Cross- Wheat v. Hill (U. S. C. C. A.) Wills-Computa- tion of Degrees of Kinship by Discredited Winfield v. Erie R. Co. (New Jersey) Workmen's Compensation Act-- Recovery of Employe in Interstate Commerce, no Negligence Being Winfield v. New York, C. & H. R. Co. (New Yor Recovery Under Workmen's Compensation Act for Injury Suffered in Interstate Com- Negligence, Ed. 43. Wolf v. Harris (Missouri S. C.) Injunction--Li- Yaozo & M. V. R. Co. v. Walls (Mississippi S. C.) Carrier of Passengers-Passenger on Youngerman v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. Commencement of Relation, ann. 1913 Edition Robbins on American Advocacy SECOND EDITION BY ALEXANDER H. ROBBINS Professor of Advocacy and Legal Ethics in St. Louis The first edition of this work was received with great favor by lawyers all over the country and adopted in twelve law schools as the best text-book on the subject of advocacy and legal ethics. Advocacy is the study of the "personal equation" in the application of law to actual conditions of life. To be able to win the mind and the confidence of court, jury and witnesses and the respect and esteem of one's profession is the most important element in a successful career at the bar. There is included in this volume the full, official publication of the American Bar Association's Canons of Professional Ethics, upon which candidates for admission to the bar must stand examination in most of the states of the Union. |