Графични страници
PDF файл
ePub

252. Cæs. Welcome, Publius.--

What, Brutus, are you stirred so early too?
Good morrow, Casca.-Caius Ligarius,
Cæsar was ne'er so much your enemy,
As that same ague which hath made you lean. -

What is't o'clock ?
253. Bru. Cæsar, 'tis strucken eight.
254. Cæs. I thank you for your pains and courtesy.

Enter ANTONY
See! Antony, that revels long o'nights,
Is, notwithstanding, up:
Good morrow, Antony.

Ant. So to most noble Cæsar.
256. Cæs. Bid them prepare within :-

I am to blame to be thus waited for.-
Now, Cinna :-Now, Metellus :- What, Trebonius!
I have an hour's talk in store for you.
Remember that you call on me to-day :
Be near me, that I may remember you.

Treb. Cæsar, I will:--and so near will I be,
That
your

best friends shall wish I had been farther. [.A side. Cæs. Good friends, go in, and taste some wine with me; And we, like friends, will straightway go together. 259. Bru. That every like is not the same, O Cæsar,

The heart of Brutus yearns to think upon ! [ Aside. Exeunt.

[ocr errors]

Scene II. The same. A Room in Cæsar's Palace. This is not in the old editions; but the stage direction that follows is, only with Julius Cæsar (for Cæsar).

227. Nor heaven nor earth, etc.—This use of nor nor for the usual neither ... nor of prose (as well as of

or for either ... or) is still common in our poetry. On the other hand, either was sometimes used formerly in cases where we now always have or; as in Luke vi. 42:-“Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? "--The strict grammatical principle would of

course require has been at peace;” but where, as here, the two singular substantives are looked at together by the mind, it is more natural to regard them as making a plurality, and to use the plural verb, notwithstanding the disjunctive conjunction (as it is sometimes oddly designated).

229. Do present sacrifice. In this and a good many other cases we are now obliged to employ a verb of a more specific character instead of the general do. This is a different kind of archaism from what we have in the “do danger" of 147, where it is not the do, but the danger, that has a meaning which it has now lost, and for which the modern language uses another word.

229. Their opinions of success.—That is, merely, of the issue, or of what is prognosticated by the sacrifice as likely to happen. Johnson remarks (note on Othello, iii. 3) that successo is also so used in Italian. So likewise is succès in French. In addition to earlier examples of such a sense of the English word, Boswell adduces from Sidney's Arcadia :—“He never answered me, but, pale and quaking, went straight away; and straight my heart misgave me some evil success ; ” and from Dr Barrow, in the latter part of the seventeenth century :-"Yea, to a person so disposed, that success which seemeth most adverse justly may be reputed the best and most happy.” Shakespeare's ordinary employment of the word, however, is accordant with our present usage. But see 735, 736. Sometimes it is used in the sense of our modern succession; as in A Winter's Tale, i. 2 : “Our parents' noble names, In whose success we are gentle.” In the same manner the verb to succeed, though meaning etymologically no more than to follow, has come to be commonly understood, when used without qualification, only in a good sense. We still say that George II. succeeded George I., and could even, perhaps, say that a person or thing had succeeded very ill: but when we say simply, that any thing has succeeded, we mean that it has had a prosperous issue.

Shakespeare's use of the word success may be further illustrated by the following examples :-

• Is
your

blood
So madly hot, that no discourse of reason,
Nor fear of bad success in a bad cause,
Can qualify the same ?”Troil. and Cress., ii. 2;
“Commend me to my brother : soon at night
I'll send him certain word of my success.

Meas. for Meas., 1. 5;
“Let this be so, and doubt not but success
Will fashion the event in better shape
Than I can lay it down in likelihood.

Much Ado About Noth., iv. 1;
“ And so success of mischief shall be born,
And heir from heir shall hold this quarrel up.”

Second Part of Henry IV., iv. 2;
" Should you do so, my lord,
My speech should fall into such vile success

Which my thoughts aimed not.Othello, iii. 3. 233. I never stood on ceremonies.— Vid. 194.

233. Recounts most horrid sights.- Who recounts. As in 34 and 214.

233. Which drizzled blood.To drizzle is to shed (or to fall) in small drops. The Dictionaries bring it from the German rieseln (of the same signification); but the English word probably derives a main part of its peculiar effect from the same initial dr which we have in drip, drop, drivel, etc.

233. The noise of battle hurtled in the air.—The three last Folios substitute hurried for hurtled. Hurtle is

probably the same word with hurl (of which, again, whirl may be another variation). Chaucer uses it as an active verb in the sense of to push forcibly and with violence; as in C. T. 2618 :

" And he him hurtleth with his hors adoun ;' and again in C. T. 4717 :

"O firste-moving cruel firmament!

With thy diurnal swegh that croudest ay,
And hurtlest all from est til occident,
That naturally wold hold another way.”

Its very sound makes it an expressive word for any kind of rude and crushing, or “insupportably advancing," movement. Hustle and justle (or jostle) may be considered, if not as other forms, or somewhat softened modifications, of the same vocal utterance of thought, as at least fashioned upon the same principle.

233. Horses did neigh, and dying men did groan. This is the reading of the Second and subsequent Folios. The First has “Horses do neigh, and dying men did grone.” We may confidently affirm that no degree of mental agitation ever expressed itself in any human being in such a jumble and confusion of tenses as this --not even insanity or drunkenness. The “Fierce fiery warriors fight upon the clouds,” which we have a few lines before, is not a case in point. It is perfectly natural in animated narrative or description to rise occasionally from the past tense to the present; but who ever heard of two facts or circumstances equally past, strung together, as here, with an and, and enunciated in the same breath, being presented the one as now going on, the other as only having taken place ? Mr Collier's MS. annotator, it is to be presumed, approves or accepts the“ did neigh” of the Second Folio.

233. And ghosts did shriek and squeal about the streets. --It is rare to find Shakespeare coming so near upon

the same words in two places as he does here and in dealing with the same subject in Hamlet, 1. 1:

"In the most high and palmy state of Rome,

A little ere the mightiest Julius fell,
The graves stood tenantless, and the sheeted dead
Did squeak and gibber in the Roman streets.”

[ocr errors]

This passage, however, is found only in the Quarto editions of Hamlet, and is omitted in all the Folios.

233. Beyond all use.—We might still say “beyond all use and wont."

234. Whose end is purposed, etc.-The end, or completion, of which is designed by the gods.

236. What say the augurers ? —Vid. 194.--The preceding stage direction is in the original edition, “ Enter a Servant."

238. In shame of cowardice.-For the shame of cowardice, to put cowardice to shame.

238. Cæsar should be a beast. - We should now say Cæsar would be a beast. It is the same use of shall where we now use will that has been noticed at 181. So in Merchant of Venice, 1. 2, Nerissa, conversing with her mistress Portia about her German suitor, the nephew of the Duke of Saxony, says, “If he should offer to choose, and choose the right casket, you should refuse to perform your father's will if you should refuse to accept him. Yet the fashion of saying It should appear, or It should seem (instead of It would), which has come up with the revived study of our old literature, is equally at variance with the principle by which our modern employment of shall and will is regulated.

238. We are two lions.—The old reading, in all the Folios, is We heare (or hear in the Third and Fourth). Nobody, as far as I am aware, has defended it, or affected to be able to make any sense of it. Theobald proposed We

'e were, which has been generally adopted. But We are, as recommended by Upton, is at once nearer to the original and much more spirited. It is a singularly happy restoration, and one in regard to which, I conceive, there can scarcely be the shadow of a doubt. It is, however, confirmed, if it needed any confirmation, by its being found among the corrections of Mr Collier's MS. annotator.

« ПредишнаНапред »